On 14 May 2013 08:36, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> ack. That's what I meant.
>
> Uli
>
I agree the conclusion is more journalism than actual value.
It could be fun, however to get our total code base tested like that. Seen
in that perspective ASF is one big "family" of projects, so it would be
fair to
Much more interesting is the statistical analysis in the comments (which is
missing from the main
article) that concludes: these numbers are bullshit.
Uli
On 13.05.2013 21:24, janI wrote:
> http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/05/coverity-report/
>
I would weaken that statement a little bit.
The numbers are fine. The *conclusions* are bullshit.
As an example, there were 13 systems total over a million lines of code.
Yet the authors drew grand conclusions. The number 13 isn't bullshit. It
just isn't large enough to draw really strong con
ack. That's what I meant.
Uli
On 14.05.2013 08:34, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I would weaken that statement a little bit.
>
> The numbers are fine. The *conclusions* are bullshit.
>
> As an example, there were 13 systems total over a million lines of code. Yet
> the authors drew grand
> conclusion
twitter is -1. Off on the spread the word page!thanks guys.John Youn
Mastering Engineer / MPGInsider
Interscope Records
COS
The provisions of Section 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 apply to this email notice and make it enforceable and binding on the recipie
Hi,
our buildbot building trunk nightly for windows has problems in modul
apr since a couple of days.
Unfortunately, the log does provide nothing for a reason not known to me.
Thus, I will try to investigate the problem.
Hopefully, I can change the buildbot script to get the build output
dire
Hi, all:
Now I am working on a bugzilla issue 121897, which seems a writer undo/redo
corresponding issue. Inside there are some questions I met, which may need
help from the experts.
Here is background:
There are some refine work in SW undo/redo mechanism for integrating into
the SfxUndoManager
On 4/16/2013 11:04 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
On 4/16/2013 7:19 AM, RGB ES wrote:
2013/4/16 Donald Whytock
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Donald Whytock
wrote:
When non-subscribers email the list, do they at least get an
autoresponse
that says, "You're not a subscriber to this email list, so
On 14 May 2013 11:31, Peter Junge wrote:
> On 4/16/2013 11:04 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
>
>> On 4/16/2013 7:19 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/4/16 Donald Whytock
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Donald Whytock
wrote:
When non-subscribers email the list, do they at least get
Rob,
I will try to submit my refined logo by Wednesday.
Regards,
Kevin
On May 11, 2013, at 2:02 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:55 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 10 May 2013 17:54, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to all in the community who took time to offer feedback on our
>>> rec
Original Message
From: Peter Junge
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 17:31:24 +0800
> On 4/16/2013 11:04 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
>> On 4/16/2013 7:19 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>>> 2013/4/16 Donald Whytock
>>>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Donald Whytock
Original Message
From: janI
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:38:59 +0200
> On 14 May 2013 11:31, Peter Junge wrote:
>
>> On 4/16/2013 11:04 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/16/2013 7:19 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>>>
2013/4/16 Donald Whytock
O
On 14/05/2013 Peter Junge wrote:
"You're not a subscriber to this email list, so you might not
see
responses to your email. Read all the messages sent to the list here
or subscribe by clicking here".
Did someone ever file an issue or checked out if the proposed solution
works for infra?
I did
On 14 May 2013 13:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 14/05/2013 Peter Junge wrote:
>
>> "You're not a subscriber to this email list, so you might not
see
responses to your email. Read all the messages sent to the list here
or subscribe by clicking here".
>>> Did someone ever fil
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
>
>> (Added dev in this mail thread ..)
>>
>> Simon and all,
>>
>> Here is the update of the preparation for full regression:
>>
>> - All test cases are populated to test plan "AOO 4.0 Full Regr
Question about Pootle
Apache OpenOffice 4.x » cui / source / dialogs.po
String 2:
Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation.
- maybe replace by -
Copyright © 2013 Apache Software Foundation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:32 AM, FR web forum wrote:
> Question about Pootle
> Apache OpenOffice 4.x » cui / source / dialogs.po
> String 2:
> Copyright © 2012 Apache Software Foundation.
> - maybe replace by -
> Copyright © 2013 Apache Software Foundation.
>
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bu
Hi Oliver,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:16:31AM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our buildbot building trunk nightly for windows has problems in
> modul apr since a couple of days.
> Unfortunately, the log does provide nothing for a reason not known to me.
>
> Thus, I will try to inv
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> >
> >> (Added dev in this mail thread ..)
> >>
> >> Simon and all,
> >>
> >> Here is the update of the preparation for full regression:
>
Working on blog post now, target tomorrow AM.
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi
the new version of pootle went online a moment ago.
Thx to jsc the last translations are in the server. Jsc is still
controlling our po files and how we shall use the server.
There might be minor issues the next couple of days, so please mail the
list if you find things that are not as the sh
Thanks for info, Jani
and yes, the performance may be yet not optimal but
is functional
Antón
2013/5/14 janI :
> Hi
>
> the new version of pootle went online a moment ago.
>
> Thx to jsc the last translations are in the server. Jsc is still
> controlling our po files and how we shall use the ser
On 5/13/2013 8:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Stuart,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:16:55AM +, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Sorry for the cross post, but this rubs on both the QA and Dev sides
of the project.
So, I understand that we are mid-way through, a full regression
testing of the 4.0
On 26/01/2013 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 20/01/2013 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/FOSDEM+2013+Organization
Here is a proposal that I'm submitting for lazy consensus. ...
At least, we will need a simple banner (an X-banner or a roll-up banner)
and a
janI wrote:
the new version of pootle went online a moment ago.
Thx to jsc the last translations are in the server. Jsc is still
controlling our po files and how we shall use the server.
Thanks! This is a major development and it will allow new volunteers to
work directly online (with proper a
25 matches
Mail list logo
