ack. That's what I meant. Uli
On 14.05.2013 08:34, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would weaken that statement a little bit. > > The numbers are fine. The *conclusions* are bullshit. > > As an example, there were 13 systems total over a million lines of code. Yet > the authors drew grand > conclusions. The number 13 isn't bullshit. It just isn't large enough to > draw really strong > conclusions. > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@apache.org > <mailto:u...@apache.org>> wrote: > > Much more interesting is the statistical analysis in the comments (which > is missing from the main > article) that concludes: these numbers are bullshit. > > Uli > > On 13.05.2013 21:24, janI wrote: > > http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/05/coverity-report/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
