Hello:
I tried twice to download Symphony, and I am running into
complications. Both times, I have received the following error:
---
IBM Lotus Symphony
---
The launcher failed with an error. Refer to
C:\Users\Reina\IBM\Lotus\Symphony\\logs\rcplaunc
Le 14/03/2013 12:41, Rob Weir a écrit :
I'm not sure votes from 2002 are the most accurate way of determining
what users want. For example, I think we'd agree that the
most-critical issue in 3.4.1 is the profile-related crash. But the
Bugzilla issue for this has received *zero* votes:
http://p
Hagar Delest wrote:
You must be talking about this one:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120463
Of course this bug has zero vote. It's a huge regression
Actually, the one to follow (fixed) is
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121625
and my issue you specify above was ju
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 14/03/2013 15:10, Rob Weir a écrit :
>
>> But if only a small minority of users know about voting, and we have a
>> large collection of ancient votes, then the votes are less meaningful
>> and relevant. That's my main concern. I don't bel
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Hagar Delest wrote:
>>
>> You must be talking about this one:
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120463
>> Of course this bug has zero vote. It's a huge regression
>
>
> Actually, the one to follow (fixed) is
> https://issues.
In light of our recent start on Strategic Planning, is it worthwhile to
investigate some sort of survey mechanism? I know we've used Google
Moderator, and I see there were mixed opinions on that. We really need to
get a better feel of WHAT our end users are doing with AOO I think, before
we can ge
2013/3/17 Kay Schenk
> In light of our recent start on Strategic Planning, is it worthwhile to
> investigate some sort of survey mechanism? I know we've used Google
> Moderator, and I see there were mixed opinions on that. We really need to
> get a better feel of WHAT our end users are doing wit
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2013/3/17 Kay Schenk
>
>> In light of our recent start on Strategic Planning, is it worthwhile to
>> investigate some sort of survey mechanism? I know we've used Google
>> Moderator, and I see there were mixed opinions on that. We really need to
>
Reina,
I am going to attempt a fresh install of Symphony to see if I can
duplicate the problem. I will be installing on Windows Vista (x86)
in a Virtual Machine. It has no Java installed. I will remove
OpenOffice 3.4.0 and also perform a full security scan
before I install Symphony.
I think y
On 12/03/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
But in general, yes I think it can be a candidate for GSOC when somebody
will mentor it.
OK. I've now entered it in Bugzilla, not to lose track of it:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121909
Regards,
Andrea.
--
A. I was able to install Symphony 3.0.1 and the Fix Pack 2. I also
have obtained the rcplauncher.log, which is rather interesting.
B. When you are able to get Symphony operating, there is a feature
that will be interesting to understand the accessibility of. There is
a sidebar on the right of t
On 15/03/2013 FR web forum wrote:
In first time, we could transfer our tutorials from french www:
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Documentation
But I do not want to impose. If this is too complicated, you drop.
Your links show that we do have a lot of materials available. So a
dedicated website c
Any attempt to reset the votes would mean that once more, high scores are just
ignored.
Of course, nobody would browse the whole list of existing bugs, even to recast
their own votes. So reseting the votes would only lead to forget about old bugs
or old RFE.
Have office suites really evolved so
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 09:56:31PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/03/2013 FR web forum wrote:
> >In first time, we could transfer our tutorials from french www:
> >http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Documentation
> >But I do not want to impose. If this is too complicated, you drop.
>
> Your links
Hi,
I tried to build, but it breaks in extensions with
trunk\main\extensions\source\ole\unoconversionutilities.hxx(2038) :
error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'nelementSize'
The line before it is
TYPELIB_DANGER_GET( &pSeqElemDesc, pSeqElemDescRef)
TYPELIB_DANGER_GET come
On 2013-03-17 8:32 AM Rob Weir wrote:
I'm sorry that the troglodytes don't like that.
That is a very insulting comment. Why do you have to make derogatory comments to people who
disagree with your opinion? Where did you get you Masters in alienating people?
--
___
... I also noticed that when you zoom a text document the lines for
redlining as well as for smarttags, etc. are not zoomed in the same way
and makes it less visible. But this seems to be a general issue.
Juergen
Hi, Jürgen,
This is one of my pet peeves. The major problem seems to be the line
Hagar Delest wrote:
if the votes are reset, I'll take it as a huge setback for the users
decisions
Resetting votes does not make sense. There is a limit on how many bugs a
user can vote for and votes can be reallocated, so it isn't necessarily
true that an old bug has more votes just because
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Any attempt to reset the votes would mean that once more, high scores are
> just ignored.
> Of course, nobody would browse the whole list of existing bugs, even to
> recast their own votes. So reseting the votes would only lead to forget
> abo
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Hagar Delest wrote:
>>
>> if the votes are reset, I'll take it as a huge setback for the users
>> decisions
>
>
> Resetting votes does not make sense. There is a limit on how many bugs a
> user can vote for and votes can be reallocated, so
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Developers work on what they want to work on. This is not a problem.
> Most developers on the project today have their own list of items they
> want to work on. That is fine. Maybe we get developers who don't
> have a preference and would be happy
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> Developers work on what they want to work on. This is not a problem.
>> Most developers on the project today have their own list of items they
>> want to work on. That is fine. Maybe we get d
Hi Regina,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:25:19PM +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build, but it breaks in extensions with
> trunk\main\extensions\source\ole\unoconversionutilities.hxx(2038) :
> error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier
> 'nelementSize'
>
> The line
KG01 - see comments inline.
On Mar 18, 2013, at 1:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM, RGB ES wrote:
>> 2013/3/17 Kay Schenk
>>
>>> In light of our recent start on Strategic Planning, is it worthwhile to
>>> investigate some sort of survey mechanism?
KG01 - Graham and
24 matches
Mail list logo
