On 17.05.2013 11:08, Pavel Janík wrote:
Thus, all is fine, no unused/new/unexpected entry. From the C++ perspective
it's questionable when this leads to extra-code in switch/case statements for
an entry which seems to be there for UNO technical reasons to be warning-free.
Those entries have no
> Thus, all is fine, no unused/new/unexpected entry. From the C++ perspective
> it's questionable when this leads to extra-code in switch/case statements for
> an entry which seems to be there for UNO technical reasons to be
> warning-free. Those entries have no informational content as it seems
Hi Pavel,
On 17.05.2013 10:24, Armin Le Grand wrote:
Hi Pavel,
On 17.05.2013 07:37, Pavel Janík wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Pavel Janík wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
I am confused; where does
com::sun::star::drawing::LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE c
Hi Pavel,
On 17.05.2013 07:37, Pavel Janík wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Pavel Janík wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
I am confused; where does com::sun::star::drawing::LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE
come from? When you look at he UNO API file
(trunk\main\o
On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Pavel Janík wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
>
>> I am confused; where does com::sun::star::drawing::LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE
>> come from? When you look at he UNO API file
>> (trunk\main\offapi\com\sun\star\drawing\LineJoint.idl)
On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
> I am confused; where does com::sun::star::drawing::LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE
> come from? When you look at he UNO API file
> (trunk\main\offapi\com\sun\star\drawing\LineJoint.idl) there is no such
> definition. Since the headers are genera
Hi Pavel,
I am confused; where does
com::sun::star::drawing::LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE come from? When you
look at he UNO API file
(trunk\main\offapi\com\sun\star\drawing\LineJoint.idl) there is no such
definition. Since the headers are generated from the UNO API files I
would wonder if
Who is the author of this code? Is it right to not handle the value in these
switches?
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Pavel Janík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please have a look at this change:
>
> http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/WaE-cui+svx-LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE.diff
>
> LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE is not handl
Hi,
please have a look at this change:
http://tmp.janik.cz/AO/WaE-cui+svx-LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE.diff
LineJoint_MAKE_FIXED_SIZE is not handled in two switch commands. It is OK?
Please add proper handling or default case or whatever suits you.
--
Pavel Janík
-
