> Thus, all is fine, no unused/new/unexpected entry. From the C++ perspective > it's questionable when this leads to extra-code in switch/case statements for > an entry which seems to be there for UNO technical reasons to be > warning-free. Those entries have no informational content as it seems.
Right. Should I change them to default: break; instead? -- Pavel Janík --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
