On 17.05.2013 11:08, Pavel Janík wrote:
Thus, all is fine, no unused/new/unexpected entry. From the C++ perspective
it's questionable when this leads to extra-code in switch/case statements for
an entry which seems to be there for UNO technical reasons to be warning-free.
Those entries have no informational content as it seems.
Right. Should I change them to default: break; instead?
Maybe better, makes things clearar from my POV -> +1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
