Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 10/03/22 Pedro Lino wrote: Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to do this update ;) Thank you for taking over! I'll try to get the instructions posted to some "official" shared space by this weekend. Regards, Andrea. ---

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Marcus, Am 10.03.22 um 21:12 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10.03.22 um 18:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 10.03.22 um 17:52 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> >>> Yes, it was updated on March 1st >>> >>> Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained >>> "staff" to do this update ;) >>> >>> I

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Am 10.03.22 um 18:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 10.03.22 um 17:52 schrieb Pedro Lino: Yes, it was updated on March 1st Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to do this update ;) I can confirm that it also works perfectly under Linux using the 4.1.12 Nigh

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Pedro, Am 10.03.22 um 17:52 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > Yes, it was updated on March 1st > > Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to > do this update ;) > > I can confirm that it also works perfectly under Linux using the 4.1.12 > Nightly builds

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Matthias Yes, it was updated on March 1st Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to do this update ;) I can confirm that it also works perfectly under Linux using the 4.1.12 Nightly builds Maybe this is a good enough motive to release 4.1.12 to all? Reg

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Pedro, all, Am 19.02.22 um 17:56 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Andrea, all > >> On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> I'm assuming lazy consensus on giving you permissions on the Extensions >> site (not the site itself, actually, but the shell access). You should >> post here your Sour

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 20.02.22 00:41, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 19/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote: no one opposes that I have permissions on the Extensions shell access? Done! You have it now. Who can handle this so you can teach me further steps? I've written extensive documentation with the aim of adding it to

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 19/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote: no one opposes that I have permissions on the Extensions shell access? Done! You have it now. Who can handle this so you can teach me further steps? I've written extensive documentation with the aim of adding it to https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastruc

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea, all > On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I'm assuming lazy consensus on giving you permissions on the Extensions > site (not the site itself, actually, but the shell access). You should > post here your SourceForge username for you to be added. > > Once we are ready wi

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea > On 02/13/2022 10:11 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since > the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's > still weekend! Thank you for taking some time to do this and for testing first! > So,

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 11/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote: Do you have time for this issue during this weekend? Hello Pedro, I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's still weekend! So, the first steps on your side, sinc

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 > > is available. If the user has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will > > always report that "No new updates are available." > > This is not odd actually, it is quite easily explained. > > The update feed, much lik

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea Thank you for the fast reply! > On 02/03/2022 11:01 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > The update feed, much like the one we use for OpenOffice itself, has > information on the latest available version. If you don't update it (I > mean, "updating the update feed") for a while it will still

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Pedro Lino wrote: I found some odd results. If the user has an older than 2017 version of the dictionary, the Extension Update dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 is available. If the user has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will always report that "No new updates are avai

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Returning to this subject: I found some odd results. If the user has an older than 2017 version of the dictionary, the Extension Update dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 is available. If the user has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will always report that "No new update

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Matthias > On 02/03/2022 11:04 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Is it possible to re-activate the update feed for SourceForge? I'm available to do this if someone helps me. Andrea? Regards, Pedro > Am 15.03.21 um 21:12 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Hi again Andrea > > > > Marco has released two versi

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Pedro, all, Bumping this one up: Is it possible to re-activate the update feed for SourceForge? Regards,    Matthias Am 15.03.21 um 21:12 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi again Andrea > > Marco has released two versions since the one included in AOO 4.1.9 > > Can you update this or teach us how to

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi again Andrea Marco has released two versions since the one included in AOO 4.1.9 Can you update this or teach us how to do it? Thanks! Regards, Pedro > On 03/10/2021 4:42 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > > Hi Andrea, > > When would be the best time for an update? > > Regards, > >    Ma

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea, When would be the best time for an update? Regards,    Matthias Am 22.01.21 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote: >>> Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and >>> republish only after 4.1.9 is out ... >> It is fixed indeed (a

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea > On 01/21/2021 11:39 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > OK, thank you for checking. I've now reverted the fix and we'll go live > with a more complete version when people will have upgraded to 4.1.9. Agreed. Thank you! > But when we are not in proximity of a release, we can trigger the u

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote: Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and republish only after 4.1.9 is out ... It is fixed indeed (although I get 2 notifications for that extension, but one problem at a time!). Thanks! OK, thank you for checking. I've now reverted

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea > On 01/21/2021 8:04 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I believe it's fixed now (limited to the specific case of the English > dictionary; I had to find some workarounds so I enabled only that > extension for testing). > Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

n for testing). Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and republish only after 4.1.9 is out (or users will be confused by the double update; this is exactly the reason for the update to be manual by the way). [...] To check: in OpenOffice, check for Extensions Updates

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

p -A1 org.openoffice.en.hunspell.dictionaries After: $ curl -s https://extensions.openoffice.org/ExtensionUpdateService/check.Update | grep -A1 org.openoffice.en.hunspell.dictionaries To check: in OpenOffice, check for Extensions Updates (not OpenOffice updates) and see whether

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Andrea > On 01/20/2021 10:23 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I think we can fix it. Let me give it a try tomorrow. Excellent! Thanks! > What I can do tomorrow is: I can check whether our (site moderator) > access is enough to push the updated feed live; and I'll document it > internally in ca

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

On 20/01/2021 Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 20.01.21 um 00:47 schrieb Pedro Lino: On 01/19/2021 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: In this case it looks for the feed on the SourceForge server. My guess is, that these feeds are not generated anymore. I don't know if this was an automatic

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Pedro, Am 20.01.21 um 00:47 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, Marco, all > > >> On 01/19/2021 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >> AOO is looking for an "update feed", quite similar to the release >> updates. >> (Release updat

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Matthias, Marco, all > On 01/19/2021 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > > AOO is looking for an "update feed", quite similar to the release updates. > (Release update feeds are generated by hand after every release) > > In this case it looks for

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi, My understanding is: AOO is looking for an "update feed", quite similar to the release updates. (Release update feeds are generated by hand after every release) In this case it looks for the feed on the SourceForge server. My guess is, that these feeds are not generated anymor

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Czeslaw > On 01/19/2021 1:14 PM Czesław Wolański wrote: > 4.1.9 RC1, Windows 7 > English spelling extension: > I can confirm your observation - checking for update of any version > (2020.07.01 - 2020.12.01) > results in a message "No new updates are available."

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Marco This may be broken for a long time. Please remember that checking for updates (extensions or program) was broken for years. It is only since 4.1.8 that it is working again. But this is only a problem for people who need the English dictionary but do not use the Windows English

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

9 RC1 under Windows 7 and I just noticed that the English spelling extension I have installed is from 2020.07.01 but Checking for updates does not report any new version. This is particularly odd because this extension is updated monthly (including in January 2021). Installing an older version of an

Re: Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi Pedro, 4.1.9 RC1, Windows 7 English spelling extension: I can confirm your observation - checking for update of any version (2020.07.01 - 2020.12.01) results in a message "No new updates are available.". Regards, Czesław Am Di., 19. Jan. 2021 um 13:04 Uhr schrieb Pedro Lino : >

Check for English spelling extension updates broken?

Hi all I am testing version 4.1.9 RC1 under Windows 7 and I just noticed that the English spelling extension I have installed is from 2020.07.01 but Checking for updates does not report any new version. This is particularly odd because this extension is updated monthly (including in January

Re: Copyright updates

Hi Jim, Am 04.01.21 um 17:23 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Just a reminder that as we update files within the AOO > repo, we should also take the opportunity to update the > copyright dates on said files to 2021... There is no need > to wholesale update the copyright on *all* files in > bulk, just as w

Copyright updates

Just a reminder that as we update files within the AOO repo, we should also take the opportunity to update the copyright dates on said files to 2021... There is no need to wholesale update the copyright on *all* files in bulk, just as we modify them... Cheers, and Happy 2021!

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

FTR: For the changes I proposed, I'd do the work. I don't propose things unless I'm willing and able to roll up my sleeves and do 'em ;) > On Dec 9, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: >>> >>> Hello Ji

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: >> >> Hello Jim, >> >>> >>> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >>> >>> --with-epm >>> --with-dmake >>> --with-beanshell >> >> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate >> ve

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Hello Jim, all, On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:22:51AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel > > wrote: > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit > >> that some

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Hello Jim, I think I understand it nowe clear Kine regards Mechtilde Am 09.12.20 um 16:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > >> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: >> >> Hello Jim, >> >>> >>> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >>> >>> --with-epm >>> --with-dmake >>> --with-beanshell >>

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit >> that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. >> >> For example, >> >> --with-dmake-p

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Hi Jim, Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit > that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. > > For example, > > --with-dmake-path > --with-dmake-url > --with-epm > --with-epm-url > > Why does dmake

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Jim, > >> >> So I was thinking we just have these 3: >> >> --with-epm >> --with-dmake >> --with-beanshell > > I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate > version like in ext_sources. Can you provide an e

Re: Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Hello Jim, Am 09.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit > that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. > > For example, > > --with-dmake-path > --with-dmake-url > --with-epm > --with-epm-url > > Why doe

Updates to ./configure(.ac)

Now that I'm thinking about the configure script, I have to admit that some things really look like they could/should be fixed. For example, --with-dmake-path --with-dmake-url --with-epm --with-epm-url Why does dmake use dmake-path but EPM just use epm? Why 2 directives when they could

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. jim pushed a commit to branch trunk in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

F dual-hosted git repository. >> >> jim pushed a commit to branch trunk >> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >> new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bri

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

ual-hosted git repository. > > jim pushed a commit to branch trunk > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: > new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

fice.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push: >> new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and >> Linux. >> d73dd1d is described below >> >> commit d73dd1d32e12ca3b96b7bbfff854b7

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

ds/trunk by this push: > new d73dd1d Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and > Linux. > d73dd1d is described below > > commit d73dd1d32e12ca3b96b7bbfff854b742992ff915 > Author: Jim Jagielski > AuthorDate: Tue Dec 1 16:59:54 2020 -0500 > > Huge updates

Re: Apache Dependency Updates/Upgrades?

That all makes sense to me... I would guess that #4 and #8 would be the easiest and low hanging fruit. > On Nov 17, 2020, at 2:10 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> (5) Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 (this is the final 5.5 release) upgrade to version >> 7 or 8(?) >> \servletapi\jsr154\dist\lib\servlet-api.jar

Re: Apache Dependency Updates/Upgrades?

Hi Dave, Single comment inline: Am 17.11.20 um 17:00 schrieb Dave Fisher: > I did a little research on our versions of Apache dependencies in trunk. Some > are quite out of date and it might be worth considering updates or upgrades. > > For Discussion: > > (1) Apache Commons

Re: Apache Dependency Updates/Upgrades?

> (5) Apache Tomcat 5.5.36 (this is the final 5.5 release) upgrade to version 7 > or 8(?) > \servletapi\jsr154\dist\lib\servlet-api.jar > > /trunk/main/odk/examples/java/ConverterServlet/ > Can we up

Apache Dependency Updates/Upgrades?

I did a little research on our versions of Apache dependencies in trunk. Some are quite out of date and it might be worth considering updates or upgrades. For Discussion: (1) Apache Commons Codec update from 1.9 to 1.15? https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/changes-report.html#a1.15

Possible error in File https://www.openoffice.org/sc/excelfileformat.pdf (was: How to go about confirming a possible bug and contributing updates to a document )

Hello Jay, Am 21.10.20 um 16:49 schrieb Jay Wren (jawren): Hello, I hope this message finds you well. First, I want to thank you for https://www.openoffice.org/sc/excelfileformat.pdf I have found it invaluable. Thank you. You are welcome. It is good to know that people take interest in our

[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum closed pull request #108: Merge updates from trunk into maven-jars-2 branch

cbmarcum closed pull request #108: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/108 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum opened a new pull request #108: Merge updates from trunk into maven-jars-2 branch

cbmarcum opened a new pull request #108: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/108 Merge updates from trunk into maven-jars-2 branch. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum merged pull request #107: Update maven-jars branch with trunk updates

cbmarcum merged pull request #107: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/107 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

Re: check for updates broken?

And we have plans to fix the issue on the server once 4.1.8 is released for a week or two. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 8, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi John > > >>> On 10/08/2020 8:51 PM John D'Orazio >>> wrote: >> >> Is

Re: check for updates broken?

Hi John > On 10/08/2020 8:51 PM John D'Orazio > wrote: > Is the "Check for Updates" function broken by chance? Or is it just me? > This is on a Windows 10 PC... It is indeed broken (it has been for some years now) but fortunately it is already fixed in version

check for updates broken?

On one computer I use I hadn't yet downloaded version 4.1.7 of OpenOffice. I thought I would try using the "Check for Updates" button in the "Help" menu instead of going directly to the sourceforge download, but I am seeing an error message in this window : STATUS: Chec

Re: translate.apache.org updates

Hello Chris, thanks for your work Regards Am 23.03.20 um 22:55 schrieb Chris Lambertus: > > All, > > In cooperation with the OpenOffice project, Infra has deployed an updated > version of the Pootle translate system. The official translate.apache.org > site wil

translate.apache.org updates

All, In cooperation with the OpenOffice project, Infra has deployed an updated version of the Pootle translate system. The official translate.apache.org site will be transitioning to this new system approximately 1600 UTC 24 March. Please contact Infra if any iss

Re: Can't download updates

You can go to the web page http://www.openoffice.org/download/, choose the appropriate operating system and language and then click on Download Full Installation. You will be redirected to a page on SourceForge where the download will start automatically. You do not need to click anything on the So

Can't download updates

I receive a message that download failed for update for open office. How do I receive a current update for Open Office? Thank you.

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Matthias > > > > Version 4.1.6 was released one month ago. > > This problem has not been solved yet (so in theory many users were > > not notified of this update) > > Can this be fixed? > > > > > It has a smaller impact than I would have expected. We d

Re: Check for Updates broken?

t;>>> On December 5, 2018 at 10:01 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>> If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can >>>>> reuse one of these two VMs as the new

Re: Check for Updates broken?

as currently access. > > On 07.12.18 23:01, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On December 5, 2018 at 10:01 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > >> > >> On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can >

Re: Check for Updates broken?

gt;>> reuse one of these two VMs as the new updates server. >> We could try the OpenGrok Server. > Has this been tested? > Could someone on Infra give a little love to this task? > > Regards, > Pedro > > -

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On December 5, 2018 at 10:01 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > > If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can > > reuse one of these two VMs as the new updates server. > We could try the Ope

Re: Check for Updates broken?

On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can > reuse one of these two VMs as the new updates server. We could try the OpenGrok Server. - To

Re: Check for Updates broken?

unreachable from the affected systems? I mean, does > > $ soffice https://wiki.openoffice.org > $ soffice https://forum.openoffice.org > > give "Server error" from the machine where updates cannot be reached? > > If yes, we'll have to look into another environment

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On December 5, 2018 at 7:08 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Are the current VMs unreachable from the affected systems? I mean, does > > $ soffice https://wiki.openoffice.org > $ soffice https://forum.openoffice.org > > give "Server error" from the machine where u

Re: Check for Updates broken?

t; > Are the current VMs unreachable from the affected systems? I mean, does > > $ soffice https://wiki.openoffice.org > $ soffice https://forum.openoffice.org > > give "Server error" from the machine where updates cannot be reached? > > If yes, we'll have to l

Re: Check for Updates broken?

r" from the machine where updates cannot be reached? If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can reuse one of these two VMs as the new updates server. Regards, Andrea. - T

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 25, 2018 at 12:13 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > No need to download it again as it is already in your profile. Just add > it by using "Add..." > That doesn't work unless you have the oxt file There is

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Am 25.11.18 um 13:09 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > > >> > > This means that the program is getting version >> information from the server so some communication is passing through... >>> > You did a reinstall without deleting the profile? Probably you >>> updated >>

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Matthias > > > > This means that the program is getting version > information from the server so some communication is passing through... > > > > > You did a reinstall without deleting the profile? Probably you > > updated > some dictionary before and AOO just f

Re: Check for Updates broken?

must be cut over by Nov 30th we >> must prioritize. > Agreed. > Keep in mind that previous versions worked until 2-3 weeks ago > This problem also occurs on version 4.1.5 running on Windows XP (where no > updates to the OS occur) so any modification is on the server side. > &

Re: Check for Updates broken?

ed. Keep in mind that previous versions worked until 2-3 weeks ago This problem also occurs on version 4.1.5 running on Windows XP (where no updates to the OS occur) so any modification is on the server side. An interesting detail: I reinstalled version 4.1.5 on a Windows XP netbook and I do

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 24, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 24/11/2018 Pedro Lino wrote: >> Any news on this issue? Can this be solved by Infra or by someone >> on the PMC? I believe this issue should have some priority especially >> because it affects the Windows OS

Re: Check for Updates broken?

On 24/11/2018 Pedro Lino wrote: Any news on this issue? Can this be solved by Infra or by someone on the PMC? I believe this issue should have some priority especially because it affects the Windows OS users (the vast majority of the users)... It is a matter of virtual machines and policy. The

Re: Check for Updates broken?

um.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=95930 > > Can you (or someone else) ask Infra to provide one of the alternate solutions > you mentioned? > > On an intersting note: according to a freeware program I use under Windows to > check for updates (I disable automatic ch

Re: Check for Updates broken?

ou (or someone else) ask Infra to provide one of the alternate solutions you mentioned? On an intersting note: according to a freeware program I use under Windows to check for updates (I disable automatic checking for each program and run this once a week) more than half the AOO users who also use SU

Re: Check for Updates broken?

https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html   # Succeeds! > $ ./soffice https://fosdem.org  # Succeeds > $ curl -sviI --tlsv1.0 https://ooo-updates.apache.org/  # Fails > > Does the current explanation actually explain why the first command > succeeds on Fedora? (

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 19, 2018 at 5:17 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Does the current explanation actually explain why the first command > succeeds on Fedora? (of course, this also reflects in GUI, where the > check for updates only succeeds on Fedora). Not at all. If the problem was s

Re: Check for Updates broken?

lly explain why the first command succeeds on Fedora? (of course, this also reflects in GUI, where the check for updates only succeeds on Fedora). Can this change be reversed or an exception opened for AOO? Sure, we have multiple options available. Including moving this server to a small

Re: Check for Updates broken?

On 19.11.2018 10:11, Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Brane, all > >> On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote: >>> Does the Apache web server still support TLS version 1.0? The old >>> version of OpenSSL that we bundle with the Windows and Linux versions >>> doesn't support anything newer than

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Brane, all > On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > > Does the Apache web server still support TLS version 1.0? The old > > version of OpenSSL that we bundle with the Windows and Linux versions > > doesn't support anything newer than that. > > > It looks like you found the

Re: Check for Updates broken?

d >>> >>> $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html >>> will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL >>> issue). >>> >>> Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get >>>

Re: Check for Updates broken?

gt;> will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL >> issue). >> >> Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get >> updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the >> first one fails? >

Re: Check for Updates broken?

On 18.11.2018 18:41, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 18.11.2018 17:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Pedro Lino wrote: >>> However the AOO site does not specify any charset. Could that be the >>> problem? >> I don't think the charset is a major issue, but indeed (if I do the >> same test with openssl) there i

Re: Check for Updates broken?

On 18.11.2018 17:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Pedro Lino wrote: >> However the AOO site does not specify any charset. Could that be the >> problem? > > I don't think the charset is a major issue, but indeed (if I do the > same test with openssl) there is something interesting that can > probably be

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Pedro Lino wrote: However the AOO site does not specify any charset. Could that be the problem? I don't think the charset is a major issue, but indeed (if I do the same test with openssl) there is something interesting that can probably be submitted to Infra for investigation. On any system

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 18, 2018 at 2:48 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: > >     curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ > > Thanks, if the issue is with SSL this indeed helps in finding more > details. Still, curl will always work also on aff

Re: Check for Updates broken?

try with fosdem.org (that has a wildcard certificate too) it works even on the Ubuntu system (i.e., the one where I cannot get the updates): $ soffice https://fosdem.org/2019/ # Works, HTTPS with wildcard in OpenSSL/LibreSSL/GnuTLS/whateveryou'reusing on the affected systems. Correlating

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 18, 2018 at 12:00 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: > >     curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ The output is below * Trying 95.216.24.32... * Connected to www.openoffice.org (95.216.24.32) port 443 (#0) * found 148 c

Re: Check for Updates broken?

, since we haven't identified major > network-related issues so far (yes, one of the two server does not > respond to ping and traceroute, but I can get updates from it > nevertheless). I mean, of course it doesn't harm but we need to shed > more light, see below. > >>

Re: Check for Updates broken?

ates.apache.org/index.html > > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > issue). > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get > updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the > first one

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get > updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the > first one fails? Confirmed that only the first one fails. I always get the message (even when it didn't fail to open the page)

  1   2   3   >