t;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> чт, 21 окт. 2021 г. в 16:57, Dick Groskamp :
>>
>>>
>>> On 2021/10/21 11:08:33, Czesław Wolański
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
>>>
-)
>
> Regards,
> Czesław
>
>
>
>
>
>
> чт, 21 окт. 2021 г. в 16:57, Dick Groskamp :
>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/10/21 11:08:33, Czesław Wolański
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
>&g
the only one. :-)
Regards,
Czesław
чт, 21 окт. 2021 г. в 16:57, Dick Groskamp :
>
>
> On 2021/10/21 11:08:33, Czesław Wolański
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action
On 2021/10/21 11:08:33, Czesław Wolański wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=191333544
>
> The "Export to PDF" option produces the .pdf file but some Polish letters
>
e too, from time to time. ;‑)
Regards,
Czesław
чт, 21 окт. 2021 г. в 15:31, Matthias Seidel :
> Hi Czesław,
>
> Am 21.10.21 um 13:08 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> > Hi,
> >
> > AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/co
Hi Czesław,
Am 21.10.21 um 13:08 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi,
>
> AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=191333544
>
> The "Export to PDF" option produces the .pdf file but some Polish letters
>
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Czesław Wolański [mailto:czeslaw.wolan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 1:09 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Release Notes (pl) - missing letters in the exported
> .pdf file
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
AOO 4.1.11 Release Notes - Polish version
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=191333544
The "Export to PDF" option produces the .pdf file but some Polish letters
with diacritics
are missing. Export in Word format is correct.
File with screenshots is av
30 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Hi Jörg,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/8/21 8:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I inform you that in the release notes the wrong link
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=233429&query_form
Nevermind.
I see it's been edited.
Thanks,
Carl
On 10/8/21 9:30 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Jörg,
On 10/8/21 8:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
I inform you that in the release notes the wrong link
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=233429&query_format=advanced&res
Hi Jörg,
On 10/8/21 8:21 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
I inform you that in the release notes the wrong link
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=233429&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.10
is set and thi
Hello,
I inform you that in the release notes the wrong link
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?list_id=233429&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED&resolution=FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE&target_milestone=4.1.10
is set and this link should be correct:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/bug
On 2021-05-16 13:48, Marcus wrote:
> Am 15.05.21 um 18:49 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> Here is a link to a PDF of a draft of the Release Notes Template on
>> Confluence. The original intent of the template was to create a
>> consistent and professional look and feel to
Am 15.05.21 um 18:49 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Here is a link to a PDF of a draft of the Release Notes Template on
Confluence. The original intent of the template was to create a
consistent and professional look and feel to the documentation we
present to the public.
A number of changes have
Am 16.05.21 um 14:33 schrieb Dick Groskamp:
On 2021/05/15 16:49:46, "Keith N. McKenna" wrote:
Here is a link to a PDF of a draft of the Release Notes Template on
Confluence. The original intent of the template was to create a
consistent and professional look and feel to the docume
On 2021/05/15 16:49:46, "Keith N. McKenna" wrote:
> Here is a link to a PDF of a draft of the Release Notes Template on
> Confluence. The original intent of the template was to create a
> consistent and professional look and feel to the documentation we
> present to the
previously created release schedule, sorry haven't
>>> told about it yet.
>>>
>>> I remember that you wanted to create a new template structure for the
>>> release notes. Is this already done? Or is it coming later?
>>>
>> This reflects the new tem
Here is a link to a PDF of a draft of the Release Notes Template on
Confluence. The original intent of the template was to create a
consistent and professional look and feel to the documentation we
present to the public.
A number of changes have been made and I welcome all comments and
o create a new template structure for the
release notes. Is this already done? Or is it coming later?
This reflects the new template structure. I will also be sending a link
to a PDF file for all to comment on under its own thread.
Confluence is a Wiki system where everybody can do changes. A
new template structure for the
> release notes. Is this already done? Or is it coming later?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
Marcus;
This reflects the new template structure. I will also be sending a link
to a PDF file for all to comment on under its own thread.
Regards,
Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Keith, thanks for creating new notes.
I've added a missing space to the headline.
Also moved it to the previously created release schedule, sorry haven't
told about it yet.
I remember that you wanted to create a new template structure for the
release notes. Is this already done
I am devolving. ;-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Czesław
>
> As I remember correctly Release Notes for 3.4, 3.4.1 and 4.0.0 were
> pretty much free style. Version 4.0 was a major release with big
> enhancements, top of the list was the introduction of the side bar. In
> the
>
> Regards,
> Czesław
As I remember correctly Release Notes for 3.4, 3.4.1 and 4.0.0 were
pretty much free style. Version 4.0 was a major release with big
enhancements, top of the list was the introduction of the side bar. In
the context of a major Release the statements that you reference
Am 24.04.21 um 22:02 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 2021-04-24 05:19, Marcus wrote:
Am 24.04.21 um 10:59 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Release Notes 4.0 [*]
section "General Remarks", the 5th paragraph:
--
As always we welcome your feedback:
On 2021-04-24 05:19, Marcus wrote:
> Am 24.04.21 um 10:59 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
>> Release Notes 4.0 [*]
>> section "General Remarks", the 5th paragraph:
>>
>> --
>> As always we welcome your feedback:
>
um 10:59 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> > Release Notes 4.0 [*]
> > section "General Remarks", the 5th paragraph:
> >
> > --
> > As always we welcome your feedback:
> >
> > - Support questions are best dire
Am 24.04.21 um 10:59 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Release Notes 4.0 [*]
section "General Remarks", the 5th paragraph:
--
As always we welcome your feedback:
- Support questions are best directed to our community support forums.
- Bug report
Hi,
Release Notes 4.0 [*]
section "General Remarks", the 5th paragraph:
--
As always we welcome your feedback:
- Support questions are best directed to our community support forums.
- Bug reports (but not support questions) should go
something new
and hope
that you are not upset about that.
No need to be sorry whatsoever. I am utterly happy with your decision.
My command of German language feels the same way. ;‑)
:-)
May / should I delete the "ENTWURF - AOO 4.1.9 Release Notes (de)" page?
Yes, please free to del
asking
> >> before starting something new
> >> and hope
> >> that you are not upset about that.
> >
> > No need to be sorry whatsoever. I am utterly happy with your decision.
> > My command of German language feels the same way. ;‑)
>
> :-)
>
king
before starting something new
and hope
that you are not upset about that.
No need to be sorry whatsoever. I am utterly happy with your decision.
My command of German language feels the same way. ;‑)
:-)
May / should I delete the "ENTWURF - AOO 4.1.9 Release Notes (de)" page?
arting something new
> and hope
> that you are not upset about that.
No need to be sorry whatsoever. I am utterly happy with your decision.
My command of German language feels the same way. ;‑)
May / should I delete the "ENTWURF - AOO 4.1.9 Release Notes (de)" page?
Regards,
still be triggered. If that happens, please follow the
below steps."
IMHO there was no change since 4.1.8, so it's OK to use its text.
For me it's OK.
On the other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
download page (and Release Notes): Rev. 56108130a
the About box (menu "He
o use its text.
For me it's OK.
On the other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
download page (and Release Notes): Rev. 56108130a
the About box (menu "Help - About OpenOffice"): Rev. 561082130a
Thanks for the hint. Seems to be a little bug on the download wegpage.
I'l
other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
download page (and Release Notes): Rev. 56108130a
the About box (menu "Help - About OpenOffice"): Rev. 561082130a
Thanks for the hint. Seems to be a little bug on the download wegpage.
I'll fix it.
Marcus
сб, 27 февр. 2021 г
e since 4.1.8, so it's OK to use its text.
> For me it's OK.
>
>> On the other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
>>
>> download page (and Release Notes): Rev. 56108130a
>> the About box (menu "Help - About OpenOffice"): Rev. 561082130a
>
>
that happens, please follow the
below steps."
IMHO there was no change since 4.1.8, so it's OK to use its text.
For me it's OK.
On the other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
download page (and Release Notes): Rev. 56108130a
the About box (menu "Help - About OpenOffi
e to help guard against malware on Mac systems. The
Apache OpenOffice disk images are signed by Apache as required by Apple,
but Gatekeeper may still be triggered. If that happens, please follow the
below steps."
On the other hand: Did someone notice the difference?
download page (and Release Not
Am 26.02.21 um 21:12 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
As it was me who "started a fire", I prepared a kind of draft AOO 4.1.9
Release Notes (de).
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173087815
It definitely needs to be reviewed.
great, just 2 notes:
- To
Hi all,
As it was me who "started a fire", I prepared a kind of draft AOO 4.1.9
Release Notes (de).
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173087815
It definitely needs to be reviewed.
Regards,
Czesław
пт, 26 февр. 2021 г. в 19:07, Marcus :
> Am 26.0
21 um 01:05 schrieb Marcus:
Hi Joerg,
you have started this page to translate the release notes into German.
Do you still have an interest to do so or should others take over?
Thanks
Marcus
Am 23.02.21 um 20:10 schrieb Keith McKenna (Confluence):
There's *1 new edit* on this page
Hi Marcus,
Either someone else does the translation (shouldn't take too much time)
or we remove it completely...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.02.21 um 01:05 schrieb Marcus:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> you have started this page to translate the release notes into German.
> Do you still ha
Hi Joerg,
you have started this page to translate the release notes into German.
Do you still have an interest to do so or should others take over?
Thanks
Marcus
Am 23.02.21 um 20:10 schrieb Keith McKenna (Confluence):
There's *1 new edit* on this page
AOO 4.1.9 Release Note
t;>>
> >>>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50
;> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM
>>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
>>>> because of
Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
How about we make a blog post instead?
We can describe
What the impact is.
What Versions are affected.
Where our research is.
And what our plans are.
you mean in: https
y, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
>>> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
>>>
>>> How about we make a blog post instead?
>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: dave [mailto:b...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
>
> O
On 27/12/2020 14:38, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:13 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
>> be
On 27.12.20 15:29, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
That, Peter, I also do not think!
My formulations were not an outline taken in advance, but only 4 orders that
should be filled with info, as a basis, as an orientation for the actual text
of the blog post.
sure, I just thought if we follwo this way,
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:13 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:54 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big
> Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )
>
I don't think a FaQ Format would be the right way to write about this
issue. I suggest something along the lines:
Dear OpenOffice Users
Thank you for taking interest into OpenOffice and your ongoing support
over the years. As of late as you have heared through various channels,
an Issue ha
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus]
> How about we make a blog post instead?
Hello,
because I support Peter's suggestion of a blog post, I want to contribute here
also practically something to it by creating this thread here with the goal
that we gather here info/facts.
Anyone who knows something should please write it here i
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
>
, December 25, 2020 4:41 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: ooofo...@free.fr
Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
We became aware of the problem with the release of BigSur.
That just happened about the same time as the 4.1.8
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2020 4:41 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: ooofo...@free.fr
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How s
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2020 3:51 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed wit
Message-
>> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2020 3:45 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
>> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
>>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr]
> Sent: Friday, December 25, 2020 3:45 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
> because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)
>
&g
Am 25.12.20 um 15:44 schrieb Bidouille:
>> Unfortunately these problems became apparent after the
>> release of AOO 4.1.8
> I disagree.
> Some users have reported this bug with old builds (4.1.3 and 4.1.7 too).
And how does that contradict above sentence?!
>
> ---
> Unfortunately these problems became apparent after the
> release of AOO 4.1.8
I disagree.
Some users have reported this bug with old builds (4.1.3 and 4.1.7 too).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> However, we really should state this (known) Problem
> in our Release Notes.
Hello,
If there is no objection I will add the following to the release notes for AOO
4.1.8, starting 12/28/2020 at 5:00 PM (CET):
In the release notes under "Known Issues - For macOS users"
> I just hear in the forum that the update check in 4.1.8 works again.
>
> Does this correspond to
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124413 ?
No but rather that https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127789
-
To uns
Hello,
I just hear in the forum that the update check in 4.1.8 works again.
Does this correspond to https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124413 ?
I ask because I would like to note this in the release notes, because it is a
very significant bug fix (from the user's point of
rg.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> new a86f241 Use French Release Notes
> a86f241 is described below
>
> commit a86f24172675aeafd56016e18f766ba8fa2a1a50
> Author: mseidel
> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 18 17:10:05 2020 +0100
>
Am 12.11.20 um 08:15 schrieb Larry Gusaas:
On 2020-11-12 12:07 a.m., Czesław Wolański wrote:
Release Notes: section "Known Issues" ---> "For Mac Users"
bulleted list, last item of the 2nd level:
"Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice o
On 2020-11-12 12:07 a.m., Czesław Wolański wrote:
Hi,
Release Notes: section "Known Issues" ---> "For Mac Users"
bulleted list, last item of the 2nd level:
"Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice on
OSX [...]".
In 4.1.3 and 4.1.
Hi,
Release Notes: section "Known Issues" ---> "For Mac Users"
bulleted list, last item of the 2nd level:
"Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice on
OSX [...]".
In 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 Release Notes that item was the main level item i.e.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 10:56 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions about the release notes
> > 2.
> > Who can say something about the entry "AOO
Am 11.11.20 um 09:27 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
I started with a German translation of the release note, but I have the
following questions:
1.
Are there any new dictionaries?
(The statements under "Improvements/Enhancements" and "Language Support" seem
to be contradictory to each other).
to make
Hello,
I started with a German translation of the release note, but I have the
following questions:
1.
Are there any new dictionaries?
(The statements under "Improvements/Enhancements" and "Language Support" seem
to be contradictory to each other).
2.
Who can say something about the entry "AOO
Hello all,
Is useful know which is the difference between AOO_4.1.7 and AOO_4.1.8 for over
the release notes.
Regards,
Delio.
laced on "might".
>>> Better late then ever. ;-)
>>
>> Shouldn't that be "than never" then? ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Czesław
>>>
>>&g
; > > Regards,
> > > Czesław
> > >
> > >
> > > пн, 12 окт. 2020 г. в 16:10, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> > >
> > >> Hi Czesław,
> > >>
> > >> Am 12.10.20 um 13:36 schrieb Czesław
,
> > Czesław
> >
> >
> > пн, 12 окт. 2020 г. в 16:10, Matthias Seidel :
> >
> >> Hi Czesław,
> >>
> >> Am 12.10.20 um 13:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Draft AOO 4.1.8 Release Notes, sec
;-)
Shouldn't that be "than never" then? ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
>
> Regards,
> Czesław
>
>
> пн, 12 окт. 2020 г. в 16:10, Matthias Seidel :
>
>> Hi Czesław,
>>
>> Am 12.10.20 um 13:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
>>> Hi,
>>
aw,
>
> Am 12.10.20 um 13:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Draft AOO 4.1.8 Release Notes, section "Known Issues" - "For macOS
> users":
> >
> > *1. Space*
> > Space is needed in "password.This".
>
Hi Czesław,
Am 12.10.20 um 13:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi,
>
> Draft AOO 4.1.8 Release Notes, section "Known Issues" - "For macOS users":
>
> *1. Space*
> Space is needed in "password.This".
> (space is present in AOO 4.1.7 Release
Hi,
Draft AOO 4.1.8 Release Notes, section "Known Issues" - "For macOS users":
*1. Space*
Space is needed in "password.This".
(space is present in AOO 4.1.7 Release Notes)
*2. "than"*
I suspect that "than" is inappropriate in the sentence:
For Linux, Java7, for macOS, Java6
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 6:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2018 09:29 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 15 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Kay,
>>>
>>> Am 15.11.18 um 00:48 schrieb Kay Schenk:
Two things --
* I see localization was set up for Kabyle.
On 11/14/2018 09:29 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 15 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Kay,
Am 15.11.18 um 00:48 schrieb Kay Schenk:
Two things --
* I see localization was set up for Kabyle. So is this a new language
addition?
No, only locale data were added internally.
* some discussion and commit
On 15 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
> Am 15.11.18 um 00:48 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> Two things --
>> * I see localization was set up for Kabyle. So is this a new language
>> addition?
>
> No, only locale data were added internally.
>
>> * some discussion and commits about Java 8,
>> see:
4.1.6 branch near as I can tell.
> So...does AOO require Java 8 now or can Java 7 still be used?
>
> I may have more questions coming in the next day or so, but hopefully not
> many. I will make every attempt to get this ready by Fri afternoon, PST.
>
Kay
I already removed the Kab
Hi Kay,
Am 15.11.18 um 00:48 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Two things --
> * I see localization was set up for Kabyle. So is this a new language
> addition?
No, only locale data were added internally.
> * some discussion and commits about Java 8,
> see: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127876
>
Two things --
* I see localization was set up for Kabyle. So is this a new language
addition?
* some discussion and commits about Java 8,
see: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127876
Changes were committed to the 4.1.6 branch near as I can tell.
So...does AOO require Java 8 now or can Jav
On 12/26/2017 9:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> On Dec 25, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna
>> wrote:
>>
>> I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release
>> Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues.
>>
>> 1.
> On Dec 25, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release
> Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues.
>
> 1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9
Not
Hi Keith,
Am 25.12.2017 um 20:23 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release
> Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues.
>
> 1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9
Jim?
> 2.
I am in the process of doing the final clean-up of the 4.1.5 Release
Notes and have a couple of questions on the Known Issues.
1. Does macOS still need the legacy Apple Java 6 to recognize Java 9
2. Does the source package of 4.1.5 still have problems building on 32
bit Ubuntu 14.04 and similar
aries:
To my knowledge only en, de and pt were updated since 4.1.3.
this commit shows a different picture - at least for me:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341#c2
Marcus
Am 02.10.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Marcus:
Hi all,
Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the ne
is commit shows a different picture - at least for me:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341#c2
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>> Am 02.10.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the new A
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the new AOO
> 4.1.4 and
> Kay has also done some updates. As we are closer to a release
> I've now
> updated the notes with the newest information:
>
> https:
:
Hi all,
Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the new AOO 4.1.4
and Kay has also done some updates. As we are closer to a release I've
now updated the notes with the newest information:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.4+Release+Notes
Please revie
Hi Marcus,
Regarding dictionaries:
To my knowledge only en, de and pt were updated since 4.1.3.
Matthias
Am 02.10.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Marcus:
> Hi all,
>
> Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the new AOO 4.1.4
> and Kay has also done some updates. As we are closer
Hi all,
Keith has started to create the Release Notes for the new AOO 4.1.4 and
Kay has also done some updates. As we are closer to a release I've now
updated the notes with the newest information:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.4+Release+Notes
Please r
Hi Keith,
Am 10.09.2017 um 01:40 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> I have been reviewing the Release Notes for the 4.1.4 Release and have a
> couple of questions on the Known Issues section.
>
> 1. For developers: the source package of OpenOffice 4.1.4 will not build
> on 32-bit ver
Am 10.09.2017 um 01:40 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> I have been reviewing the Release Notes for the 4.1.4 Release and have a
> couple of questions on the Known Issues section.
>
> 1. For developers: the source package of OpenOffice 4.1.4 will not build
> on 32-bit versions of Ub
I have been reviewing the Release Notes for the 4.1.4 Release and have a
couple of questions on the Known Issues section.
1. For developers: the source package of OpenOffice 4.1.4 will not build
on 32-bit versions of Ubuntu 14.04 and similar distributions. The
source fails to build in main/svl
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
