Thank you Dave for the clarification.
Dylan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:28 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 23, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think the wording on the Buildbot info page should be changed from
> > "slaves" to something like "worker" or something
> On Feb 23, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think the wording on the Buildbot info page should be changed from
> "slaves" to something like "worker" or something like that in order to be
> culturally sensitive in this day and age.
We will have to see if we can get this
Hello,
I think the wording on the Buildbot info page should be changed from
"slaves" to something like "worker" or something like that in order to be
culturally sensitive in this day and age.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Buildbot+info
my 2c,
Dylan
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 a
I am sorry. I am just to slow at the moment.. I hope tonight I find time but I
am not sure. It depends how stressful my working day is.
Maybe we are to view that look at PRs. And do 4 eye principle.
Am 22. Februar 2021 18:24:07 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
>Hi Arrigo,
>
>Am 21.02.21 um 16:01
Hi Arrigo,
Am 22.02.21 um 19:28 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello Matthias,
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Arrigo,
>>
>> Am 21.02.21 um 16:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> please help me review and finalize PR 122:
>>> https://github.
Hello Matthias,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> Am 21.02.21 um 16:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > please help me review and finalize PR 122:
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122
> > as it should fix a top-priority
Hi Arrigo,
Am 21.02.21 um 16:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Dear All,
>
> please help me review and finalize PR 122:
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122
> as it should fix a top-priority AOO bug, and hopefully help us spot
> other similar problems in the future.
>
> Moreover, I would r