Thank you Dave for the clarification. Dylan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:28 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On Feb 23, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Dylan Pham <hail...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I think the wording on the Buildbot info page should be changed from > > "slaves" to something like "worker" or something like that in order to be > > culturally sensitive in this day and age. > > We will have to see if we can get this changed. It’s a Foundation resource > that uses other’s software. Please be patient and don’t take lack of change > as this project not being sensitive. Please keep in mind that we are > volunteers her. > > You should notice that OpenOffice is using “main” and “trunk” for the > default branch in our Git Repositories. We’ve made sure not to use “master”. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Buildbot+info > > > > > > my 2c, > > Dylan > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:39 AM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Arrigo, > >> > >> Am 22.02.21 um 19:28 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > >>> Hello Matthias, > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Arrigo, > >>>> > >>>> Am 21.02.21 um 16:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > >>>>> Dear All, > >>>>> > >>>>> please help me review and finalize PR 122: > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122 > >>>>> as it should fix a top-priority AOO bug, and hopefully help us spot > >>>>> other similar problems in the future. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moreover, I would really like to merge PR 111: > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/111 > >>>>> because I do work on openSUSE and I cannot build AOO without it. I > >>>>> dare proposing it as a "Good Thing" for me, and a "Mostly Harmless" > >>>>> change for anyone else. FWIW I could build 4.1.9 for Linux on the > >>>>> CentOS 5 version in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions with that commit > >>>>> included. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll be more than happy to answer anybody's concerns over both PR's > >>>>> either on GitHub, or on this list. > >>>> Yes, I am a bit puzzled that PRs are so neglected. > >>>> They are a great tool and can really speed up things. > >>>> > >>>> I have merged some of your PRs, but only those I could build and test > >>>> against the (fixed) problem. > >>> That's very kind of you. And I did receive some comments from other > >>> people as well, that I appreciate. > >>> > >>> But can we establish a sort of ``emergency exit'' in the > >>> "commit-then-review" process, like ``if no-one comments a PR it could > >>> be merged in X time''? A sort of lazy consensus? > >> I am not sure, since I really can't evaluate the quality of the code > >> (old and new one). > >>> > >>> Personally, I would really like to see the development branches go > >>> "live" with nightly builds. I see lots of people available to report > >>> bugs and test fixes, and I cannot submit anything to them for testing, > >>> mostly because I cannot build Windows releases! > >> > >> Regarding Windows builds: > >> > >> We have nightly builds of trunk and weekly builds for AOO42X: > >> > >> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html > >> > >> And you can always find my personal Test Builds here: > >> > >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/ > >> > >> If you are interested in building for Windows, I would be happy to help > >> you with it. > >> After all these years, I am still the only one that does release builds > >> for Windows and is able to sign them. Just for redundancy it would be > >> great to have a second person available. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Matthias > >> > >>> > >>> Thank you and best regards, > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
