Hello Matthias, On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Arrigo, > > Am 21.02.21 um 16:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > > Dear All, > > > > please help me review and finalize PR 122: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122 > > as it should fix a top-priority AOO bug, and hopefully help us spot > > other similar problems in the future. > > > > Moreover, I would really like to merge PR 111: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/111 > > because I do work on openSUSE and I cannot build AOO without it. I > > dare proposing it as a "Good Thing" for me, and a "Mostly Harmless" > > change for anyone else. FWIW I could build 4.1.9 for Linux on the > > CentOS 5 version in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions with that commit > > included. > > > > I'll be more than happy to answer anybody's concerns over both PR's > > either on GitHub, or on this list. > > Yes, I am a bit puzzled that PRs are so neglected. > They are a great tool and can really speed up things. > > I have merged some of your PRs, but only those I could build and test > against the (fixed) problem. That's very kind of you. And I did receive some comments from other people as well, that I appreciate. But can we establish a sort of ``emergency exit'' in the "commit-then-review" process, like ``if no-one comments a PR it could be merged in X time''? A sort of lazy consensus? Personally, I would really like to see the development branches go "live" with nightly builds. I see lots of people available to report bugs and test fixes, and I cannot submit anything to them for testing, mostly because I cannot build Windows releases! Thank you and best regards, -- Arrigo http://rigo.altervista.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
