Re: Question on Apache OpenOffice

Hi, Both programs should install side by side because they use different default install locations. However, the LibreOffice shell extensions could be overwritten by Apache OpenOffice, so I would suggest to do a "Custom Install" and deselect the "Windows Explorer Extension" found under "Opti

Re: Question on Apache OpenOffice

Good evening from Portugal! The short answer is yes. You can install OpenOffice now. Both will work. However there will be a "fight" to be associated with normal office file types (such as Open Document, Word, Excel, etc) This means that when you open a Word file with one Office (be it OpenOffi

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Dave Fisher wrote: Did you rewrite or reuse? If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright. T

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > > Dave Fisher wrote: >> Did you rewrite or reuse? >> If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the >> copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright. >> Th

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

Dave Fisher wrote: Did you rewrite or reuse? If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright. The unasked question is the license and you’ll have to choose the Creative Commons license plus d

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:39:52 -0500 "Keith N. McKenna" wrote: I am a bit out of my depth on Copyright Holder for the updated 4.1 User Guides should be. I see foure possible scenarios for this. 1) The ASF 2) The Project 3) The Documentation Team. 4) Listing the Individual C

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

Did you rewrite or reuse? If just a rewrite then copyright should be the ASF. If you reused then the copyright is both the ASF for the new work while retaining prior copyright. The unasked question is the license and you’ll have to choose the Creative Commons license plus decide if that allows

Re: Question on the Copyright Holder for the 4.1 User Docs

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:39:52 -0500 "Keith N. McKenna" wrote: > I am a bit out of my depth on Copyright Holder for the updated 4.1 User > Guides should be. I see foure possible scenarios for this. > > 1) The ASF > 2) The Project > 3) The Documentation Team. > 4) Listing the Individual Contributor

Re: Question

Hi Dolores, Please ignore the mail from John. Can you be a bit more specific about the change of margins? Is this in Writer? Regards,    Matthias Am 25.06.21 um 20:13 schrieb John Johnston: > I THINK YOU HAVE THE WRONG PERSON.  I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT YOU > ARE TALKING ABOUT. > > -

Re: Question

I THINK YOU HAVE THE WRONG PERSON. I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. -Original Message- From: Dolores Cheeks Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 1:04 PM To: dev Subject: Question Hello, I phoned Geek Squad the protection that I have on this computer because the margin of

Re: Question regarding build.pl

El mié., 30 de diciembre de 2020 6:25 p. m., Dylan Pham escribió: > Hello everyone, > > I was looking at this build script main/solenv/bin/build.pl and per the > attached screenshot, on line 2611, what does this line do? Was there > supposed to be a substitution operator at this line? Thanks. >

Re: Question regarding build.pl

Match - I think it is extracting the value between the single quotes into $1. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 30, 2020, at 4:25 PM, Dylan Pham wrote: > >  > Hello everyone, > > I was looking at this build script main/solenv/bin/build.pl and per the > attached screenshot, on line 2611, what does

Re: Question re Chromebook

Latest version works. Here is the guide how to do this: https://youtu.be/MJUUUp3ufN8 Am 1. Dezember 2020 19:52:08 MEZ schrieb Mel Earley <4308w...@gmail.com>: >What versions of OpenOffice will work on a Chromebook OS >Mel >Halifax >Canada

Re: Question about 4.1.8 Release Notes

Am 12.11.20 um 08:15 schrieb Larry Gusaas: On 2020-11-12 12:07 a.m., Czesław Wolański wrote: Release Notes: section "Known Issues" ---> "For Mac Users" bulleted list, last item of the 2nd level: "Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice on OSX [...]". In 4.1.3 and

Re: Question about 4.1.8 Release Notes

On 2020-11-12 12:07 a.m., Czesław Wolański wrote: Hi, Release Notes: section "Known Issues" ---> "For Mac Users" bulleted list, last item of the 2nd level: "Due to a known bug in Oracle Java installations of Apache OpenOffice on OSX [...]". In 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 Release Notes that item was the ma

Re: OS/2 (Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi Matthias, had a little time: [1] refers to the OS/2 EDM magazine about Object  Rexx which got introduced with OS/2 Warp by IBM. [1]  contains a link [2] to a brief article (10 pages) I wrote about 15 years ago which attempts to introduce the Rexx language to newbies and Open Object Rexx. [2

Re: Question ad Groovy implementation (Re: Beanshell Scripting

Hi Carl, On 15.07.2020 01:49, Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Rony, > > On 7/14/20 10:11 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> >> ... cut ... > > I'm planning a more formal announcement as soon as I finish the Readme's for > a couple of these but... > > There are a few inter-dependent projects. > >

Re: Question ad Groovy implementation (Re: Beanshell Scripting

Hi Rony, On 7/14/20 10:11 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Carl, On 13.07.2020 22:07, Carl Marcum wrote: ... cut ... Currently my Groovy macro is a standalone extension. We can discuss later after I announce it's information whether it could be added to the office at some point or left as a

OS/2 (Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi Matthias, On 14.07.2020 16:48, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Rony, > > Am 14.07.20 um 16:34 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> On 14.07.2020 16:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 14.07.20 um 16:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: Hi there, yesterday I intended to test the oo

Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

One more problem, observation: while running "unopkg" I experience the following error: e:\DropBox\Dropbox\xfer\mac>type problem.txt wu114217:Resources rony$ "/Applications/OpenOffice Developer Build.app/Contents/MacOS/unopkg" add -f --shared /Library/Frameworks/BSF4o oRexx.framework

Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi Rony, Am 14.07.20 um 16:34 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: > Hi Matthias, > > On 14.07.2020 16:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 14.07.20 um 16:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> yesterday I intended to test the ooRexx macro language oxt file against the >>> MacOS Developer Build >>

Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi Matthias, On 14.07.2020 16:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 14.07.20 um 16:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: >> Hi there, >> >> yesterday I intended to test the ooRexx macro language oxt file against the >> MacOS Developer Build >> (4.2) to test whether

Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi again, Am 14.07.20 um 16:14 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Rony, > > Am 14.07.20 um 16:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: >> Hi there, >> >> yesterday I intended to test the ooRexx macro language oxt file against the >> MacOS Developer Build >> (4.2) to test whether

Re: Question ad MacOS 4.2 Developer Build

Hi Rony, Am 14.07.20 um 16:03 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: > Hi there, > > yesterday I intended to test the ooRexx macro language oxt file against the > MacOS Developer Build > (4.2) to test whether is > fixed. > > As the install script that has b

Re: Question on Windows Step by Step Building Guide

On 12/8/2017 5:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > My solution is to do all file-changing svn operations, including > check-out, using the Cygwin command line svn, not TortoiseSVN. > Pat; A reasonable solution and most likely a useful skill to become re-acquainted with; however since it is 25+ years

Re: Question on Windows Step by Step Building Guide

My solution is to do all file-changing svn operations, including check-out, using the Cygwin command line svn, not TortoiseSVN. On 12/8/2017 2:04 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: For a number of reasons I am considering embarking into the wonderful world of building AOO on Windows. In the section on

Re: Question about saving Documents

Great! I'll give it a try. Thanks for your help. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 21.02.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Greg Kashuba: > >> I got an updated newer Mac Book Pro and loaded my prior computer software >> and configurations from the older one. One thing that did not transfer

Re: Question about saving Documents

Am 21.02.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Greg Kashuba: I got an updated newer Mac Book Pro and loaded my prior computer software and configurations from the older one. One thing that did not transfer was Office for Mac which I got thru my employer GEICO at a substantial discount. I don’t use the program

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Also want to post my bootstrap log. Seems like some resources are out of date. Can someone update them? $ ./bootstrap ./bootstrap: line 37: unalias: nmake: not found ./bootstrap: line 38: unalias: gunzip: not found Include locations: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.22/i686-cygwin-threads-64int /usr/li

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

In the end I figured out I was missing perl-Net-SSLeay. Since perl-LWP-Protocol depends on perl-Net-SSLeay (according to the screenshot), apy-cyg should install perl-Net-SSLeay while installing perl-LWP-Protocol, but it did not. I suggest let configure output perl -e 'use LWP::Protocol::https', i

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi Install the perl-LWP-Protocol-https package using Cygwin or apt-cyg. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Hong wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > The error is still the same, except for the wording is a little different. > > > > Attached the config.log and output. In the meantime I will be looking at > th

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi Damjan, The error is still the same, except for the wording is a little different. Attached the config.log and output. In the meantime I will be looking at the script as well. If I find something wrong, I will let you know.​ On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Firs

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Firstly, it looks like there's a bug in our configure script: the dependencies that are checked for in bulk, are different from the dependencies that are tested individually and reported as missing, so a missing dependency can be wrongly reported. I've just committed a fix for it, so please "svn u

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi all, Now I am building AOO under Win7. Most of my settings are exactly the same as the instruction. I keep seeing this package missing error when I did "./configure". Can someone please help? I already kept trying the entire afternoon. ​ As you can see I did a check, it was installed, but ju

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi again, I now encountered this error, checking for PSDK files... configure: error: Some (all?) PSDK files not found, please check if all needed Platform SDKs are installed or use --with-psdk-home . I suspect it was that I installed Windows SDK v10, or maybe that I did not install under the def

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Thanks, will try to find it. On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > The "autoconf" tool is part of Cygwin. > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Hong wrote: > > > As in my screenshot, I did not see an autoconf file in my download as > well. > > I was curious why was it too. A

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

The "autoconf" tool is part of Cygwin. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Hong wrote: > As in my screenshot, I did not see an autoconf file in my download as well. > I was curious why was it too. Autoconf is a project file, not a Cygwin > command/tool? > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Damjan J

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

As in my screenshot, I did not see an autoconf file in my download as well. I was curious why was it too. Autoconf is a project file, not a Cygwin command/tool? On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Please run "autoconf" first, which will generate "configure" from " >

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi Please run "autoconf" first, which will generate "configure" from " configure.in". Damjan On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Hong wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying to build AOO 4.1.3 on a Windows machine. > > My source code was from this page, https://openoffice.apache.org/ > downloads.html

Re: Question Regarding Limitations

If you use the internal database, I believe that you are using HSQLDB. I expect that this stores the entire DB in memory (not sure about that), but if so, then you are memory limited. If you use some other DB as the back-end and only use Base as the front-end, then your limitations will be r

Re: Question about spell check

Am 10/04/2016 10:17 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I downloaded and installed Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) an

Re: Question about spell check

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:17:49 -0700 Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >> I downloaded and installed > >> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when > >> I first started it, it ac

Re: Question about spell check

On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I downloaded and installed Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected "colour" (English spelling). I thought p

Re: Question about spell check

Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I downloaded and installed Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected "colour" (English spelling). I thought perhaps it picked up my previous use of

Re: Question about spell check

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:56:14 -0700 Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 10/4/2016 12:49 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:44:51 -0700 > > Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > >> I downloaded and installed > >> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when > >> I fir

Re: Question about spell check

On 10/4/2016 12:49 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:44:51 -0700 Patricia Shanahan wrote: I downloaded and installed Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected "colour" (English spelli

Re: Question about spell check

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:44:51 -0700 Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I downloaded and installed > Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when > I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected > "colour" (English spelling). > > I thought perhaps it picked

Re: Question: Naming the dev/openoffice/4.1.3 folders

On 9/26/2016 9:41 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I've been puzzling about the folder names. Let me test my understanding. If all of the dev/openoffice/4.1.3/ files being uploaded become RC1, will it be by renaming the folde

Re: Question: Naming the dev/openoffice/4.1.3 folders

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:13:08AM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I've been puzzling about the folder names. Let me test my understanding. > > If all of the dev/openoffice/4.1.3/ files being uploaded become RC1, will it > be by renaming the folder (e.g., from 4.1.3 to 4.1.3-rc1) without chan

Re: Question about binary upload process

Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suspect if I try to personally push all the artifacts, it will take a lot longer because of the limitations of my home PCs, and cable supplier. I'm supposed to get "up to" 150 Mbps, but I don't think I get that all the time. If your upload speed is in that order of ma

Re: Question about binary upload process

On 9/9/2016 3:23 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: Am 09/09/2016 04:38 PM, schrieb Dave Brondsema: On 9/8/16 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 2) Whoever is in the best position to do so, uploads the binaries to the ASF. This can be done also by multiple people, who upload to different s

Re: Question about binary upload process

Marcus wrote: Am 09/09/2016 04:38 PM, schrieb Dave Brondsema: On 9/8/16 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 2) Whoever is in the best position to do so, uploads the binaries to the ASF. This can be done also by multiple people, who upload to different subdirs here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: Question about binary upload process

Am 09/09/2016 04:38 PM, schrieb Dave Brondsema: On 9/8/16 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Patricia Shanahan wrote: we have a lot of binaries to upload. Could someone with experience or knowledge of the process tell me a bit about how it is done, how long it takes, and what, if anything, it cost

Re: Question about binary upload process

On 9/8/16 6:31 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> we have a lot of binaries to upload. >> Could someone with experience or knowledge of the process tell me a bit >> about how it is done, how long it takes, and what, if anything, it costs >> ASF? > > Sure. This changed just da

Re: Question about binary upload process

Patricia Shanahan wrote: we have a lot of binaries to upload. Could someone with experience or knowledge of the process tell me a bit about how it is done, how long it takes, and what, if anything, it costs ASF? Sure. This changed just days before 4.1.2, but it still holds. 1) You create the b

RE: [QUESTION] Dependency on OpenSSL

Don, Thank you for the clarity. That is exactly what I needed to know. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 14:59 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: [QU

Re: [QUESTION] Dependency on OpenSSL

Hi Dennis; I recall discussions of OpenSSL and updating our dependency on it to a better/patched version. What I don't know is whether the binaries that are built and distributed directly by the project incorporate OpenSSL in any manner? Can anyone clear that up? 1. Do our built binaries

Re: [QUESTION] Dependency on OpenSSL

On 8 Jun, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I recall discussions of OpenSSL and updating our dependency on it to a > better/patched version. > > What I don't know is whether the binaries that are built and distributed > directly by the project incorporate OpenSSL in any manner? > > Can anyone clear

RE: [QUESTION] Karma for www.openoffice.org contribution and editing

Thank you, Kay and Keith. That is what I vaguely sensed. The explicit information is great. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 12:34 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [

Re: [QUESTION] Karma for www.openoffice.org contribution and editing

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > We have arrangements for non-committers to contribute to the CWiki > and the MediaWiki, even the project Blog. > > In terms of requesting Help Wanted on topics related to > www.openoffice.org, is there a similar prospect or must all > contribution to the web site be by

Re: [QUESTION] Karma for www.openoffice.org contribution and editing

On 02/19/2016 08:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > We have arrangements for non-committers to contribute to the > CWiki and the MediaWiki, even the project Blog. > > In terms of requesting Help Wanted on topics related to > www.openoffice.org, is there a similar prospect or must all > contributi

Re: Question

Am 18.01.2016 um 22:45 schrieb Mayela Muniz: > > Can openoffice most recent version save a word document in a .docx format? > Thanks > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional comman

RE: Question

@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Question > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 18/01/2016 22:23, Detlef Nannen wrote: > > > OO can write docx? Really? Is there an extension? > > It is built-in. > > However, usage of D

Re: Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/01/2016 22:23, Detlef Nannen wrote: > OO can write docx? Really? Is there an extension? It is built-in. However, usage of DocX is highly discouraged, due to Microsoft's defective by design coding philosophy, which in this case is manifest by

Re: Question

Hi Stati, OO can write docx? Really? Is there an extension? -- Detlef Am 18.01.2016 um 22:59 schrieb stati: Mayela Muniz: Can openoffice most recent version save a word document in a .docx format? Thanks yes it is possible!

Re: Question

Mayela Muniz: > > Can openoffice most recent version save a word document in a .docx format? > Thanks > yes it is possible! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

Am 01/05/2016 08:55 PM, schrieb Mathias Röllig: In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ and /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at least can-confirm-rights. Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't can-confirm-rights) shou

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

A complex interface with many fields can deter users from reporting bugs and suggesting improvements. The reporting process should be the quickest and easiest possible. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Marcus wrote: it won't change anything for us if we limit the usage of these fields. when > the

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:59:51 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 01/05/2016 11:55 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: > >>> In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ > >>> and > >>> /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at > >>> least > >>> can-confirm-rights. >

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

On 01/05/2016 11:55 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: >>> In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ >>> and >>> /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at >>> least >>> can-confirm-rights. >>> >>> Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ and /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at least can-confirm-rights. Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't can-confirm-rights) shouldn't can change the defaults! (same for /Develo

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

Am 01/05/2016 02:43 PM, schrieb Mathias Röllig: Hello! In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ and /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at least can-confirm-rights. Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't can-confirm-righ

Re: [QUESTION] rights to change Priority, Importance and Severity of an issue

Mathias Röllig wrote: > Hello! > > In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ and > /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at least > can-confirm-rights. > > Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't > can-confirm-rights) shouldn'

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Having recently looked at our Java UNO binding, it occurred to me that another advantage of Java 7 would be that we could update our Java UNO base classes to implement AutoCloseable, allowing try-with-resources to be used to manage UNO reference counting precisely and delete unused objects as soon

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 12/19/2015 01:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> ​For some reason, given Oliver's desire and urging to change to >> Java 7 in >> Windows back in August of 2013, I was under the impression that >> since that >> time, at least the Windows version was built with Java 1.7. ​ > >

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Kay Schenk wrote: ​For some reason, given Oliver's desire and urging to change to Java 7 in Windows back in August of 2013, I was under the impression that since that time, at least the Windows version was built with Java 1.7. ​ I've re-read the discussion at http://markmail.org/message/4ieda3

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 17/11/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On 11/17/2015 02:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> Java 6 went out of update status quite some time ago -- Feb. 2013 -- >>> and this is still being used for our Linux builds, and Windows >>> builds if our

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 17/11/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/17/2015 02:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Java 6 went out of update status quite some time ago -- Feb. 2013 -- and this is still being used for our Linux builds, and Windows builds if our current binaries are produced with the same configuration as the buildbot co

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Hi, > OK, it's been a few weeks now and I'd like to get back to this. > Are there any objections to using Java 8 instead of the combination > of Java 6 and 7 that we have now? sorry for late reply, OS/2 build is using java 1.6 and this is the most recent JRE available. thanks, -- Bye,

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 11/19/2015 04:01 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 11/17/2015 11:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> Building AOO with Java 8's very strict javadoc tool was fixed in SVN trunk >> only, by r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and r1697312, so yes it >> should work well for building AOO now, and

Using Maven (was RE: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?)

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 06:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need > updating? > [ ... ] > Don't forget Ma

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 11/19/2015 08:47 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 11/17/2015 11:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Building AOO with Java 8's very strict javadoc tool was fixed in SVN trunk only, by r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and r1697312, so ye

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 11/17/2015 11:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Building AOO with Java 8's very strict javadoc tool was fixed in SVN > trunk > > only, by r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and r1697312, so yes it > > should work well for building

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 11/17/2015 11:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Building AOO with Java 8's very strict javadoc tool was fixed in SVN trunk > only, by r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and r1697312, so yes it > should work well for building AOO now, and it's the only version I've been > testing for months

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Building AOO with Java 8's very strict javadoc tool was fixed in SVN trunk only, by r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and r1697312, so yes it should work well for building AOO now, and it's the only version I've been testing for months on FreeBSD. Base works, wizards work, beanshell scripts w

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Am 11/17/2015 11:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > > On 11/17/2015 02:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> We seem to have a number of numer of Java related discussions of >> late. Here's another one -- the Java version we're using for builds. >> >> Java 6 went out of update status quite some time ago -- Feb.

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

Am 11/17/2015 11:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 11/17/2015 02:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: We seem to have a number of numer of Java related discussions of late. Here's another one -- the Java version we're using for builds. Java 6 went out of update status quite some time ago -- Feb. 2013 -- and

Re: [QUESTION/DISCUSSION] Does our required Java version need updating?

On 11/17/2015 02:17 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > We seem to have a number of numer of Java related discussions of > late. Here's another one -- the Java version we're using for builds. > > Java 6 went out of update status quite some time ago -- Feb. 2013 -- > and this is still being used for our Linu

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

hat all considerations can be addressed. > > - Dennis > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org] >> Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 00:58 >> To: Apache OO >> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)? &

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:10 AM, toki wrote: > On 15/11/2015 20:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > Please be more specific. I can't tell from the previous post what you > mean by deserializing untrusted code. > > There are a string of known zero day exploits that Oracle, for whatever > reason,

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

On 15/11/2015 20:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Please be more specific. I can't tell from the previous post what you mean > by deserializing untrusted code. There are a string of known zero day exploits that Oracle, for whatever reason, has not released patches for, despite exploits having be

RE: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

tions can be addressed. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 00:58 > To: Apache OO > Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)? > > Let's examine porting AOO to Java in mo

RE: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

Patricia: > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 11:46 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)? > > I would be strongly opposed to deserializing untrus

Re: Question relating to a problem in Open Office

Thank you for your inquiry.  I have copied in the OpenOffice folks to this email to prompt a quick reply to your question. Have a nice day,~MelissaExecutive Assistant From: SOUNDARAM PADMANABHAN To: "d...@community.apache.org" Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:58 AM Subject: Question re

RE: [QUESTION] How Many Pre-Built Binaries are Enough?

se-related distribution pipeline issue for binaries is for all of them. Am I missing something? > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 23:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [QUESTION] How Ma

Re: [QUESTION] How Many Pre-Built Binaries are Enough?

On 21/10/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: 4 flavors for Linux, taking 67% 1 flavor for MacOS, for 18% 1 flavor for Windows (win32 x86), for 15%. ... when is it time to reduce those that represent inordinate demands to the needs for QA, distribution, and support? The time is now. Not in

64-bit AOO for Windows (was RE: [QUESTION] Usability of Non-Optional Java Dependencies)

ea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 14:14 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Usability of Non-Optional Java Dependencies > > On 01/11/2015 Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > 1. We don't have a Win64 version of AOO available for

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

I would be strongly opposed to deserializing untrusted code - it is full of problems. On 11/8/2015 11:14 AM, toki wrote: On 08/11/2015 14:32, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I am just getting started on AOO, and don't know the history of this discussion, Pretty much since Sun purchased StarWriter,

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

On 08/11/2015 14:32, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >I am just getting started on AOO, and don't know the history of this discussion, Pretty much since Sun purchased StarWriter, there have been proposals to make OpenOffice.org Java only. If one considers NeoOffice to be a Java fork, then it is the only

Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?

On 11/08/2015 05:19 AM, #PATHANGI JANARDHANAN JATINSHRAVAN# wrote: > Hi, I am pretty much a noob and have only started out > contributing, but may I ask why moving to Java from C++ is being > considered? This migration will take effort and time, and I was > of the understanding that C++ code runs

  1   2   3   >