On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:59:51 -0800 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 01/05/2016 11:55 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: > >>> In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/ > >>> and > >>> /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at > >>> least > >>> can-confirm-rights. > >>> > >>> Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't > >>> can-confirm-rights) shouldn't can change the defaults! > >>> > >>> (same for /Developer Difficulty/) > >>> > >>> > >>> Is this possible? > >>> > >>> What do you think about? > >> > >> It's up to us (developer, QA engineer, etc.) to evaluate the real > >> priority/urgency and then to take further steps. > > > > > > That's the reason, why. +1 I also agree with Mathias. The assessment of the priority of a bug/enhancement proposal is best not left to the reporter as most reporters (judging by Forum experience) see their subject as being of super super importance and worthy of immediate implementation! Rory > > +1 I agree with Mathias. > Having "canconfirm" seems like a reasonable threshold. Maybe > additional procedures can be discussed on the qa list, and hopefully > documented. > > > -- > -------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, > anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending." > -- Carl Bard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
