On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote:
> > To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can
> get
> > VMs if we want to and manage them ourself.
>
> That sound interesting. Can you outline the proced
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote:
> To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can get
> VMs if we want to and manage them ourself.
That sound interesting. Can you outline the procedure to get one, or
point to the respective documentation?
Regards
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2015 11:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> Hello;
>>
>> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
>> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular
> since it'
On 03/26/2015 12:03 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
>> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
>> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely
On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular
> since it's the last ver
