On 1/2/2013 2:25 AM, janI wrote:
Andrea:
thx for your observations.
With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for
statistics.
I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I
want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (
Andrea:
thx for your observations.
With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for
statistics.
I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I
want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (or so I
have been told) merge it to
On 01.01.2013 23:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
janI wrote:
I might be wrong but do we e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a statistic over our build through time ?
Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-
janI wrote:
I might be wrong but do we e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a statistic over our build through time ?
Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-commits/201301.mbox/%3c20130101075333.41945c0
I did know that we use the machines for building:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
But it seemed to me we could integrate deeper using e.g. continum and
sonar, to get better monitoring and reporting. I might be wrong but do we
e.g.
- get automatic mail when a build fails ?
- have a stati
Jan,
On Dec 31, 2012, at 12:11 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> excuse me I did NOT say that anybody did a bad job! on the contrary I
> think a lot of people do a real big job I simply try to make the job
> easier. but I do understand when a polite question is unwanted.
How did my answer to And
excuse me I did NOT say that anybody did a bad job! on the contrary I
think a lot of people do a real big job I simply try to make the job
easier. but I do understand when a polite question is unwanted.
sorry for suggestion a possible improvement that will not happen again.
Jan i
Den 31/
Hi Andrew,
On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 12/31/2012 2:09 AM, janI wrote:
>> Is there a reason why we use our own buildbot and not one of the infra
>> supported ones, like e.g. Continuum.
> We /are/ using the ASF buildbot infrastructure. So I'm kind of confused by
> the
On 12/31/2012 2:09 AM, janI wrote:
Is there a reason why we use our own buildbot and not one of the infra
supported ones, like e.g. Continuum.
We /are/ using the ASF buildbot infrastructure. So I'm kind of confused
by the question.
check http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
Also, the dec
