Andrea: thx for your observations.
With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for statistics. I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (or so I have been told) merge it to trunk and maybe be a pain for all others, an alternative (which is seen in other build systems) is a possibility to register a branch for a single night-compile. but I will leave that theme to others. Jan I. On 1 January 2013 23:07, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > janI wrote: > >> I might be wrong but do we e.g. >> - get automatic mail when a build fails ? >> - have a statistic over our build through time ? >> > > Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example > > http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/openoffice-** > commits/201301.mbox/%**3C20130101075333.41945C00F8@**aegis.apache.org%3E<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-commits/201301.mbox/%3c20130101075333.41945c0...@aegis.apache.org%3E> > > I don't know if we have a handy way to see the build history and not just > the latest build status displayed at > http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/> > > > I think the job being done today is great, and was in my own (obviously >> not >> too elegant) way just trying to see if we could improve. >> > > I didn't see anything inappropriate in the requests and reactions about > the buildbot so far... it's normal to ask, it's normal to expect easy > fixes, and it's normal that more challenging changes are accepted or denied > based on discussion with people who are doing that work. > > Regards, > Andrea. >
