On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
> tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his
> real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from
> the iTune
On 12/02/2014 05:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
>>> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones
Am 12/03/2014 02:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
from the
On 03/12/2014 Simon Phipps wrote:
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his
real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from
the iTunes store now he's seen what t
+1 and +1 on Kay's idea.
2014-12-03 0:23 GMT+01:00 Kay Schenk :
>
> On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
> > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
> > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoff
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> I think we should be contacting Quick Office Pro about changing their
> support information if we haven't already.
>
I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He
tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, tha
> On 3 Dec 2014, at 9:15 am, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
>> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon wrote:
>>
>> On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>>> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
>>
>> That is the name of the software.
>> I've seen three or four different names for the
Marcus wrote:
In general +1. But I would like to see the complete text that should be
used as general message when rejecting mails. @Andrea: Can you state
this in a separate paragraph?
Something like http://markmail.org/message/vsonyy6jhnrgn7uq (with the
obvious minor adjustments):
---
That
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
>> Recall that Google owns Quickoffice.
>
> I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice
> moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed.
>
> Lee
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Recall that Google owns Quickoffice.
I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice
moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed.
Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is.
>
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
>> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
>
> That is the name of the software.
> I've seen three or four different names for the vendor.
>
>> Who then is getting this money?
>
> Scammers
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
That is the name of the software.
I've seen three or four different names for the vendor.
> Who then is getting this money?
Scammers.
jonathon
* English - detected
* English
* English
sign
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 15:23
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[ ... ]
> Since there are
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
> >> level? Detect the incoming link based on the refe
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
>> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
>> from the offending website and then red
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server
> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming
> from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage
> where we explain to the use
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
> unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
>
> They link to http://openoffice.org for
Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[...]
Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be
too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree
that "Quick Office Pro" posts can be rejected with the
> On 02 Dec2014, at 18:23, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
>> unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
>> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id88901151
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally
> unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is
> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8
>
> They link to http://openoffice.org for user s
20 matches
Mail list logo
