> On 3 Dec 2014, at 9:15 am, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> 
>>> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”.
>> 
>> That is the name of the software.
>> I've seen three or four different names for the vendor.
>> 
>>> Who then is getting this money? 
>> 
>> Scammers.
> 
> Well, maybe. Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. They distribute their 
> incorporated version as Google Docs, even for iOS. It is possible that the 
> Lee Elman I’ve contacted via LinkedIn is a “scammer.” But also perhaps not. 
> Apple’s iTunes Store is, as I noted, hardly the garden of sanity one might 
> hope to find. 

I’m willing to bet a lot of money that this is a scammer. There are literally 
hundreds of rip-off apps on the app store re-using common names, some even 
being exact copies of other apps which are stripped of their DRM and re-signed 
using the scammer’s certificate. I myself have been burnt by this, both by 
people selling copies of UX Write under different names, and also using the UX 
Write name to sell a different app (which was a copy of Dataviz’s Documents to 
Go).

Apple don’t care. You have to put in a *lot* of effort for them to take down or 
fix a case of infringement (in my case this meant personally meeting with app 
store representatives at WWDC). Usually they’ll just refer you to their legal 
department, who will then ask you to resolve the issue directly with the 
developer. And in this case it’s not even the OpenOffice trademark being 
violated - IANAL, but I would assume an incorrect link wouldn’t qualify.

Probably the only viable way to get it changed is to submit a request to 
http://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/appstorenotices/ 
<http://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/appstorenotices/> and with 
luck they will give you the email address of the person who uploaded it. Then 
that person can be contacted and asked to change the link (which shouldn’t make 
any difference to them as they can continue to make money off of the 
QuickOffice trademark). The actual trademark violation is a separate issue, and 
one for Google/Apple to deal with.

--
Dr. Peter M. Kelly
kelly...@gmail.com
http://www.kellypmk.net/

PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
(fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)

Reply via email to