> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. > > I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice > moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. > > Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is. > >> The issue that concerns us, Apache OpenOffice, is narrow. >> Whom we complain to, however, implies a larger issue. Eg, do we > complain to Apple? To Google? to both? I suggested both. > > Attorney-General of the State of California, for violation of the > consumer protection laws in the States of California. > > (There are some advantages to states that think that their legal > jurisdiction encompasses the entire known and unknown multiverse, > regardless of what residents and claimants of other legal jurisdictions > think about that presumption.) > > jonathon > > >
j— I agree with you. I’d like, however, for the other hugely rich companies to do their bit and put their houses in order, as the disorder is affecting us, an open source entity with nothing like the resources they have. Laws in this case may be (ideally) impartial but getting the legal machinery to move usually requires big resources. Cheers, louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
