On 12/08/2014 06:07 AM, FR web forum wrote:
> I bump this thread
>
>> I just created a saved search -- registered user -- with 4.1.x regressions:
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=16&namedcmd=4.1.x%20regressions&remaction=run&sharer_id=7
> Can we add a meta i
I bump this thread
> I just created a saved search -- registered user -- with 4.1.x regressions:
>https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=16&namedcmd=4.1.x%20regressions&remaction=run&sharer_id=7
Can we add a meta issue to listed most annoying bugs?
--
On 07/11/14 23:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810
>> too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already
>
> Good, thanks!
>
>>> Could at least you take
On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810
too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already
Good, thanks!
Could at least you take screenshots while you import Sinhala? Then maybe
someone
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> [...]
> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
[...]
> 2) Fixes for any critical bugs, especially any introduced in AOO
> 4.1.1. Do we know yet which bugs these are? Do we have a short list
> of the most critical ones?
>
I know that's not
On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala
>>> (si) was requested two weeks ago and
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l
On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala
(si) was requested two weeks ago and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/extras/l10n/source/si/
hasn't been imported yet.
The natural wa
On 10/29/2014 01:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 28/10/14 18:07, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
>
On 28/10/14 18:07, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on the translation. Why should we
On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
>>> interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
>>> where nobody is working on? I
On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
>> interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
>> where nobody is working on? I don't get it.
>
> That was an example, but still it
On 10/27/2014 01:33 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
>> interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
>> where nobody is working on? I don't get it.
>
> That was an example, but st
On 10/24/2014 11:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
>
> I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
> and actually the two can work together really well.
>
> I would like to streamline our processes and rem
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or
interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages
where nobody is working on? I don't get it.
That was an example, but still it is one improvement that needs to be
done. Why? Becaus
On 24/10/14 20:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
>
> I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
> and actually the two can work together really well.
>
> I would like to streamline our processes and remove bot
On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release
I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release
and actually the two can work together really well.
I would like to streamline our processes and remove bottlenecks and
dependencies on non-Apache systems. In
Am 10/24/2014 10:29 AM, schrieb RA Stehmann:
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
wrote:
> On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
> > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to
> have.
> >>
> >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
> >>
> >> 1) Whatever new
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
>> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>>
>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>>
>> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
>> course
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
>> On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>>>
>>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>>>
>>> 1) Whatever new languages/language upd
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote:
> On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
>> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>>
>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>>
>> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
>> course dictionary upd
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote:
> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>
> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>
> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
> course dictionary updates.
>
> 2) Fixes for any critical bugs, e
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
>
> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
>
> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
> course dictionary updates.
>
> 2) Fixes for any criti
+1
I think a 4.1.2 would also be a good mentoring/training process for an
additional Release Manager or two.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:16
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2
A short
For #3, it's a good idea.
If you want any help, i'm volonteer
See you
Sylvain DENIS
AOO Belgium
Le 23/10/14 18:16, Rob Weir a écrit :
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language upd
A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have.
Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing:
1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of
course dictionary updates.
2) Fixes for any critical bugs, especially any introduced in AOO
4.1.1. Do we know ye
26 matches
Mail list logo
