On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
> For some reason that bogus file is g
Hi Don,
Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>> Yep. That
Hi Don, Matthias, all
> On 08/26/2020 6:09 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> I just updated AOO418 with the fix. You should be able to successfully
> build and run --without-system-stdlibs.
I have successfully compiled 418 under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 (without any
system-stdlibs switch, which I assume defaults
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>>
On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>>
>>> Yep. That fixed
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>
>> Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me th
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>
> Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me that an extra file
> prevents the progr
> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me that an extra file prevents
the program from working... Maybe this is part of
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
> /opt/open
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
> /opt/open
Hi Don
> On 08/25/2020 8:29 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> For me, it goes through the registration process and then I can create
> and save a writer document. If I exit, I can reopen the document from
> the command line. Looks like it works.
Sounds like a good one ;)
Can you upload it somewhere and
On 25 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Don
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
>>> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
>> After upd
Hi Matthias
> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
Didn't think about that :)
/opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
/opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid ELF head
Hi Pedro,
Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
>> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
> After updating with your latest changes and hacking a b
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418
>> and using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
>
> After updating with your latest changes and hacking a bit with the
> li
Hi Don
> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
After updating with your latest changes and hacking a bit with the libgcc file
mentioned in the subject, compili
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2020 3:47 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> It's one of the bug fixes that I
>> plan to cherry-pick for AOO418 tonight.
>
> Excellent! Thanks!
>
>> What version of OpenJDK are you using? I'm seeing a fair amount of
>> fallout from OpenJDK 11.
>
> I have both
> On 08/25/2020 3:47 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> It's one of the bug fixes that I
> plan to cherry-pick for AOO418 tonight.
Excellent! Thanks!
> What version of OpenJDK are you using? I'm seeing a fair amount of
> fallout from OpenJDK 11.
I have both 8 and 11
sudo update-alternatives --config ja
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
>> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
>> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
>>
On 24 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>> Hi Don, all
>>
>>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Is this a parallel build?
>>
>> Switched to single thread building
>>
>> build --all
>>
>> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>> /source/op
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
Hi Don
> On 08/24/2020 4:58 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> The actual error should show up as "error: " in the build output.
The error messages and compiling stop at a completely different step on each
run even if I do a dmake clean and repeat the exact same 3 steps.
Adding --enable-verbose did not ma
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
> /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/
Hi Don, all
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build?
Switched to single thread building
build --all
when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
/source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
and restarted with build --all:icu
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
> cppuhelper is listed as a dependency
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Ciao Rigo
>
>> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
>> > ELF header
>> >
>
> Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> ELF header
>
>> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of libgcc_s.so.
Ciao Rigo
> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> > ELF header
> >
Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid ELF
header
> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of libgcc_s.so.1 here. That should be
> > a system library.
Hello All,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> > Hi Don
> >
> >> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
> >> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
> >> should be independent
Hi,
Am 23.08.20 um 01:51 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi -
>
> This is excellent. I’ve been investigating the code.
My Windows Test builds are up (incl. openSSL1.0.2t):
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-418-Test/
>
> The services are called from main/extensions/source/update/check/downl
Hi -
This is excellent. I’ve been investigating the code.
The services are called from main/extensions/source/update/check/download.cxx
using Curl.
To fully confirm the fix the next step is to check into curl dependencies:
https://curl.haxx.se/docs/libs.html
OpenSSL is one of Curl’s TLS provi
Am 23.08.20 um 00:32 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 23 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Finished my Windows builds and AOO 4.1.8 can connect to both, AOO
>> updates and Extension updates.
> Cool. I'll go ahead and merge the pull request.
I will start a new Test build with more languages then
On 23 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Finished my Windows builds and AOO 4.1.8 can connect to both, AOO
> updates and Extension updates.
Cool. I'll go ahead and merge the pull request.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
Hi Don,
Finished my Windows builds and AOO 4.1.8 can connect to both, AOO
updates and Extension updates.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 21.08.20 um 21:57 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Surprising numbers!
Regarding FreeBSD:
Does it make sense to check for updates?
The OS/2 version is being built with --disable-online-update. That
removes the entry in the menu and the options page.
Regards,
Matthias
BTW: We have still about 1,5 million downloads in a month.
Am 21.08.20 um
Well something strange is happening. Infra got me counts from the web logs on
the update check service for the past 30 days.
Here is the report - not everything is stopped.
FreeBSD563
OpenOffice 4.1.6162
OpenOffice 4.1.7401
Linux 1926
OpenOffice 4.0.195
OpenOf
On 21 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>>
>>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>>
>> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
>>
>> But I am not a developer, simple cherry-picking did not w
Hi Don,
Am 21.08.20 um 21:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
>>
>> I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
> Pull request created.
Thanks!
I will do a Windows build and see if the online
On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
>> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
>> should be independent of the CXXFLAGS issue. More of the output of
>> build --from python
>> might be
On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
>
> I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
Pull request created.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
Hi Don
> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
> should be independent of the CXXFLAGS issue. More of the output of
> build --from python
> might be informative.
Did a Dmake clean and th
Hi Don,
Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 21.08.20 um 18:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi Matthias and
On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>
>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>
> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
>
> But I am not a developer, simple cherry-picking did not work for me...
>
> BTW: For 1.0.2t we ne
On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
> I edited by hand (because it was just one line on two files). I still don't
> know how to patch.
>
> Unfortunately it didn't solve the problem (see below)
>
> Maybe this is related to issues in bootstrap? (which do not affect 42X
> building) e.g.
>
>
Hi Don
I edited by hand (because it was just one line on two files). I still don't
know how to patch.
Unfortunately it didn't solve the problem (see below)
Maybe this is related to issues in bootstrap? (which do not affect 42X
building) e.g.
ignoring commons-httpclient-3.1-src.tar.gz because
On 20 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> Try patching solenv/inc/unxlng.mk and solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk to
>> add "-std=gnu++98" to CFLAGSCXX. I recommend doing this for 4.2.0 and
>> trunk as well.
>
> I have no idea how to do that... I'm just an advanced user ;)
> I can compile branc
Hi Dave,
Am 21.08.20 um 00:17 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>
>> On Aug 20, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>>
>>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
> Yes, at least
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>
>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>
> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
Yes, at least ...
>
> But I am not a developer, simple cherry-pickin
Hi Dave,
Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>
> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
Isn't it 1.0.2t?
But I am not a developer, simple cherry-picking did not work for me...
BTW: For 1.0.2t we need NASM for the Windows build. Works for
trunk/AOO42X,
Hi Matthias and Jim,
We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
Plus Pedro would like some help here.
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 2:57 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> Hi Don
>
>> Try patching solenv/inc/unxlng.mk and solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk to
>> add "-std=gnu++98" to CFLAGSCXX. I reco
Hi Don
> Try patching solenv/inc/unxlng.mk and solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk to
> add "-std=gnu++98" to CFLAGSCXX. I recommend doing this for 4.2.0 and
> trunk as well.
I have no idea how to do that... I'm just an advanced user ;)
I can compile branch 4.2.x without problems (haven't tried tr
On 20 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
>> > Can we update openssl in 4.1.8 at least to the version we use in
>> > trunk/AOO42X?
>>
>> Yes, please.
>
> Thank you!
>
>> Have we ever used the system openssl in any of our released builds?
>
> Does Windows have a system openssl? :)
Nope.
> Loo
Hi Dave
> > Can we update openssl in 4.1.8 at least to the version we use in
> > trunk/AOO42X?
>
> Yes, please.
Thank you!
> Have we ever used the system openssl in any of our released builds?
Does Windows have a system openssl? :)
Looking forward to a new Linux x64 4.1.8 build (I can't buil
Hi,
Am 20.08.20 um 21:08 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 20 Aug, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 20.08.20 um 18:35 schrieb Don Lewis:
> Need to look at the history of
>
> (1) openssl
> (2) curl
> (3) and th
On 20 Aug, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 20.08.20 um 18:35 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>
Need to look at the history of
(1) openssl
(2) curl
(3) and the code that uses those.
>>> The version of open
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:38:23 -0700
Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > Am 20.08.20 um 18:35 schrieb Don Lewis:
> >>
> >>> Need to look at the history of
> >>>
> >>> (1) openssl
> >>> (2) curl
> >>> (3) and the code th
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 20.08.20 um 18:35 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>
>>> Need to look at the history of
>>>
>>> (1) openssl
>>> (2) curl
>>> (3) and the code that uses those.
>> The version of openssl used by 4.1.7 is seriously out of date and
56 matches
Mail list logo
