-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/15 22:26, jan i wrote:
> Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
> AOO) ?
> To me it sounds like a downstream adaptation.
If the point is to remove _existing_ functionality, then it is a
downstream adaption
-- replying in-line to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 14:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> +1,
>
> Nice
ownstream adaptation.
rgds
jan i
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Guy Waterval [mailto:waterval@gmail.com ]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 13:00
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
>
> Hi Jan,
> Hi a
resource problem to solve, yet it is nice to see
thoughtful definition taking place.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Guy Waterval [mailto:waterval@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 13:00
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
Hi Jan,
Hi
Hi Jan,
Hi all,
2015-02-16 10:26 GMT+01:00 jan i :
>
> In order to keep it (as AOO) we. need to know
> - is the brand registred and eho has the current right to the brand
> - can we as AOO provide resources to keep this alive
>
> I think it is a good downstream project, but I do not currently see
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 01:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
On Monday, February 16, 2015, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
>
> >
&g
On Monday, February 16, 2015, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
>
> >
> > You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
> > necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
> > Novice, Intermediate and Advanced (AOO without modifica
On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
> You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
> necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
> Novice, Intermediate and Advanced (AOO without modifications) should be
> enough (personal opinion).
>
IMO the brand
Hello,
2015-02-14 23:36 GMT+01:00 jonathon :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [..]
>
> That would require one addition to the ">Tools >Options >Appearance"
> Select UI-Profile, and offer:
> * Prebuilt;
> * Default;
> * Custom;
>
That's exactly what we have discussed by Educ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/02/15 19:47, Guy Waterval wrote:
> more easy to simplify the interface of AOO and adapt it for the school
For both OOoLight and OOo4Kids, if a function was accessible using
keystrokes in OOo, it was accessible in those products. However, if the
Hi Michael,
Hi all,
2015-02-13 9:42 GMT+01:00 RA Stehmann :
> On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best
> guess
> >> is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
> >
>
> I think, that both products are derived
Hi Andrea,
Hi all,
2015-02-13 20:51 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
>
>> Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
>> Apache project?
>>
>
> No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
> projects. Eric's messages
On 13/02/2015 jonathon wrote:
Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
Apache project?
No. But as several people pointed out, they have always been independent
projects. Eric's messages to this list cover pretty much all discussions
we had about them:
http://mark
: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids & OOoLight Status
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
>
>
>> I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
>> is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
>
I think, that both p
>who are the developers of these products and
>how we can contact them.
See Eric Bachard
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:Ericb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 13.02.2015 09:05, jan i wrote:
>
>
>> I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
>> is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
>
I think, that both products are derived works from OpenOffice.org.
Maybe the people, who developed both projects, ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/15 08:05, jan i wrote:
>so my best guess is that they were forgotten,
That would be "forgotten by developers".
The current Trinidad and Tobago DVD contains OOo4Kids.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQ
jan i wrote:
> On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon wrote:
>
> All:
>
> My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
> accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
> the OOo4Kids has been deprec
Пятница, 13 февраля 2015, 7:58 UTC от jonathon :
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>All:
>
>My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
>accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
>https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
On 13 February 2015 at 08:58, jonathon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All:
>
> My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
> accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
>
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All:
My impression was that when Apache Foundation accepted OOo, they also
accepted the OOo4Kids and OOoLight projects.
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/OOo4Kids says that
the OOo4Kids has been depreciated, and points to
http://educ
21 matches
Mail list logo
