Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
On 19 February 2014 17:58, Dave Fisher wrote: > Since Italo claims his comparison is with Microsoft then I wonder what % > complete they require? I'd guess you would need an NDA to find that one out. Maybe. One could ask :-) louis

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread jan i
On 19 February 2014 23:54, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:04 PM, jan i wrote: > > > On 19 February 2014 21:55, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: > >>> On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts >>> wrote: > >>> > hi, > > > >>

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Dave Fisher
On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: >>> On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> hi, On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Tue

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Dave Fisher
On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:04 PM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2014 21:55, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: >>> On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts >> wrote: >>> hi, On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Tue, F

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread jan i
On 19 February 2014 21:55, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: > > On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts >wrote: > > > >> hi, > >> > >> > >> On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir > wrote: > >> > >

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: >> On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> >>> >>> On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: >>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> > >>> >> h

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:31 PM, jan i wrote: > On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> hi, >> >> >> On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread jan i
On 19 February 2014 20:22, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > hi, > > > On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ > >> > >> Don't you love it when they come up wi

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
hi, On 19 February 2014 14:05, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ >> >> Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? >> >> If you look a little bit closer you

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ >> >> Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? >> >> If you look a little bit closer you

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-19 Thread Donald Whytock
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ > > Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? > > If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and > counting languages where the U

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, jan i wrote: > On 18 February 2014 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: > > > http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ > > > > Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? > > > > If you look a little bit closer you see that

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread David Gerard
On 18 February 2014 22:30, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > I don't understand numbers on the table. > For example, Dzongkha. > Where does the number, 171,300, come from? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzongkha says 171,000 native speakers as of 2006, sourced from Ethnologue. - d. ---

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Rob and all, Heavy snow hit Japan. How about your places? http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ I don't understand numbers on the table. For example, Dzongkha. Where does the number, 171,300, come from? Thanks, khirano On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Rob

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Thanks a lot for your investigations. It shows that both projects have a different view point of what an apple is and looks like. Marcus Am 02/18/2014 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 02/18/2014 07:39 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Rob Weir wrote: Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? The standard "Help Translate Apache OpenOffice" page https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well the situati

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
On 2014-02-18, at 13:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? > > The standard "Help Translate Apache OpenOffice" page > https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html > is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rob Weir wrote: Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? The standard "Help Translate Apache OpenOffice" page https://openoffice.apache.org/translate.html is probably too fair to be sexy, but it explains well the situation in OpenOffice: --- A list of complete, rele

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread jan i
On 18 February 2014 18:34, Rob Weir wrote: > http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ > > Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? > > If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and > counting languages where the UI is on

Re: More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Of course, we shouldn't judge their release criteria. That is their > business (and their users) not ours. But when they make false > comparisons in a table, comparing apples-to-oranges, then we ought to > note it. LIARS, that's the word. FC

More annoying FUD

2014-02-18 Thread Rob Weir
http://www.italovignoli.org/2014/02/language-support-of-office-suites/ Don't you love it when they come up with these false comparisons? If you look a little bit closer you see that they are releasing and counting languages where the UI is only 15% translated. So yes, if you are willing to relea