Kay Schenk wrote:
Two questions --
Are we ready to go ahead with these changes to /main/external_deps.lst --
No we aren't! Roberto sent us a proof of concept, but he wrote that even
the URL will change, so it is definitely not OK to change the location
for Extras from Google Code to SourceFor
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 29/10/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>
>> Here we go, the new look&feel based on some of your earlier feedback:
>> http://sourceforge.net/directory/apache_extras
>>
>
> This is much improved, thanks Roberto! The landing page is now much
On 29/10/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Here we go, the new look&feel based on some of your earlier feedback:
http://sourceforge.net/directory/apache_extras
This is much improved, thanks Roberto! The landing page is now much cleaner.
Some of the comments on the inner pages still apply, but mayb
2014-10-27 13:57 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini :
>
>
> 2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
>
>> On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
>>> the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below.
>>> Comme
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I think the observation about long file names has to do with
these, e.g.,
d6eef4b4cacb2183f2bf265a5a03a354-boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2
which make the page unreadable because the CSS forces the Name
column to be too narrow to see the full names.
Indeed
below
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 05:57
To: dev
Cc: d...@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Extras PoC
2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
[ ... ]
> Honestly, with the very long filena
2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
>> the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below.
>> Comments/Input welcome.
>> https://sourceforge.net/directory/vert
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Is the intention to not make these particularly visible and have
the SF locations just provide a kind of private parking lot for the
AOO project?
The way we have used Apache Extras so far, indeed, is as a mere file
repository (which is exactly the usage
s inline
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 23:21
To: d...@community.apache.org
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Extras PoC
On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
> Roberto and others from Sourceforge h
On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below.
Comments/Input welcome.
https://sourceforge.net/directory/vertical:Apache-Extras/
This was sent to the dev@community li
10 matches
Mail list logo
