Am 29.07.19 um 00:17 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 28.07.19 um 23:12 schrieb Marcus:
Am 28.07.19 um 20:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 28.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Marcus:
Am 27.07.19 um 13:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter
On 29.07.19 17:18, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 29.07.19 um 00:39 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> A different suggestion we use the git commit count. The command is:
>>
>> |git rev-list --all --count It will deliver something that looks similar
>> to the svn number we already use. All the B
Hi Peter,
Am 29.07.19 um 00:39 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> A different suggestion we use the git commit count. The command is:
>
> |git rev-list --all --count It will deliver something that looks similar
> to the svn number we already use. All the Best Peter |
How would such a simple count point to a
A different suggestion we use the git commit count. The command is:
|git rev-list --all --count It will deliver something that looks similar
to the svn number we already use. All the Best Peter |
On 29.07.19 00:17, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Am 28.07.19 um 23:12 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am
Hi Marcus,
Am 28.07.19 um 23:12 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 28.07.19 um 20:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 28.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 27.07.19 um 13:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> Hi Matth
Am 28.07.19 um 20:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 28.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Marcus:
Am 27.07.19 um 13:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Hi Matthias,
back to the initial discussion.
Obviously you didn't read
Am 28.07.19 um 21:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Cms will be shut down soon. The question is how we deal with this.
Info is in the chat protocol in my original post.
OK, then we will have a big problem in order to serve our website pages.
Marcus
We migrate only code not the cms or other resources.
I have so far not managed to look at the hash topic.
Cms will be shut down soon. The question is how we deal with this.
Info is in the chat protocol in my original post.
Am 28. Juli 2019 20:29:09 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
>Hi Marcus,
>
Hi Marcus,
Am 28.07.19 um 20:12 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 27.07.19 um 13:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
back to the initial discussion.
>>> Obviously you didn't read my mail until the en
Am 27.07.19 um 13:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Hi Matthias,
back to the initial discussion.
Obviously you didn't read my mail until the end...
I have created the request. Simply requesting that trunc, b
Hi all,
Am 23.07.19 um 11:08 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> back to the initial discussion.
> Obviously you didn't read my mail until the end...
>> I have created the request. Simply requesting that trunc, branch and
>> tags are moved. All ot
Hi Peter,
Am 21.07.19 um 12:27 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> back to the initial discussion.
Obviously you didn't read my mail until the end...
>
> I have created the request. Simply requesting that trunc, branch and
> tags are moved. All other folders should remain as is.
>
> I hope this suits everyone
Hi Peter,
Am 21.07.19 um 12:02 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> On 21.07.19 11:42, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> 4) As a user I want o be aware how the SVN right management is set. We
>>> had issues with this. This was not the decision in favour for git but
>>> for cWiki. And I add this now, since I do a use
back to the initial discussion.
I have created the request. Simply requesting that trunc, branch and
tags are moved. All other folders should remain as is.
I hope this suits everyone.
Please review:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18773
On 21.07.19 01:42, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi
On 21.07.19 11:42, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> 4) As a user I want o be aware how the SVN right management is set. We
>> had issues with this. This was not the decision in favour for git but
>> for cWiki. And I add this now, since I do a use case recap :P
> In fact, it was you having issues with
Hi Peter,
Am 21.07.19 um 11:19 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Hello Branko,
>
> On 21.07.19 07:24, Mechtilde wrote:
>> Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko Čibej:
>>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote:
>>>
Hi brane,
The threads are linked in my first post.
>>> Thanks ...
Hello Branko,
On 21.07.19 07:24, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko Čibej:
>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote:
>>
>>> Hi brane,
>>>
>>> The threads are linked in my first post.
>>>
>> Thanks ... Sorry I missed those.
you are welcome. No issue.
>>
>>
>>> It is
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 07:25 Mechtilde, wrote:
> Hello Branko,
>
> Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko Čibej:
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote:
> >
> >> Hi brane,
> >>
> >> The threads are linked in my first post.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks ... Sorry I missed those.
> >
> >
> >> It is f
Hello Branko,
Am 21.07.19 um 02:01 schrieb Branko Čibej:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote:
>
>> Hi brane,
>>
>> The threads are linked in my first post.
>>
>
> Thanks ... Sorry I missed those.
>
>
>> It is for me a workflow thing.
>> I need a decentral versioning system instea
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, wrote:
> Hi brane,
>
> The threads are linked in my first post.
>
Thanks ... Sorry I missed those.
> It is for me a workflow thing.
> I need a decentral versioning system instead of a central one.
>
Which particular "decentralised" feature do you miss
Hi brane,
The threads are linked in my first post.
It is for me a workflow thing.
I need a decentral versioning system instead of a central one.
And I want github as public patch interface.
Both do not work with svn.
I add a reason that I heard at work. Young people do not know svn. They expec
Hi AOO devs,
I just stumbled onto this thread. Coming from subversion.a.o, I'm saddened
to see you've decided to switch to Git. Could someone please summarise the
reasons for this decision, or give me a link to the discussion in the mail
archives? I'd very much like to know if it was caused by som
On 20.07.19 16:35, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> thanks for your work
>
> Am 20.07.19 um 16:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> That's a great idea, thank you!
>>
>> 1.1 - 1.5: test/ requires main/ to build, for Ant scripts. main/ requires
>> ext_libraries/ if not more.
>> Why can't we use one
Hello Peter,
thanks for your work
Am 20.07.19 um 16:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> That's a great idea, thank you!
>
> 1.1 - 1.5: test/ requires main/ to build, for Ant scripts. main/ requires
> ext_libraries/ if not more.
> Why can't we use one repository for everything, like the Github mirror
That's a great idea, thank you!
1.1 - 1.5: test/ requires main/ to build, for Ant scripts. main/ requires
ext_libraries/ if not more.
Why can't we use one repository for everything, like the Github mirror
already does?
Regards
Damjan
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 2:16 PM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hello
Hello all,
I had a talk with Gavin today, informing myself about the migration from
SVN to Git. Since we have already a github mirror process we can not use
the self service.
I copied the chat to Cwiki, in order everyone can review what have been
spoken about. [0]
Summary:
We have to open a ti
26 matches
Mail list logo
