On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, 01:42 Peter Kovacs, <pe...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi brane, > > The threads are linked in my first post. >
Thanks ... Sorry I missed those. > It is for me a workflow thing. > I need a decentral versioning system instead of a central one. > Which particular "decentralised" feature do you miss most? For example, there's work going on to implement client-side shelving (similar to 'git stash'), it's experimental but available in various forms in the last 3 Subversion (minor) releases And I want github as public patch interface. > Both do not work with svn. > > I add a reason that I heard at work. Young people do not know svn. They > expect to work with git. > IMHO it is a dumb argument but in my country the fresh people from > university are dictating a little their working environment. > > Ahh and git has major pains reading OpenOffice svn repo. So I can't even > use git as a client. > I assume you mean git-svn? I'm not surprised. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Looks like nothing short of making svn just another git would make you change your mind. :) -- Brane > > All the best. > Peter > > Am 21. Juli 2019 01:17:32 MESZ schrieb "Branko Čibej" <br...@apache.org>: > >Hi AOO devs, > > > >I just stumbled onto this thread. Coming from subversion.a.o, I'm > >saddened > >to see you've decided to switch to Git. Could someone please summarise > >the > >reasons for this decision, or give me a link to the discussion in the > >mail > >archives? I'd very much like to know if it was caused by some specific > >problem or missing feature in Subversion that we may be able to > >address. > > > >-- Brane >
