Hi,
Peter has done his testing and posted a revised note.
I don't expect more votes to come in...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 20.02.23 um 12:25 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> FWIW, I'm fine keeping the vote open a few days longer.
>
>> On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 20.02.
FWIW, I'm fine keeping the vote open a few days longer.
> On Feb 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Peter,
>>
Am 20.02.23 um 00:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Peter,
Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Peter,
This should not be in [VOTE] but in [DISCUSS], we should keep the
thread "clean".
I voted no because i was unsure if the wild shot is
Hi Peter,
Am 19.02.23 um 23:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> This should not be in [VOTE] but in [DISCUSS], we should keep the
>> thread "clean".
>>
> I voted no because i was unsure if the wild shot is correct
Sorry, your vote was in
Am 19.02.23 um 23:44 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Peter,
This should not be in [VOTE] but in [DISCUSS], we should keep the
thread "clean".
I voted no because i was unsure if the wild shot is correct
I installed the X64 version of Adoptium JAVA 11 on our M1 machine and
could open the file
Hi Peter,
This should not be in [VOTE] but in [DISCUSS], we should keep the thread
"clean".
I installed the X64 version of Adoptium JAVA 11 on our M1 machine and
could open the file without problem.
So this would be something for the Release Notes, macOS section?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 19.02