On 15 November 2013 20:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>> * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ...
>> We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro
>> which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving
>> us our own environment
On 15 November 2013 18:59, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 15.11.2013 08:38, janI wrote:
> >
> >> On 15 November 2013 08:25, O
On 15 November 2013 08:25, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.11.2013 00:54, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, janI wrote:
>>
>> On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 2
On 14 November 2013 03:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti >wrote:
>
> > On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> >> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
> >> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
> >> Buildbots are still at 6, alth
On 13 November 2013 20:28, Rob Weir wrote:
> This will be something to post after Steve merges the code intro the
> trunk, which I understand will be soon:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_4_1_to
>
> Does anyone have anything else to add? A quote from an a
On 13 November 2013 09:07, Graham Lauder wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>
> > 2013/11/13 Graham Lauder
> >
> > > I'm having issues editing the Media wiki, I keep getting a 502 error.
> > >
> > > Everything works up 'til the "submit" process.
> > >
> > > Error as f
gt;> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Herbert Duerr wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
>&
On 12 November 2013 20:12, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> > Herbert Duerr wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
> >>>
> >>> @herbert, if nobody objects will you reopen the ticket,
On 12 November 2013 17:32, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/12/13 5:24 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> >>> On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
> >>>> based on
On 12 November 2013 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/12/13 5:06 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> > On 12.11.2013 16:48, janI wrote:
> >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts
> >> comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra g
On 12 November 2013 16:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts
> > comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
> >
>
On 12 November 2013 17:02, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
> > On 11/12/13 4:48 PM, janI wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts
> >> com
Hi.
based on the discussion in thread "XML files are binary" and herberts
comments I had a chat with jfarrell (the infra git specialist).
We can have a GIT Read/Only mirror very easy (standard)
We cannot have a GIT Read/write mirror (restriction from infra)
We can switch completely to GIT (whic
On 12 November 2013 15:54, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 12.11.2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>> I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work
>> is not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary.
>> Checking their properties revealed that their mime
On 12 November 2013 14:59, Andre Fischer wrote:
> I just checked in some files for creating Windows patches (no, the work is
> not yet finished) and saw that the .xml files are flagged as binary.
> Checking their properties revealed that their mime type is correctly set
> to application/xml. Do
On 9 November 2013 22:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 08/11/2013 Steve Yin wrote:
>
>> The main development work for IA2 feature is finished on the branch ia2.
>> Although there are some bugs in the current revision, I propose to merge
>> the branch to the trunk for involving more volunteers.
>>
On 9 November 2013 00:47, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
> Some people get certificate errors on the forums
>
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=65462
>
> I can see this too every now and then, but not on the browser: reading the
> ES forum rss feeds Akregator sometimes shows,
On 8 November 2013 14:09, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 08.11.2013 13:39, Armin Le Grand wrote:
>
>> On 08.11.2013 13:18, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> If you are working on Windows then you'll notice that the
>>> --with-mozilla-build option is still there as NSS being part of the
>>> Moz
On 6 November 2013 17:35, Daiwe wrote:
> Try replacing $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']
> in session_begin in session.php
> with $_SERVER['HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR']
>
Thx a lot for your proposal, which I can see is correct (this is exactly
what I did for wiki, when I was admin). I am not appl admin an
On Nov 6, 2013 3:46 PM, "FR web forum" wrote:
>
> >proxy is configured transarent, the admins jut need to change the php2bb
> >config, to make use of the header info.
> Thanks jan
> We are on PhpBB 3
> I don't find this parameter in ACP.
> Could you be more explicit?
not more than I expect you ha
Hi.
Just an update on the capstone 2013 project.
The students have on plan delivered a requirement spec (see edited version
below). Steven H (Xalan) and I have spent quite a lot of time, getting the
students on the right track.
Next step, is a technology research, and then we start converting, I
Hi.
I just read this warning from microsoft (after a hint on infra):
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/531046/microsoft_warns_office_zero-day_active_hacker_exploits/?utm_medium=rss&utm_source=sectionfeed
aoo imports office 2007 documents, so could it be a problem for us too ?
rgds
jan I.
On Nov 5, 2013 9:38 PM, "FR web forum" wrote:
>
>
> >But still, we need the real IP. It's useful in case of spam.
> +1
> Sometime, we have a spambot with multiple accounts.
> Disable by IP is the only one thing to stop it.
>
> The solution is to configure server as transparent proxy.
proxy is con
On 4 November 2013 21:22, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 04/11/2013 10:53, Ricardo Berlasso a écrit :
>
> (top posting) The problem was indeed the maximum number of connections
>> allowed from the same ip: it was setted well bellow the usual number of
>> users on EN forums. It's working now. let's see
On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote:
>
> On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote:
> > On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
&g
On Nov 4, 2013 4:10 PM, "FR web forum" wrote:
>
> >All http://forum.openoffice.org request are permanently redirected to
> >https://forum.openoffice.org
>
> PhpBB store the ip address for each post
> We have a problem with https
> All posts are the same ip 140.211.11.74 (erebus-ssl.apache.org)
y
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, "Andre Fischer" wrote:
>
> On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
>> comments.
>>
>> But my original question is still not answered, do w
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
rgds
jan I.
On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote:
> > > The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan
> > > output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1
> > > a rele
Hi
I am happy to announce that https://forum.openoffice.org is now open.
All http://forum.openoffice.org request are permanently redirected to
https://forum.openoffice.org
The site has been briefly tested, and the http/https mix problem exist on
forum, just like on wiki.
Thanks to all that help
On 2 November 2013 23:03, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
Hi.
As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target "ratscan".
Do we actively use this target or is it a leftover from the move to ASF ?
rgds
jan I.
On 2 November 2013 17:17, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Jan,
>
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 8:58 AM, janI wrote:
>
> > Sorry it seems that markmail does not provide inline responses.
> >
> > I will not prescribe the admins how to change the setup, I tested on my
> db
> &g
Sorry it seems that markmail does not provide inline responses.
I will not prescribe the admins how to change the setup, I tested on my db
copy, with a couple of "update where ..." statements, basically replacing
http:// with /.
rgds
jan I.
Hmm it seems markmail does not allow me to reply inline, sorry for that.
extensions.o.o and templates.o.o are as far as I know not hosted on ASF
infrastructure, and therefore I (and infra) cannot provide https: access
Please talk with the host providers of extensions and templates, if they
are pr
Sorry I am a bit confused.
I have been looking for a Function spec. for 4.1 but not found one, did I
miss something ?
Also I have not found a decision (but many mails assuming) that our next
release will be 4.1 and not e.g. 4.0.2 (f.x. added languages).
Trunk is ready to build, but is that real
Hi
I am pleased to announce that now wiki.openoffice.org runs in a secure
https:// environment.
http://wiki.openoffice.org and http://wiki.services.openoffice.org are both
redirected (permanent) to https://wiki.openoffice.org
The downtime was less than 10sec.
We have not made changes on the vm
Hi
Just a polite info, about the infra work starting friday 1 november 16:00.
--- wiki.a.o ---
will be changed to https:// only.
http:// will be redirected automatically to https://
Test shows that everything works, but users get warnings about mixed
https:// http:// pages. The mixing is due to
Hi.
Just a polite information.
--- wiki.o.o ---
will be changed to https:// only after friday 1 november 16:00.
http:// will automatically redirect to https://
Test shows that everything will work, but users get warnings due to mixed
https:// http:// pages. As described earlier this is somethin
; On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
> >> >> Hi.
> >> >>
> >> >> www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced
> >> >> earlier.
> >> >>
> >> >> We have however seen that e.g. pr
On 27 October 2013 13:34, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:05 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05
k later
http://forum.openoffice.org will be changed to a redirect to
https://forum.openoffice.org and thereby all traffic will be https:
I have already now seen references to http:// this need to be changed,
otherwise users will get a warning.
rgds
jan I.
> On 2013/10/27 16:05, janI said:
> > On
On 27 October 2013 02:58, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:30:06PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
> > >> Hi.
On 26 October 2013 23:45, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:26:21PM +0200, janI wrote:
> > > There are 26,349 matches of "http://www.openoffice.org/"; in
> > > ooo-site.
> > >
> >
> > I am glad you did not count "h
On 26 October 2013 23:05, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:54:59PM +0200, janI wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced
> earlier.
> >
> > We have however seen that e.g. product.css
Hi.
www.openoffice.org now accept both http: and https: as announced earlier.
We have however seen that e.g. product.css contain image tag with http://xxx.
All references must be relative (without http: and https:). I hope the web
admins can do make the needed changes.
https://wiki.openoffice.or
On 26 October 2013 19:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, janI wrote:
>
> > I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got very
> > tired.
> >
> > I think your idea of making it easy for translators and also documenters
&
On 26 October 2013 15:29, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Just information for those that do not follow infra discussions.
>
> Infra is preparing to activate our openoffice certificate. I will be be
> doing the work under the guidance of mark who knows what needs to be done.
>
>
my parser broke.
rgds
jan I.
On 25 October 2013 21:42, janI wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25 October 2013 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, janI wrote:
>>
>> > On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >
>> > &g
Hi.
Just information for those that do not follow infra discussions.
Infra is preparing to activate our openoffice certificate. I will be be
doing the work under the guidance of mark who knows what needs to be done.
It will be activated for all .o.o services, service by service.
A couple of the
On 25 October 2013 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, janI wrote:
>
> > On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> > > [top posting]
> > >
> > > never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't d
On 25 October 2013 11:15, Vladislav Stevanovic <
stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/10/25 Jürgen Schmidt
>
> >
> > we can simply define a rule that unmaintained extension will be removed
> > when the owner doesn't reply on mail requests.
> >
> > That means we can send a mail to the owne
On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote:
> [top posting]
>
> never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a last step.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
>
the makefiles in helpcontent2, are like good italian spaghetti, especially
the util directories, where parts of what was done in
On 25 October 2013 01:59, Vladislav Stevanovic <
stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>2) In future we must made restriction for those extensions on our site
> >
>
> >I don't get what you would restrict. Do you mean that you would "hide" all
> extensions that are >not compatible with 4.0
22 October 2013 20:53, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
>
> On 22 October 2013 16:09, janI wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> The database(s) behind forum.o.o need to be changed and moved to a new
>> fast central sql server.
>>
>> In order to test the changes w
On 23 October 2013 13:57, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
>> nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
>> potentially insecure.
>>
>
> Absolutely. For the same reason the internal NSS should be up
Hi.
On 22 October 2013 16:09, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The database(s) behind forum.o.o need to be changed and moved to a new
> fast central sql server.
>
> In order to test the changes without disturbing anyone, I have created a
> forum "test" where all needed
On 22 October 2013 16:41, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22.10.2013 10:04, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's really daunting that nobody cares!
>>
>>
> I care, but only as a user of our Bugzilla instance being frustrated when
> I need Bugzilla in the morning (European time zo
On 22 October 2013 16:15, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 14:22, Herbert Dürr wrote:
>
>> On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> Since issue 91209 the mozilla addr
Hi.
The database(s) behind forum.o.o need to be changed and moved to a new fast
central sql server.
In order to test the changes without disturbing anyone, I have created a
forum "test" where all needed changes will be done during the coming days.
Thursday 22/10 at 1500 UTC, we will begin moving
On 22 October 2013 13:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 13:32, janI wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>>
>&
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
> wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient) version
> of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with its security
> features enabled such a
On 22 October 2013 13:31, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 13:08, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:20 AM, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>
>>>&
On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
>>>
On 22 October 2013 12:47, imacat wrote:
> On 2013/10/22 16:10, imacat said:
> > On 2013/10/22 15:42, janI said:
> >> On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
> >>> On 2013/10/22 02:37, janI said:
> >>>> On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
> all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of
> roughly 150MB. The size of the actual changes is typically much smaller.
>
Hi Phan.
We (infra) are going the move the forum database to a central server, in
order to that we need some preparation work done.
Currently the VI forum is the one with the lowest load (ref. imacat), so we
would like to test the changes on the VI forum, before changing all forums.
The changes
On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
> 於 2013年10月22日 02:37, janI 提到:
> > On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> >
> >> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200:
> >>> Tony Stevenson wrote:
> >>>> Andrea Pesc
On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200:
> > Tony Stevenson wrote:
> > >Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200:
> > >>Please tell us when the migration is complete so that we can remove
> > >>the warn
On 21 October 2013 17:22, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200:
> > Tony Stevenson wrote:
> > >We expect to start the downtime at 15:00 UTC. Apologies for the short
> > >notice
> >
> > It is indeed a very, very short notice! Thanks at least for s
On 21 October 2013 15:52, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 21.10.2013 12:35, janI wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I have the following plan:
>> a) rename all Makefile to Makefile.gb, and correct prj/makefile.mk to the
>> new name
>>
>
> prj/makefile.mk usuall
On 21 October 2013 12:59, Siva wrote:
> Which means we can only
> contribute to " Projects " but
> not " Foundation Projects"
> Is that so ? ( I am not able
> to understand what is
> "internal" for apache )
>
"internal" are projects, that do not deliver a product in form of releases
available to
On 21 October 2013 10:58, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 20.10.2013 12:40, janI wrote:
>
>> On 19 October 2013 19:20, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Andre Fischer
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote:
On 21 October 2013 10:50, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 18.10.2013 19:54, janI wrote:
>
>> On 18 October 2013 16:52, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>>
&
On 20 October 2013 20:59, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:03 PM, janI wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages:
> >
> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights
> >
> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Aut
On 20 October 2013 19:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, janI wrote:
>
> > On 20 October 2013 19:36, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > > Probably out of date, why not commiting the change?
> > >
> >
> > Committi
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:03 PM, janI wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages:
> >
> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights
> >
> > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration
> >
> >
Hi
due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration
First page refers to oracle, and second page does not even mention the
apache license.
Is that really how we want it ?
I am not a leg
On 19 October 2013 19:20, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
> > On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote:
> >
> >> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote:
> >&
On 19 October 2013 20:28, akshika akalanka wrote:
> Good idea :-)
> On Oct 19, 2013 10:53 PM, "Vladislav Stevanovic" <
> stevanovicvladis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does exist some list of easy tasks that some potential developer for AOO
> > can see? Idea is that this sort of list
On 18 October 2013 16:52, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 18.10.2013 15:58, janI wrote:
>
>> On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> sd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18 October
On 18 October 2013 15:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 18.10.2013 14:02, janI wrote:
>
>> sd
>>
>>
>> On 18 October 2013 13:36, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 18.10.2013 11:32, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>
sd
On 18 October 2013 13:36, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 18.10.2013 11:32, janI wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> due to the discussion in thread "Mentor a new build system", I have made a
>> proposal for a central Makefile located in main.
>>
> Hi Jan,
&
Hi.
due to the discussion in thread "Mentor a new build system", I have made a
proposal for a central Makefile located in main.
It has been roughly tested it, thanks to a clever utility from andre.
As discussed build.pl contains a lot of options, which need to be
considered in a makefile.
My su
On 16 October 2013 10:11, janI wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 October 2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2013 janI wrote:
>>
>>> I think I have corrected the flex issue, with r1531149, thanks to the
>>> flex generated file I got from juergen.
On 16 October 2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 janI wrote:
>
>> I think I have corrected the flex issue, with r1531149, thanks to the
>> flex generated file I got from juergen.
>> @andrea, @jsc, when you have time please give it a shoot.
>> pl
On 15 October 2013 10:02, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 14.10.2013 23:40, janI wrote:
>
>> On 14 October 2013 23:34, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
On Oct 15, 2013 8:01 AM, "imacat" wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> As Drew requested to resign from the administrators in all forums,
> and TerryE's account will be removed from administrators, too, I'm
> planning to check the privileged accounts on all the 10 forums, and
> remove inactive administrat
On 14 October 2013 23:34, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM, janI wrote:
>
> > On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Andre Fischer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On 14 October 2013 19:44, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
> > On 11.10.2013 18:10, janI wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU
> >> capston
On 14 October 2013 11:55, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 14.10.2013 10:12, janI wrote:
>
>> On 14 October 2013 10:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 14.10.2013 09:38, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for top posting.
>>>>
>>>> There seems
On 14 October 2013 10:00, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 14.10.2013 09:38, janI wrote:
>
>> Sorry for top posting.
>>
>> There seems to be some confusion, about the project.
>>
>> The goal is not to replace the current system (this is only a potential
>&
On 14 October 2013 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 11.10.2013 18:10, janI wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU
>> capstone.
>>
>> The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working t
Sorry for top posting.
There seems to be some confusion, about the project.
The goal is not to replace the current system (this is only a potential
long time goal). The goal is to make a parallel build system suited for
windows developers, and then in a second phase generate makefiles for linux.
On 12 October 2013 23:33, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2013, at 9:23 AM, janI wrote:
>
> > On 12 October 2013 17:55, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, janI wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> FYI: as I inf
On 11 October 2013 10:20, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/11/13 9:46 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 11 October 2013 09:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hi Jan,
> >>
> >> I will change my config setting to continue but you should take a look
> >> on --genPO swti
On 12 October 2013 17:55, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, janI wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU
> capstone.
> >
> > The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working
Hi.
FYI: as I informed a while ago, I made a project proposal for OSU capstone.
The project has been selected, so we will have 4 students working the next
months to achieve the following:
http://eecs.oregonstate.edu/capstone/viewproposal2013.php?id=16
extract from above:
motivation:
"Apache Op
--with-lang="da en-US es" \
--with-package-format="rpm deb" \
--with-vendor="jani local build"
rgds
jan I.
>
> Juergen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
n i.
On 10 October 2013 16:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/10/13 3:56 PM, janI wrote:
>> On 10 October 2013 15:51, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> after solving some further dependency problems ... I get now this error
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/g++-4.0 -fsigned-char -
1 - 100 of 912 matches
Mail list logo