On 23 October 2013 13:57, Herbert Duerr <h...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external >> nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and >> potentially insecure. >> > > Absolutely. For the same reason the internal NSS should be updated. Would > you be interested in doing it? You did a great job of updating some other > AOO-external libs. >
When / if we do this update, should we not do like other packages do, have the lib as a preinstallation requirement, and not something we download ? I have had pretty the same thought for all external libs (ext_libraries) and to a part also (ext_sources). But maybe I am completely wrong. rgds jan I. > > While on the subject of replacing mozilla addressbook, just thought I'd >> remind about the analysis done by Andre while we were working on IP >> clearance [1]. >> >> Back then I also found the Mulberry vCard library [2] that is under an >> Apache License. Interfacing it with AOO is a completely different >> matter though :-(. >> > > Thanks for the link to mulberry. But as can seen in the scripts [2][3] > linked to in my original mail, accessing the interesting address sources is > by far the least problem. Delivering this info properly into AOO is much > more work. > > [2] https://bug241438.bugzilla.**mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=** > 175024&action=view<https://bug241438.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175024&action=view> > [3] http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/11538550/retrieving-** > outlook-contacts-via-python<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11538550/retrieving-outlook-contacts-via-python> > > Herbert > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
