Am 01.09.2016 um 00:59 schrieb Simon Phipps:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and F
Again, I have only looked at a few of these.
http://bit.ly/2bCshfO
It would be valuable for QA folks to retest with 4.1.2.
The Mac one with Base is a very big deal and, until we have a dedicated
Mac builder, person or buildbot, it unlikely it will be resolved.
--
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 14:20
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)
>
> On 8/31/2016 10:25 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO
>
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > One can always create an indep
On 08/31/2016 09:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now,
> the odds are clearly that it will not. I suspect that folks who would pursue
> that avenue do not see a meaningful opportunity.
>
> My considered opinion is that th
On 8/31/2016 10:25 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan
[mailto:p...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:57 To:
dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was
RE: null)
[ ... ] [orcmid]
I would like to suggest a way of s
Hi Patricia;
I, for one, appreciate the idea: 80% of the users are Windows people and
the project should be focusing on improving the experience on that platform.
OTOH, most of the active developers work on UNIX variant (and I suspect
FreeBSD is the majority lately). I conceptually understand
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:38 PM, toki wrote:
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides
> what you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
>
> There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or E
On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides what
> you want, why are you not satisfied with that?
There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or EO.
There are functions and capabilities in EO that are
On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now,
> the odds are clearly that it will not.
The Document Foundation is an independent entity, building upon the OOo
3.x code base.
> My considered opinion is that the great
On 8/31/2016 10:25 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:57
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)
[ ... ]
[orcmid]
I would like to suggest a way of
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:57
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)
>
[ ... ]
[orcmid]
> I would like to suggest a way of squeezing out from between the rock and
One can always create an independent entity. It hasn't happened. By now, the
odds are clearly that it will not. I suspect that folks who would pursue that
avenue do not see a meaningful opportunity.
My considered opinion is that the greatest barrier is lack of a meaningful
business/operation
> -Original Message-
> From: Απόστολος Συρόπουλος [mailto:asyropoulos...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: ΑΠ: Merge with LibreOffice?
>
>
> >> Greetings, dear AOO community.
> >>
> >> Please note first that this message is no
[BCC to AOO dev list]
Please remove dev@openoffice.apache.org from these messages. The discussion
seems to have little to do with Apache OpenOffice and there appears to be
nothing that the project can contribute with respect to this issue.
If that is not the case, please open a bugzilla issu
16 matches
Mail list logo