On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:38 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > The question I am left with is this: If a cousin development provides > what you want, why are you not satisfied with that? > > There are functions and capabilities in AOo that are not in LibO or EO. > There are functions and capabilities in EO that are not in LibO or AOo. > There are functions and capabilities in LibO that are not in AOo or EO. > > As such, until one of those contains all of the functions and > capabilities found in the other two, there will always be users whose > use case will require at least two, if not all three be installed. > I can't speak for what power users there may be out there, but I suspect I personally am much more likely to pick one and then defend my decision to the death, even if it means adjusting my usage pattern to fit. My criteria may be financial, or functional, or even socio-political, but whichever it is, it's enough of an effort to change my word processor AND my mind that it's not likely to happen on a casual basis, much less a day-to-day one. Don
