Hello, Ariel.
Thank you for quick reply and detailed build switch.
I'll try!
Thank you.
Regards,
Shoichiro Yanagida
2015-03-16 10:47 GMT+09:00 Ariel Constenla-Haile :
> Hello Shoichiro,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:53:33AM +0900, Shoichiro Yanagida wrote:
> > Hi, I'm planning on integrating so
Hello Shoichiro,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:53:33AM +0900, Shoichiro Yanagida wrote:
> Hi, I'm planning on integrating some functionality of reportbuilder.
> Prior to this, I have to read and understand current source code.
> Is source code of report builder in svn the latest version
> which works
Hi, I'm planning on integrating some functionality of reportbuilder.
Prior to this, I have to read and understand current source code.
Is source code of report builder in svn the latest version
which works with AOO 4.1.1 ?
I've found two versions of oxt binary.
One is in the official extension
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 03/15/2015 12:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Are you confusing two different repositories? We have:
1) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/ext_sources/
This is for dependencies that are under a compatible license
2) OOO Extras in its current form at Google Code or S
On 03/15/2015 12:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/03/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> There seems to be renewed interest in the SourceForge solution for
>> Apache Extras from an older discussion on d...@community.apache.org.
>
> Yes, since we are now sure that Google Code is shutting down in early
On 15/03/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
There seems to be renewed interest in the SourceForge solution for
Apache Extras from an older discussion on d...@community.apache.org.
Yes, since we are now sure that Google Code is shutting down in early
2016. So migration is no longer something that can happe
On 03/03/2015 03:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of
> external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this
> might take? Latest discussion --
>
> http://markmail.org/message/xfiafpfvhvbe4tiv
>
> We've updated at least 2 li
Hi Carl,
I have tried (yesterday) the 4.1.0 version of the plugin (update from 4.0.6) to
rebuild an extension I wrote last summer in Java. It has worked fine and I
haven't encountered any problems or unexpected behavior.
Platform:
* Netbeans 8.0.2 Patch 1
* Windows 8.1 64-bit edition
* Java 1.8.
On 15/03/15 02:57, Andrew Pitonyak wrote:
> Take a look at what wikipedia has to say. It looks like in the EU email
> disclaimers are useless. No idea how accurate that is.
Wikipedia: The home of that which people would like to be true, even in
the face of objective reality which proves it to be
