On 03/03/2015 03:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of > external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this > might take? Latest discussion -- > > http://markmail.org/message/xfiafpfvhvbe4tiv > > We've updated at least 2 libraries already and more will likely be needed. > > In the absence of a decision on this, should we just use URL1 for these > and not include a URL2 at all? > > As I mentioned previously, I'm still been computing MD5 on the new ones > and putting them in /ext_sources. >
There seems to be renewed interest in the SourceForge solution for Apache Extras from an older discussion on d...@community.apache.org. >From this response in that thread -- http://markmail.org/message/3opx3vohevs7bdzx it seems AOO has decided on the SF solution, yes? If so, what do we need to do to get actual syncing to happen with /trunk/ext_sources? Some external sources have been updated within the last 2 months, and this does not seem to be reflected in the listing at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK “What is the point of being alive if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?” -- John Green, "An Abundance of Katherines" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
