On 15/03/15 02:57, Andrew Pitonyak wrote: > Take a look at what wikipedia has to say. It looks like in the EU email > disclaimers are useless. No idea how accurate that is.
Wikipedia: The home of that which people would like to be true, even in the face of objective reality which proves it to be otherwise. What he hasn't figured out yet, is that he needs to explicitly invoke the "right to be forgotten", in each individual request to each and every archive in Europe, as well as to every organization that has a presence in Europe, and also maintains a _public_ archive. If he wishes to explore the law in regards to private archives, he can do so, but it will cost him a very pretty penny, for very little, if any reward. At least, I think that it is _the right to be forgotten_ that he is trying to invoke here. There is a tie-in between those disclaimers, and the right to be forgotten, but reliance on the former to achieve the latter is a very risky business. BTW, he still doesn't appear to be using "X-No-Archive" or "X-Archive" headers. Either of which would reinforce his claim to the right to be forgotten. Furthermore some archives still honour them. jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
