New reporting tool for PMC, and a mail list overview.

2015-03-08 Thread jan i
On Monday, March 9, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts > wrote: > > > On 08-03-2015, at 15:14, jan i wrote: > > > > For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists. > > > Jan, what mail lists would you recommend interested members follow? Members would normally know which lists to follow

Re: New reporting tool for PMC, and a mail list overview.

2015-03-08 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 08-03-2015, at 15:14, jan i wrote: > > For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists. Jan, what mail lists would you recommend interested members follow? louis signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: Interoperability

2015-03-08 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi Marcus, 2015-03-08 16:33 GMT+01:00 Marcus : [...] > > What do you mean with boring subject? Education? I hope it's not seen as > boring because it is the key for everything in our life. ;-) I mean that I'm discussing about extensions which is a little off topics here. But I need a list of p

New reporting tool for PMC, and a mail list overview.

2015-03-08 Thread jan i
Hi For those who do not follow some of the foundation mailing lists. A new tool has arrived. It can be used by any PMC member: https://reporter.apache.org/?openoffice It contains information that makes it easier to write correct board reports, but it also contains general information which I wan

Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC FAQ update

2015-03-08 Thread jan i
On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 08/03/2015 Simon Phipps wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> What about actually doing something? >>> >> That, sir, is insulting. If you want to propose a resolution, >> do so, but please do not attempt to

Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC FAQ update

2015-03-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 08/03/2015 Simon Phipps wrote: On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: What about actually doing something? That, sir, is insulting. If you want to propose a resolution, do so, but please do not attempt to hand out jobs. Volunteering to do something is much more appreciated

Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC FAQ update

2015-03-08 Thread Dave Barton
Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 07/03/2015 Dave Barton wrote: >> Simon Phipps wrote: >>> when one does not have access to the privileged >>> conversations of the PMC, actions that use those conversations as >>> justification appear hostile, as do dismissive PMC member reactions > > Well, if it is true

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-03-08 Thread Marcus
Am 03/08/2015 04:52 PM, schrieb jan i: On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Marcus wrote: Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com: Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git? +1 any Git. the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make chan

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-03-08 Thread jan i
On Sunday, March 8, 2015, Marcus wrote: > Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com: > >> Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git? >> +1 any Git. >> > > the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make > changes on the website impossibl

Re: Interoperability

2015-03-08 Thread Marcus
Am 03/08/2015 11:13 AM, schrieb Guy Waterval: Hi Marcus, Hi all, 2015-03-06 18:45 GMT+01:00 Marcus: [...] Maybe it's a bit difficult to still find an interesting topic because of the hugh amount of extensions. But it is indeed a great start into OpenOffice development. You are right b

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

2015-03-08 Thread Marcus
Am 03/08/2015 02:08 AM, schrieb wolf.hal...@gmail.com: Why not move web development as well as the code development into Git? +1 any Git. the staging machine is relying on SVN. So, moving to Git would make changes on the website impossible - until someone rewrites the code that is doing the s

Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC FAQ update

2015-03-08 Thread Simon Phipps
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > You are suggesting a usage pattern of the private list that is far beyond > reality. > I am not. I am pointing out there is no way for me to know, and that the strong reactions to Dave's original (modest & reasonable) question as well as

Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC FAQ update

2015-03-08 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 07/03/2015 Dave Barton wrote: Simon Phipps wrote: when one does not have access to the privileged conversations of the PMC, actions that use those conversations as justification appear hostile, as do dismissive PMC member reactions Well, if it is true (and it is true) that the private list

Re: Interoperability

2015-03-08 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi Marcus, Hi all, 2015-03-06 18:45 GMT+01:00 Marcus : [...] > >> Maybe it's a bit difficult to still find an interesting topic because of >> the hugh amount of extensions. But it is indeed a great start into >> OpenOffice development. >> > You are right but there are perhaps also the possibili