Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Do you know off hand if this is through OLE or some other mechanism? I have been handed a docx files with something embedded inside that prevents viewing because I do not happen to have that particular application installed on my computer. On 10/25/2014 12:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: To

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/24/2014 08:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: below. -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML supp

Re: NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread Jose R R
Had not the 'curiosity' to write those words in OO until today: Re-check: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0xK0sECIAQVakq.png:large Using default US English spell-checker that comes with 4.1.1 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2014-10-24, 10:35 PM Jose R R wrote: >> >> Well,

Re: NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2014-10-24, 10:35 PM Jose R R wrote: Well, Alexandro, I think you may have added the plural of the word to your local dictionary ;-) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0xBe2_CQAEQITs.png Singular and plural spellings of both words are in my Canadian English dictionary on AOO. I have not added an

RE: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
To be clear, I can put a complete Word Document (as a binary blob) inside of an ODF Text document too. I just don't know if that particular avenue is what was taken as a smoking gun about OOXML or not. I can put a complete ODF Text document (as a binary blob) inside of an OOXML .docx too. The

Re: NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread Jose R R
Well, Alexandro, I think you may have added the plural of the word to your local dictionary ;-) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0xBe2_CQAEQITs.png On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > I tried to verify the report, and both words were valid. > > On 10/24/14, Alexandro Colorad

Re: Access to the list of Autofilter

2014-10-24 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/24/2014 07:06 PM, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: Hello, Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria... Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use filtering capabilit

Re: NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I tried to verify the report, and both words were valid. On 10/24/14, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > Add it to your word book, the dictionary project is managed outside of the > project. Check the extension page of the en-US dictionary > On Oct 24, 2014 9:49 PM, "C L" wrote: > >> To Whom It May Con

Re: NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Add it to your word book, the dictionary project is managed outside of the project. Check the extension page of the en-US dictionary On Oct 24, 2014 9:49 PM, "C L" wrote: > To Whom It May Concern: > > I am writing a school paper for a very important college and I am not > happy. Your program unde

NOT OKAY

2014-10-24 Thread C L
To Whom It May Concern: I am writing a school paper for a very important college and I am not happy. Your program underlined in red that the word vaginas is incorrect and penises is correct. I do not like this and it is very sexist. Please fix it!

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
below. -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?) On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: below. -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?) On 10

Re: Access to the list of Autofilter

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 25.10.2014 um 01:06 schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic: > Hello, > > Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data > in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria... > Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use > filterin

Access to the list of Autofilter

2014-10-24 Thread Vladislav Stevanovic
Hello, Is it possible with code in Basic to access to the list of Autofilter data in Calc? Reason: filtering with basic is limited maximum with 3 criteria... Because I need more then 3 criteria I want with basic code to use filtering capability of Autofilter. Thanks in advance, Wlada

Re: Partnership with schools

2014-10-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I have work with students doing their final project under the OpenOffice, as an ex-lead for the education project. we had some teachers doing open source projects withing the community, you can see their posts on the wiki: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/HitekSchool and Seneca: https://wiki.openof

Partnership with schools

2014-10-24 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi all, I wonder if we couldn't encourage schools to participate to the projet in a durable manner. Students have each year projects to realize alone or in teams. Why not to suggest works reusable by the project. After a discussion about that with a student who has contacts in a high school of en

Good news! We now have a Mac OSX buildbot!

2014-10-24 Thread Kay Schenk
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902 -- - MzK "Success breeds complacency. Complacency breeds failure. Only the paranoid survive." -- Andy Grove, Intel Co-founder ---

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-24 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 2014-10 -24, at 11:15, Roberto Galoppini > wrote: > > 2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir : > >> Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the >> continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a >> proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffic

Re: OpenOffice folks: ApacheCon template?

2014-10-24 Thread Rich Bowen
On 10/24/2014 03:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 24/10/2014 Rich Bowen wrote: One more try - can any of you fine OpenOffice folks whip up a slide template for ApacheCon EU, like was done for Denver? Let's forward this to the OpenOffice dev list too (in CC) and see if it is a yes! Volunteers

Re: OpenOffice folks: ApacheCon template?

2014-10-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 24/10/2014 Rich Bowen wrote: One more try - can any of you fine OpenOffice folks whip up a slide template for ApacheCon EU, like was done for Denver? Let's forward this to the OpenOffice dev list too (in CC) and see if it is a yes! Volunteers? Templates to be refreshed are here: http://te

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote: Let's try for a 4.1.2 release I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release and actually the two can work together really well. I would like to streamline our processes and remove bottlenecks and dependencies on non-Apache systems. In

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread Marcus
Am 10/24/2014 10:29 AM, schrieb RA Stehmann: On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: 1) Whatever

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-24 Thread Marcus
Thats a great idea. Unfortunately, I'm not a very "old-timer" so I cannot help with appropriate hardware or software. But maybe with writting texts or translating from German. Marcus Am 10/24/2014 04:41 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the cont

Re: failure notice mailer daemon

2014-10-24 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Am 24.10.2014 19:09, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 24/10/2014 Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote: >> the mailer daemon is going on the rampage. > > Please send this to infrastructure AT apache.org for analysis. they have > been working on the mail servers and spamassassin setup this week, and > there may

Re: failure notice mailer daemon

2014-10-24 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 24/10/2014 Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote: the mailer daemon is going on the rampage. Please send this to infrastructure AT apache.org for analysis. they have been working on the mail servers and spamassassin setup this week, and there may be some rough edges. Thanks, Andrea.

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: > > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: > >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to > have. > >> > >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: > >> > >> 1) Whatever new

failure notice mailer daemon

2014-10-24 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Hello, the mailer daemon is going on the rampage. The "unacceptable MIME part" was my GPG signature. Excepted since years. And I put some words in the body and gave a subject. I'm not able to moderate user postings. Kind regards Michael Original-Nachricht Betreff: failure n

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > 2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir : > >> Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the >> continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a >> proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice,

RE: the question about installing OO‘ sdk

2014-10-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
inline -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 01:03 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: the question about installing OO‘ sdk On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote: > Hi all, > I have some question about installing OO‘

RE: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
below. -Original Message- From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?) On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > But where i

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-24 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir : > Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the > continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a > proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which itself > started as StarWriter, an application written in 1

2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-24 Thread Rob Weir
Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which itself started as StarWriter, an application written in 1985 by Marco Börries . So next year, in 2015,

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: But where is the problem? Either OOXML *is* ISO standard or is not ISO-standard. If the problem is however that MS is 'meddling' in the standard, then it is a political issue that requires policy responses - not a question of software development.

Re: Bugzilla volunteer

2014-10-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:32 AM, FR web forum wrote: > Hello list, > I answer frequently in Bugzilla. > I propose to help and managing reports like set to Duplicate or Invalid. > If you are interesting, I remain available. > Thanks. This kind of database "hygiene" is always welcome. I've give

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] > >> Being a customer, I do see things differently. >> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. > > theoretically correct, but practically? > >> One day in future LO will save ODF as

Bugzilla volunteer

2014-10-24 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, I answer frequently in Bugzilla. I propose to help and managing reports like set to Duplicate or Invalid. If you are interesting, I remain available. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:00 AM, RA Stehmann wrote: > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. >> >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: >> >> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of >> course

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 24.10.2014 um 09:59 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: > On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> Hello, For example: >> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Berliner-Finanzaemter-wechseln-zurueck-auf-Microsoft-Office-2430961.html >> > > I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political

Re: Improved OOXML support?

2014-10-24 Thread FR web forum
>but there is no company within: >http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consultants.html >that wants to do the work. Maybe see with IBM: http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/ibm-support-for-apache-openoffice/ - To unsubscribe,

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread RA Stehmann
On 24.10.2014 11:14, Michal Hriň wrote: > > > Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a): >> On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >>> Hello, >>> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] >>> Being a customer, I do see things differently. Every OOXML file is a vote a

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Michal Hriň
Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a): On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] Being a customer, I do see things differently. Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. theoretically correct, but practically? One day in f

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread RA Stehmann
On 24.10.2014 10:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: >> On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >>> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. >>> >>> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: >>> >>> 1) Whatever new languages/language upd

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. >> >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: >> >> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of >> course dictionary upd

Re: the question about installing OO‘ sdk

2014-10-24 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote: > Hi all, > I have some question about installing OO‘ sdk. I know that this topic is > might not be appropriate for discussing at here. But I can't subscribe to > the a...@openoffice.apache.org, It always return me the message like below > at the step I confirm

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

2014-10-24 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] > >> Being a customer, I do see things differently. >> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. > > theoretically correct, but practically? > >> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secon

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

2014-10-24 Thread RA Stehmann
On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: > A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. > > Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: > > 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of > course dictionary updates. > > 2) Fixes for any critical bugs, e