Agreed!
The dev list is the only official way to communicate with all users of
NuttX. I would think ALL important discussions need to occur there.
Github is for developers; dev is for everyone.
On 3/7/2023 11:43 AM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:27 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:27 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
> Some important things to keep in mind to avoid these kind of frustration:
>
> 1) NuttX development is on GitHub, although this mailing list has dev@ in
> its name, the development is not here. In the past Greg used to accept
> patches over ma
Some important things to keep in mind to avoid these kind of frustration:
1) NuttX development is on GitHub, although this mailing list has dev@ in
its name, the development is not here. In the past Greg used to accept
patches over mailing list. But now NuttX is an Apache project TLP;
2) You cann
Greg,
Thanks. The commit link is there:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/commit/e6227e19433c4999d500437d0a8a5c05f476ceb1
Here is the pull request
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/8623
This pull request was written and reviewed by xiaomi (again) and only
ONE independent review (thanks for
Hi,
I agree with Nathan. The "V=0" -- seems to be an explicit option for "no
verbose" compilation (in other worlds should suppress all the outputs
except errors I hope).
Best regards,
Petro
вт, 7 бер. 2023 р. о 15:59 Nathan Hartman пише:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:12 AM Sebastien Lorquet
> wr
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:12 AM Sebastien Lorquet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
>
> I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
I agree. I think it should be:
* No V argument: Make behaves as originally
* V=0: Make's current behavior
It is likely that the issue with the SIGNAL number was introduced by
commit e6227e19433c4999d500437d0a8a5c05f476ceb1
Author: chenrun1
Date: Wed Feb 1 17:17:43 2023 +0800
include/signal.h:Expanding SIGNAL to be consistent with Linux
There is nothing inherently wrong with the
GitHub, I find, is not
too hard to keep on top of as at least I am committing PRs, now, fairly
regularly.
Perhaps it needs a policy decision on what the two platforms intent is?
Just my two penny's worth :)
From: Sebastien Lorquet
Sent: 07 March 2023 13:12
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Sub
ubject: Re: Build system is broken
Hi,
Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
Can this silent mode be made optional in a config setting please? It is really
a non-feature. it's just a fantasy to please some commit
mars 2023 14:12
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build system is broken
Hi,
Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
Can this silent mode be made optional in a config setting please? It is really
a non-feature. it&#
Hi,
Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
Can this silent mode be made optional in a config setting please? It is
really a non-feature. it's just a fantasy to please some committer, and
should have never been acce
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:23 AM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> > No
> > V=1 is an entirely different thing.
> > I dont want to see the output mangled with tons of arm-none-eabi-gcc
> > command lines.
> > This stuff is another breakage
> > Sebastien
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> No
> V=1 is an entirely different thing.
> I dont want to see the output mangled with tons of arm-none-eabi-gcc
> command lines.
> This stuff is another breakage
> Sebastien
Well if the build is silent and you do not know what happens then
No
V=1 is an entirely different thing.
I dont want to see the output mangled with tons of arm-none-eabi-gcc
command lines.
This stuff is another breakage
Sebastien
On 3/7/23 09:22, Marco Casaroli wrote:
Try
make V=1
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 09:18, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
Hi,
This morn
Try
make V=1
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 09:18, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This morning I updated my working copy, ran git pull origin master and
> rebuilt my OS
>
> Now when I run make I get no output. But the cpu fan works.
>
> Only the last line of the console shows text, there is no log m
15 matches
Mail list logo
