Hi,
Do your realize how counter-intuitive this is?
I would have NEVER imagined that V=0 is not the exact contrary of V=1!
Can this silent mode be made optional in a config setting please? It is
really a non-feature. it's just a fantasy to please some committer, and
should have never been accepted imho.
When I want to contribute a one liner to submit a new flash chip I get
forced to wait 48 hours for useless automatic tests that will not even
compile my new code, and such profound changes gets integrated
immediately with almost no review other than an automatic build. I know
it because some commits do not have corresponding pull requests.
This gives a feeling of double standard that does not seem in line with
the inviolables of this project.
Tomek: Thanks, but I am not interested in workarounds that look like
"here is a way to avoid asking why a change was made".
Sebastien
On 3/7/23 13:45, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:23 AM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 9:24 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote:
No
V=1 is an entirely different thing.
I dont want to see the output mangled with tons of arm-none-eabi-gcc
command lines.
This stuff is another breakage
Sebastien
There is V=0 which gives the same output as before.
It needs to be documented somehow, and in a way that people will see it, or
we will get a lot of complaints and questions about it after the next
release.
Nathan
