Hi Greg,
Thank you responding. Then I will I will test it.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:03 PM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is the only option for using the network monitor
On 9/17/2020 1:59 PM, David
David,
I've been trying to figure out how you would do this on Linux. This seems
to be the right answer. Done via a "lease" configuration for dhcpd, or via
secondary static IP on the interface
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12727175/set-static-ip-if-not-obtained-from-dhcp-script
For your pur
On 9/17/2020 1:59 PM, David Sidrane wrote:
Is the only option for using the network monitor
Hi,
My goal is to have a run time option to use a static IP or DHCP. (Curretly
it is compile time)
If either are used I want to "auto up" the eth0. Once the interface comes up
, if configured for
Is the only option for using the network monitor
Hi,
My goal is to have a run time option to use a static IP or DHCP. (Curretly
it is compile time)
If either are used I want to "auto up" the eth0. Once the interface comes up
, if configured for DHCP it should make start the DHCP request pro
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 9:35 AM Anthony Merlino wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I just ran into an issue on both 9.0 and 9.1 with SD card operations.
> After digging for a bit, I found the issue was addressed here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/e21dd687555180b41e845a2c0676fdc96fc95
Hi all,
So I just ran into an issue on both 9.0 and 9.1 with SD card operations.
After digging for a bit, I found the issue was addressed here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/e21dd687555180b41e845a2c0676fdc96fc952ed
I completely understand that it takes work to patch and regres
Hi folks,
Can we get this sorted out please:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:25 AM Anthony Merlino wrote:
>
> FYI: I STILL do not have access to the Github organization.
>
> I have tried changing my email everywhere in apache to match my primary
> email on Github. I've tried re-adding my Github accou
FYI: I STILL do not have access to the Github organization.
I have tried changing my email everywhere in apache to match my primary
email on Github. I've tried re-adding my Github account through the ASF
portal multiple times. I've tried emailing us...@infra.apache.org and never
even got a respons
The automated check is not to replaced the commiter task of reading the
description of course,
it is to automate the mundane tasks of responding a trivial "please describe
your PR".
I'm not sure what you mean by checking the commit message, as there's no
template for that. And as I said,
let tr
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:02 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > That's why we have committers. It's been said, but I'll repeat: As
> > committers, I know it's mundane, but we really need to make sure the
> commit
> > and PR messages will be helpful to someone who looks at them in the
> future.
>
> But
That's why we have committers. It's been said, but I'll repeat: As
committers, I know it's mundane, but we really need to make sure the commit
and PR messages will be helpful to someone who looks at them in the future.
But it would help the committer by at least assuring that there is
someth
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:26 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > An alternative is to use a workflow. For example this action does
> something in that line:
> https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pull-request-ticket-check-action
> >
> I think including the a PR comment check in the PR checks is a grea
An alternative is to use a workflow. For example this action does something in
that line:
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pull-request-ticket-check-action
I think including the a PR comment check in the PR checks is a great
idea if it is feasible: If a section is blank, the check fa
An alternative is to use a workflow. For example this action does something in
that line:
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pull-request-ticket-check-action
Sep 17, 2020 09:51:38 Matias N. :
> Thanks, I'll have a look. Manually adding text to a PR to prove yourself is
> really not desirea
Have a look at this project.
https://github.com/foosel/GitIssueBot
It requires you to include a specific phrase in the description, proving
that you have read the contribution guide.
Στις Πέμ, 17 Σεπ 2020 στις 3:33 μ.μ., ο/η Matias N. έγραψε:
> Regarding following the PR template: yes, I have s
Regarding following the PR template: yes, I have seen this several times. A few
thoughts:
* We can add one comment line to each PR description section in the template
like . This can be annoying to the rest
who don't need the reminder.
* Add a CONTRIBUTING.md to the repo, it appears linked as s
The problem as I see it is not for the PR only since we merged commits that
have the same issues.
Try "git log" in a console and you will see that most commits have only a
title without a commit message and context.
This may become a problem if in the future we want to understand why a commit
PR's without adequate information
We are getting a slew of PR's without adequate information to consider
merging them. Some of the Titles are incomplete or misleading.
I am also concerned about bloat and the loss of one of NuttX major
advantages: Scalability.
I have no doubt, there is a great d
18 matches
Mail list logo
