The problem as I see it is not for the PR only since we merged commits that have the same issues.
Try "git log" in a console and you will see that most commits have only a title without a commit message and context. This may become a problem if in the future we want to understand why a commit was added without going back and studying the PR message. To address this issue I tried to educate the authors so I started working on a commit guideline document that can help us align on how a commit title and message should look. We can expand the same to the PR and educate ourselves so that we end with a clean description for each PR and commit Where should I publish this document? Regards Alin -----Original Message----- From: David Sidrane <david.sidr...@nscdg.com> Sent: den 17 september 2020 11:59 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: PR's without adequate information PR's without adequate information We are getting a slew of PR's without adequate information to consider merging them. Some of the Titles are incomplete or misleading. I am also concerned about bloat and the loss of one of NuttX major advantages: Scalability. I have no doubt, there is a great deal of value being added but for* only some users**.* The changes are coming in with no way to disable them. I would ask that PR have all the description sections filled in and provide justification. I have seen this asked for repeatedly by several of the committers. We also have some excellent examples now or PRs that offer great context. Please model your submission after those PR. Helping a reviewer gain the context, of Why, How, and What, will speed PR review and acceptance. Having to look at a PR and infer the intent waste of everyone's time. David