roject, assign it to Siegfried.
- Robert
From: rfscho...@codehaus.org
To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:34:57 +0000
Subject: RE: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler
Brett,
Just checking: license doesn't seem to be the problem, right?
And also good to know
+0100
From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler
+1
On 19 September 2010 17:55, Robert Scholte wrote:
LicenseThis program is free software licensed under the BSD license, the head
subproject (the code which is attac
> it, but I expect there should be someone else who can answer that.
>
> > From: br...@apache.org
> > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:57 -0700
> > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler
>
> >
> > What'
t; From: br...@apache.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:57 -0700
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler
>
> What's the license on launch4j?
>
> Does it require a similar app layout?
>
> I'm not oppose
/)
About the app-layout, I can't answer that right now. I should investigate it,
but I expect there should be someone else who can answer that.
> From: br...@apache.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:57 -0700
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal
What's the license on launch4j?
Does it require a similar app layout?
I'm not opposed, though also inclined towards splitting the JSW part out and
keeping them all separate but able to work on an assembled directory.
On 19/09/2010, at 9:29 AM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the plugi
