Brett,
Just checking: license doesn't seem to be the problem, right? And also good to know there's someone on board with enough experience and willing to help. Once confirmed I think we should be able to pick this up. - Robert Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:38:22 +0100 From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler +1 On 19 September 2010 17:55, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote: LicenseThis program is free software licensed under the BSD license, the head subproject (the code which is attached to the wrapped jars) is licensed under the MIT license. Launch4j may be used for wrapping closed source, commercial applications. (from http://launch4j.sourceforge.net/) About the app-layout, I can't answer that right now. I should investigate it, but I expect there should be someone else who can answer that. > From: br...@apache.org > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:57 -0700 > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler > > What's the license on launch4j? > > Does it require a similar app layout? > > I'm not opposed, though also inclined towards splitting the JSW part out and > keeping them all separate but able to work on an assembled directory. > > On 19/09/2010, at 9:29 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > One of the plugin-submissions under jira is the so-called 'native > > executable wrapper plugin'[1], based on launch4j. > > It think there's some room under the appassembler[2] to add this as a new > > goal, something like "generate-executables". > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Robert > > > > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-176 > > [2] http://mojo.codehaus.org/appassembler > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
