Congratulations Matthias ! Well deserved!
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Congrats, Matthias!
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Matthias! Congratulations!
> >
> > Konstantine
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 a
Congratulations Rajini!
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote:
> Congratulations Rajini! Bravissima!
> --
>
> Edoardo Comar
>
> IBM Message Hub
>
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
>
> From: Guozhang Wang
> To: dev@kafk
+1
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Manikumar
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Rajini Sivaram
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks, Ismael!
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Damian Guy
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 15:47 Ismael Juma wrote:
> > >
>
+1
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> +1
>
> -Jay
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > I think we can continue on this voting thread.
> >
> > Currently we have one binding vote and 2 non-binging votes. I would like
> to
> > call out for other people es
+1
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 6/23/17 9:45 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the KIP!
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> -Bill
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Damian Guy
> wro
+1
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> I know i voted before, but now my vote is binding so...
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 23:46 Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 5/18/17 8:26 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:54 A
Congratulations Ismael!
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Congratulations, Ismael!
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
> >
> > Ismael Juma has been active in the Kafka community since he became
> > a Kafka committer about a year ago. I am
Congratulations Jason!
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Congratulations, Jason!
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Jason!
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Guozhang Wang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
+1
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 at 07:13 Eno Thereska wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Thanks Bill.
> >
> > Eno
> > > On 12 Jul 2017, at 09:12, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Now that we've concluded a second round of di
+1!
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> 1.0! Let's do it!
>
> -Jay
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With 0.11.0.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the
> > release manager
> > for our next time-based feature release.
+1
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 7/20/17 4:22 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After working on the PR for this KIP I discovered that we need to add
> and
> > > additiona
+1
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1. Thanks Damian!
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Damian Guy
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like
mian Guy wrote:
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I've just realised we need to add two methods to StateStoreBuilder
> or
> > >> it
> > >>>> isn't going to work:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
+1
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Randall Hauch wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Randall
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Please take a look at the following and cast your vote:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 197+Connect+REST+API+
+1
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1, thanks.
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We want to deprecate it for 1.0.0 release. Unclear how lon
+1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Randall Hauch wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-199 to add a command line tool that
> > will
> > > allow Connect ope
+1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for this. Can't wait for more complete monitoring for Connect.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:40 AM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-196 to add metrics to the Kafka Connect
> > framework so the wo
gt; >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Sriram Subramanian
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Gwen Shapira
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for this.
FWIW, I agree that time metrics have been very useful in the past. The
reasoning around perf overhead seems reasonable as well. Can we agree on a
subset of time metrics that we feel would be super useful for debugging?
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Roger Hoover
wrote:
> Thanks, Ewen.
>
> I ag
Thanks for driving the release Damian.
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:18 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> Thanks for driving this Damian!
>
>
> Guozhang
>
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>>
>> The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for Apache
>> Kafka 0.11.
Sorry, wrong thread.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Sriram Subramanian
wrote:
>
>
++1
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 26, 2016, at 7:24 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> Hi Kafka Developers,
>
> Just a quick heads-up that I added a new section to the KIP template: "Test
> Plans".
> I think its a good habit to think about how a feature will be tested while
> planning it. I'm talking
+1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Shikhar Bhushan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Since there isn't much to discuss with this KIP, bringing it to a vote
>
+1
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Henry Cai
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Michael Noll wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Damian Guy
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Henry - we've updated the KIP with an example and the new config
> > > parameter
and v2 alive at the same time
> > >> > >
> > >> > > That's right. But the current live instance will be able to tell
> > >> other
> > >> > > instances, via its endpoint setting, whether it wants to be
> > contacted
> >
So, it looks like QueryableStoreTypes would be part of the streams library,
right? If a developer needs to support a new store, would they need to
change code in streams?
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Cool, I'm +1 after the updates.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:50
Could you describe how recovery works in this mode? Say, we had a 250 MB
preallocated segment and we wrote till 50MB and crashed. Till what point
do we recover? Also, on startup, how is the append end pointer set even on
a clean shutdown? How does the FileChannel end position get set to 50 MB
inste
:12 AM
>> >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to improve
>>consume
>> >>performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> >>
>> >> Hi Sriram,
>> >> One sentenc
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Shikhar Bhushan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to initiate a vote on KIP-89
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 89%3A+A
+1 (binding)
I second Ewen's point about compatibility.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 05:58 Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Also, see my notes in discussion thread around future compatibility
> > discussions for br
I agree that the metadata topic is required to build a batching semantic
that is intuitive.
One question on the config -
autostop.at
I see one value for it - eol. What other values can be used? Instead, why
would we not have batch.mode=true/false?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matthias J. Sa
@Jay
1. I totally agree on the naming. The appid for transactions is really an
instance id. Any recommendation for a name is appreciated. We had thought
of instance id, session id or app id and went with app id.
2. We also discussed about init() method but that could add its own set of
confusion t
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Mat
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Colin, +1 (binding) from me.
>
> I agree with Rajini's suggestions. Also, since the command is a public
> interface, it would be good to include details in the KIP.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM,
I am not sure if it is a good idea to support both init() and lazy
initialization. The ideal state would have been to implement init as a non
blocking api and have the rest of the methods throw uninitialized exception
if init was not called. This would ensure that init can still be used by
other no
Radai,
I think it is important to understand the key requirements that we don’t
want to compromise. We can then understand the tradeoffs of the different
approaches. We did in fact start with the double journal approach couple of
years back. I will highlight the must have requirements first and th
small correction in my third point -
3. IO and memory constraints - We would want a solution that *does not take*
2x the number of writes.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Sriram Subramanian
wrote:
> Radai,
>
> I think it is important to understand the key requirements that we don’t
+1
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Hojjat Jafarpour
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Seems that there is no opposition to this KIP. This email is to start the
> > voting for this KIP.
> > Once again the KIP is for removing z
+1
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Ian Wrigley wrote:
> +1 from me too. When I talk to people in training classes, who are
> typically much newer to Kafka, they tend to be surprised (and
> scared/horrified) that the default is true. Much safer to set it to false
> and let people change it when
+1
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:40 AM Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Ewen
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I'm glad this super-common use-case will becom
+1. Great work in driving this to a consensus. Lots of good constructive
conversations.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Jason Gustafson
wrote:
> +1 from me (duh). Thanks to all the reviewers. The KIP has been much
> improved because of it!
>
> -Jason
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Ismael
+1
Thanks Ismael for volunteering to run the next time based release.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the feedback. Since everyone was in favour and we had
> covered this particular case in the time-based release plan[1], I went
> ahead and updated the w
+1. Looks good
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> Hah, I forgot to do it in the original email, but I suppose I should make
> it explicit: +1 (binding)
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 a
StreamsBuilder would be my vote.
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:42 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> Hey Matthias,
>
> Make sense, I'm more advocating for removing the word topology than any
> particular new replacement.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
>> Jay,
>>
+1 (binding)
Nice work in driving this.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I expressed few concerns in the discussion thread, but in general this is
> super important to get done.
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
To add to this discussion, I do think we should think about this in
increments. We do a full recovery today and the EOS proposal will not make
this any worse. Using store snapshot is a good option to avoid store
recovery in the future but as Eno points out, all pluggable stores would
need to have t
ight pay it for a transaction failure. Will transaction failures
> be
> > more or less common than the previous types of failures?
>
> Damian voiced similar concerns at the very beginning of this discussion,
> not sure what his current opinion is here.
>
> -Michael
>
&
+1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks Matthias,
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Apurva Mehta
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Jay
> > >
> > > On Mon, M
+1
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Damian Guy
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Matthias.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 201
+1
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:48 PM Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 4/21/17 10:39 AM, Eno Thereska wrote:
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > Un
The failure really means that the filesystem is configured incorrectly
(from the link). In such circumstances it is best to fail and let the
operations/admins know instead of working around it.
On 1/24/15 9:42 AM, "Jay Kreps" wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>Jaikiran posted a patch on KAFKA-1853 to improve
+1
On 2/19/15 12:08 PM, "Neha Narkhede" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Joel Koshy wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:03:26PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
>> > +1 binding
>> >
>> > ~ Joestein
>> > On Feb 18, 2015 6:50 PM, "Jay Kreps" wrote:
>> >
>> >
Congratulations!
On 2/25/15 11:15 AM, "Joe Stein" wrote:
>Awesome!
>
>The future of schema management, has arrived
>
>~ Joestein
>
>On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Gwen Shapira
>wrote:
>
>> Congrats, Confluent team.
>>
>> This is super exciting :)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:31 AM
+1
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> I would have preferred not to bundle transformations, but since SMT
> capability is a much needed feature, I'll take it in its current form.
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Shikhar Bhushan
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like
+1
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:07 PM Rajini Sivaram
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to start the voting proce
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Ismael,
>
> Thank you for the KIP. It is a very useful feature.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I w
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 1/6/17 8:01 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Damian Guy
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at
ously voted?
>
> Thank you
> no
>
> > On 6 Jan 2017, at 17:31, Sriram Subramanian wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 1/6/17 8:01 AM, Guozhang Wa
+1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
> (hit send too soon)
>
> +1 (non-binding).. that is a very well written KIP!
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote:
>
> > +1, that1
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> >
> >> +1 - thanks Ismael!
Congratulations Grant!
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Grant Henke to join as a
> committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted!
>
> Grant contributed 88 patches, 90 code reviews, countless great
> comments on discussio
+1
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 9:17 AM, radai wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> under ismael's "facet" approach we could always start with
> AdminClient.topics() and then pile on more of them later.
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
>>
>> +1 I think its important to focus this KIP discussio
+1
Verified signatures, tests and docs
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified signatures, quickstart, docs.
>
> Thanks for running the release, Ewen!
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:42 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Verified signature
Thanks Ewen for driving this.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks Ewen for driving the release!
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava >
> wrote:
>
> > The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for Apache
> > Kafk
Congratulations!
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Congratulations, very well deserved.
> On Apr 25, 2016 10:53 PM, "Neha Narkhede" wrote:
>
> > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Ismael Juma to join as a committer
> and
> > we are pleased to announce that he has accepted
Congrats!
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Congrats Ewen!
>
> -Jay
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce that the Apache Kafka PMC has voted to
> > invite Ewen Cheslack-Postava as a committer and Ewen has accepted.
> >
> > Ewen
+1
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kafka,
>>
>>After a long discussion, please help vote again for the
>> KIP. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAF
I am still not convinced why a stream processing framework closely tied to
Kafka will not help with this (since we are also referring to some basic
transformations). The devil is in the details of the design and I would be
able to better comment on it after that. I would love to see a detailed
desi
Congrats Gwen!
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
>
> I am pleased to announce that the Apache Kafka PMC has voted to invite Gwen
> Shapira as a committer and Gwen has accepted.
>
> Please join me on welcoming and congratulating Gwen.
>
> Thanks for the contribution both in the pr
+1. This was long due!
On 7/14/15, 4:42 PM, "Guozhang Wang" wrote:
>+1. Thanks Ewen!!
>
>On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks Ewen for taking on something that the Kafka project has long
>>waited
>> for!
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Jay
+1 for consistency.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Personally, I prefer the consistency and 2 spaces for indentation. Although
> I'm in agreement with Jay about the ambition to eventually move the server
> code to Java, I'd hate to make that a blocker for discussing a si
I think Kafka and streaming are synonymous. Kafka streams or Kafka
streaming really does not indicate "stream processing".
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Prefer something that evokes "stream processing on top of Kafka". And since
> I've heard many people conflate "stream
I had the same thought. Kafka processor, KProcessor or even Kafka
stream processor is more relevant.
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Martin Kleppmann wrote:
>
> I'm with Sriram -- Kafka is all about streams already (or topics, to be
> precise, but we're calling it "stream processing" not "topic
+1
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Looks good to me too - simple, usable and the use-case is clear.
>
> Gwen
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've added KIP-75 - Add per-connector Converters
> >
> > https://cwiki.apa
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Damian Guy wrote:
>
> > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-71 (
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 71
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-75:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 75+-+Add+per-connector+Converters
>
> I'll kick things off with a +1 (binding).
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ewen
Congratulations Gwen!
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Gwen!
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:44 PM Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
> >
> > Gwen Shapira has been active in the Kafka community since she became a
> > Kafka committer
> > about a ye
I think the manual way of setting the throttling value is a good first step
and definitely required when things go bad. We should continue discussing
how we can build more intelligence over this incrementally.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Ben Stopford wrote:
> I’d like to initi
Congratulations Jason!
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote:
> Congratulations Jason on this very well deserved recognition.
>
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Neha Narkhede
> To: "dev@kafka.apache.org" ,
> "us...@kafka.apache.org"
> Cc: "priv...@kafka.apache.org"
> Date:
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-78: Cluster Id:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
>
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good fi
+1 binding
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
>
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a
Sounds good to me.
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 8:22 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> It sounds like the general consensus is in favor of time-based releases. We
> can continue the discussion about LTS, but I wanted to go ahead and get
> things moving forward by volunteering to manage the n
+1
Plan looks good to me. Thanks a lot for putting this together!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've volunteered to be release manager for the upcoming 0.10.1 release and
> would like to propose the following timeline:
>
> Feature Freeze (Sep. 19): The 0.
+1 (binding)
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (binding) - yay for a new release!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 13,
Thanks Jason!
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the update Jason. :)
>
> Ismael
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Jason Gustafson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Pardon all the JIRA noise, but I've been busy reducing the scope to match
> > the available time sin
Fantastic release and on time! Congratulations everyone for our first time
based release.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your contributions to this release. I think it's
> impressive how much has been achieved in just under 5 months.
>
> And special th
FWIW, Apache Kafka has evolved a lot from where it started. It did start as
a messaging system. Over time we realized that that the vision for Kafka is
to build a streaming platform and not just a messaging system. You can take
a look at the site for more description about what comprises the stream
-1 for all the reasons that have been described before. This does not need
to be part of the core project.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
> +1.
>
> This is an http access to core Kafka. This is very much needed as part of
> Apache Kafka under ASF governance model. This
Congratulations!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Congratulations Becket. :)
>
> Ismael
>
> On 31 Oct 2016 1:44 pm, "Joel Koshy" wrote:
>
> > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Jiangjie (Becket) Qin to join as a
> > committer and we are pleased to announce that he has ac
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Tom Crayford wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2017 at 00:28, Michael André Pearce <
> michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 , really good to see better operational visibility being added to the
> > broker.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > >
+1
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would like to
> > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker
> > reconne
+1
> On May 7, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> Since this is a relatively simple change, I would like to start the voting
> process for KIP-153 : Include only client traffic in BytesOutPerSec metric.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-153+%
> 3A+In
+1
> On May 7, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> [Seems like the original message ended up in the discuss thread in GMail,
> so trying again]
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I believe I addressed the comments in the discussion thread and given the
> impending KIP freeze, I would like to start the
+1
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/5/17, 5:51 am, "Randall Hauch" wrote:
> >
> >
+1
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:43 PM, dan wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> thanks Konstantine :thumbsup:
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > Thanks hea
+1
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:32 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1. Also not sure that adding a parameter to a CLI requires a KIP. It
> seems
> > excessive.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM Jay Kreps wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> >
+1
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Thanks,
> Ewen
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:54 PM, BigData dev
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bharat
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Konstantine Karantasis <
> > konstant...@confl
+1
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > +1. Thank you!
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Xavier Léauté
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Since there aren't any objections
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
