+1 On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:43 PM, dan <dan.norw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding) > > thanks Konstantine :thumbsup: > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Stephane Maarek < > > steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > Thanks heaps I can’t wait! > > > > > > > > > On 9/5/17, 4:48 am, "Konstantine Karantasis" <konstant...@confluent.io > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > ** Restarting the voting thread here, with a different title to > avoid > > > collapsing this thread's messages with the discussion thread's > > > messages in > > > mail clients. Apologies for the inconvenience. ** > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Given that the comments during the discussion seem to have been > > > addressed, > > > I'm pleased to bring > > > > > > KIP-146: Classloading Isolation in Connect > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 146+-+Classloading+Isolation+in+Connect > > > > > > up for voting. Again, this KIP aims to bring the highly desired > > > feature of > > > dependency isolation in Kafka Connect. > > > > > > In the meantime, for any additional feedback, please continue to > send > > > your > > > comments in the discussion thread here: > > > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg71453.html > > > > > > This voting thread will stay active for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Konstantine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > > >
