+1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 > > -Ewen > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:07 PM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-102 - Add close with > > > timeout for consumers*: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 102+-+Add+close+with+timeout+for+consumers > > > > > > > > > > > > This KIP adds a new close method with a timeout for consumers similar > to > > > the close method in the producer. As described in the discussion thread > > > < > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201612. > mbox/%3cCAG_+ > > n9us5ohthwmyai9pz4s2j62fmils2ufj8oie9jpmyaf...@mail.gmail.com%3e > > > >, > > > the changes are only in the close code path and hence the impact is not > > too > > > big. The existing close() method without a timeout will use a default > > > timeout of 30 seconds. > > > > > > > > > Thank you.... > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Neha > > >
