Hi Devs,
If there are no more comments, I will start vote on this KIP later this
week.
Thanks
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Manikumar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Can you add a sample Jaas configuration using delegation tokens to the
>> KIP?
>>
>
> Will add sam
Hi,
I would like to initiate the vote on KIP-48:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-48+
Delegation+token+support+for+Kafka
Thanks,
Manikumar
Hi,
java producer waits for the metadata of the given topic to be available. We
will get
TimeoutException if we didn't get metadata within max.block.ms. As observed
by you, this
behavior is different from old producer. "retries" config is not
applicable to metadata fetch.
We can adjust max.block.
+1 (non-binding)
Verified artifacts and quick start
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Mathieu Fenniak <
mathieu.fenn...@replicon.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Upgraded KS & KC applications to 0.10.2.1 RC1, successfully ran
> application-level acceptance tests.
>
> Mathieu
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 1
update the terminology
tokenUID => tokenID.
> 107.3 How does each broker know about changes in tokens? Does each broker
> register a watcher for /tokenauth/tokens?
>
Yes, the changes are updated through zk notifications.
> 107.4 How is token deletion handled? Does every broker delet
uthentication time.
>
>
> 110. The diagrams in the wiki still show MD5 digest. Could you change it to
> SCRAM?
>
>
Updated the diagram.
Thanks,
Manikumar
>
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Manikumar
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec
+1 for ismael's suggestion. grouping of methods by the relevant resource
will simply the
API. In future, we will be adding delegation token related operations to
admin client.
I can imagine methods like adminClient.token().create(...),
adminClient.token().renew(...), etc..
Thanks,
Manikuma
Agree, we can run the token expiry check thread as part of controller
broker.
WIll update the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> > Please see the replies inline.
> >
> >
> >
thread for impersonation related discussion.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Roger Hoover wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> How does it allow impersonation at the connection level? Looking at the
> KIP, the DelegationTokenRequest does not have an "Owner" field that can
e same time, but only one will succeed. So, we will have to
> deal
> > > with failures in that case? Another way is to let just one broker (say,
> > the
> > > controller) deletes expired tokens.
> > >
> > > It would also be helpful for others to give fee
e extend
the support to allow a user to acquire delegation tokens for other users,
then we can enable
CREATE/DELETE operations. Updated the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> >
> > > If a token expir
Yes, owners and the renewers can always describe their own tokens. Updated
the KIP.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Mani,
>
> Thanks for the update. Just a minor comment below. Otherwise, +1 from me.
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > 116. Could you document the ACL rules associated with
Thank you all for your votes and feedback.
The vote has passed with 4 binding votes(Gwen, Jun, Grant, Harsha) and 2
non-binding votes(Roger, Dong Lin).
I have updated the relevant wiki pages.
Thanks
Manikumar
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
&g
Sorry, I am late to this discussion.
PrincipalBuilder is only used for SSL Protocol.
For SASL, we use "sasl.kerberos.principal.to.local.rules" config to map
SASL principal names to short names. To make it consistent,
Do we also need to pass the SASL full principal name to authorizer ?
We may need
s a discussion how kafka-acls.sh would
> > work with this change, on the ticket, we designed a detailed solution to
> > make this tool generally usable with all sorts of combinations of
> > Authorizers and PrincipalBuilders and give more flexibility to the end
> > users.
>
.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jun,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure sounds good to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > &g
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
80%3A+Kafka+Rest+Server
Your comments and feedback are welcome.
Thanks,
Manikumar
number
of distributions/builds.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> There's already a REST interface maintained as a separate project--it's
> open source and apache licensed and actively maintained (
> https://github.com/conf
+1 (non-binding)
verified quick start and artifacts.
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> One more RC for 0.10.1.0. We're hoping this is the final one so that we
> can meet the release target date of Oct. 17 (Monday).
fka/0.10.1.0/k
> > > > > > afka_2.11-0.10.1.0.tgz
> > > > > > https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/kafka/0.10.1.0/k
> > > > > > afka_2.10-0.10.1.0.tgz
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks to the 115 cont
Hi,
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
Regards,
Manikumar
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:41 AM Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks, Rajini!
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, at 09:52, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:54 PM David Jacot wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP! Simple yet very useful.
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:24 AM Robert Barrett
> wrote:
>
>
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:12 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> +1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Do we need to have a separate JIRA to update the docs as it introduces new
> metrics and a change in behavior for the existing metric?
>
>
>
> On
Hi,
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the updated KIP. LGTM.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:14 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Bumping this, I'd be happy to get some additional feedback and/or votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 20
Date: Oct 30, 2019 (tentative)
Please plan accordingly for the features you want push into Apache Kafka
2.4.0 release.
Regards,
Manikumar
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:08 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering Manikumar. +1
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM
Hi all,
I would like to revive this minor KIP related to
"sasl.kerberos.principal.to.local.rules" config.
This KIP adds support to convert Kerberos principal names to uppercase.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-309%3A+Add+toUpperCase+support+to+sasl.kerberos.principal.to.loca
Hi David,
Yes, we can include KIP-511. KIP must be accepted by KIP Freeze date (Sep
25, 2019 )
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:53 PM David Jacot wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Could we add KIP-511 to the plan? I think it will make it.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Tue,
Hi Viktor,
Yes, we can include KIP-434.
Thanks,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:09 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Can we please also include KIP-434?
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-434%3A+Add+Replica+Fetcher+and+Log+Cleaner+Count+Metric
Hi Mickael,
Yes, we can include. Added KIP-396 to the wiki page for tracking.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Can we also include KIP-396?
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97551484
ailing tests.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:08 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
> Yes, we can include. Added KIP-396 to the wiki page for tracking.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Manikumar
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:36 PM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
Hi all,
I would like to start vote on this trivial KIP-309:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP
-309%3A+Add+toUpperCase+support+to+sasl.kerberos.principal.to.local+rule
Thanks,
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM. This will be useful.
Thanks,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:17 PM Harsha Chintalapani
wrote:
> Thanks. +1 LGTM.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:19 AM, Kevin Lu wrote:
>
> > Hi Harsha,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. I have added *last-poll-seconds-ago* to the
Hi,
Added KIP-401 to the wiki page for tracking.
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:55 AM Paul Whalen wrote:
> Manikumar,
>
> KIP-401 was accepted a few weeks ago and there is a PR pending review, can
> it be included in the release as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> O
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:41 AM Harsha Chintalapani
wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
>
> -Harsha
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:07 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP, I can see this being really useful!
> >
> > On
+1 (binding) from me
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:39 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Thanks for KIP, Manikumar!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:11 PM Harsha Chintalapani
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
Hi All,
The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Harsha, Rajini, Manikumar).
Thanks for the votes.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:55 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) from me
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:39 PM Rajini Sivaram
> wrote
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 2:49 AM Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks, Rajini.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, at 00:43, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start vote on KIP-525 to return configs in CreateTopics
Hi Rajini,
Added KIP-525 to the release plan for tracking.
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:36 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> Can we add KIP-525 (
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-525+-+Return+topic+metadata+and+configs+in+Create
Hi All,
Just a reminder that tomorrow (Sep 25, 2019) is the last date for KIP
acceptance for 2.4.0 release.
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 7:05 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi Rajini,
>
> Added KIP-525 to the release plan for tracking.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24
Hi all,
I have included all the approved KIPs for 2.4.0 release.
Thanks,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:28 AM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Hi, Manikumar.
>
> Thanks for acting as release manager. Can we please add the following KIPs
> that have all been approved with PRs either merged or
you think about delaying the feature freeze and code
> > freeze by a week, to allow our community to enjoy Kafka Summit?
> >
> > Gwen
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:58 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Manikumar.
> > >
> > &g
Hi all,
Let's extend the feature freeze deadline to Friday to merge the current
work in-progress PRs.
Please ensure that all major features have been merged and that any minor
features have PRs by EOD Friday.
We will be cutting the 2.4 release branch early on Monday morning.
Thanks,
Mani
Hi All,
Please vote here for the formal approval of this KIP.
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6295#discussion_r328867657
Thanks,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:50 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> Hey y'all, resurrecting an old KIP for the benefit of KIP-382, which
> depends on an additional parameter
an merge accordingly.
*Please help us test the release! *
Thanks!
Manikumar
eId=97551484
>
- KIP-221: Enhance DSL with Connecting Topic Creation and Repartition Hint
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-221%3A+Enhance+DSL+with+Connecting+Topic+Creation+and+Repartition+Hint
>
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:54 AM Manikumar wrote:
>
Thanks Bruno. We will mark KIP-471 as complete.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:39 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> It is technically true that KIP-471 is not completed, but the only
> aspect that is not there are merely two metrics that I could not add
> due to the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8972
Thank you!
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:27 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Thanks Bruno. We will mark KIP-471 as complete.
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:39 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
>
>> Hi Manikumar,
>>
>> It is technically true that KIP-471 is no
lso https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9058 that I
> just merged.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 10/17/19 7:59 AM, Manikumar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The code freeze deadline has now passed and at this point only blockers
> > will be allowed.
> > We have th
Hi All,
We still have couple of blockers to close. PRs available for both the
blockers.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8972
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9080
Thanks,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:48 PM Manikumar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick update on the 2.
, 2019 at 9:20 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We still have couple of blockers to close. PRs available for both the
> blockers.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8972
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9080
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Ping. Any further votes or opinions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 A
Congrats Mickeal!
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:05 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> Congratulations Mickael!
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
> >
> > The PMC of Apache Kafka is pleased to announce a new Kafka committer
> > Mickael
> > Maison.
> >
> > Mickael has been contrib
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:11 PM Alexandre Dupriez <
alexandre.dupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Le ven. 8 nov. 2019 à 20:21, Bill Bejeck a écrit :
>
> > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:28 PM Gwen Sh
://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7678
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:03 PM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The underlying issue of KAFKA-8677 can cause data loss in consumers. I
> have included KAFKA-8677 as blocker to 2.4 release.
> Thanks to Guozhang for identifying the i
wrote:
> Hi again Manikumar,
>
> Thanks for looking at the PR. It's not easy to pin this particular bug
> down to a specific commit, but I've ported my test to the 2.3 branch.
>
> It looks like this bug pre-dates 2.4, so it's not a regression.
> Therefore, afte
Hi Randall and Konstantine,
Thanks for the explanation. Since it block users upgrading from older
Connect versions to
2.4 release, we will consider the JIRA as blocker for 2.4.0.
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:58 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi
for replica reassignment
- Sticky partitioner
- Return topic metadata and configs in CreateTopics response
- Securing Internal connect REST endpoints
- API to delete consumer offsets and expose it via the AdminClient.
Release notes for the 2.4.0 release:
https://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka
hanks,
Manikumar
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
Thans,
Manikumar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:46 AM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks for the work! I am also happy to see Trogdor being improved
>
> Best,
> Stanislav
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:34 AM Colin
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. I have given you wiki permissions.
Thanks,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:37 AM Charlie Getzen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to create a KIP around
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8930 as it changes the public
> interface.
>
> My username is wiki cgetzen and
n consumer property.
fewer options are better.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:53 PM Dániel Urbán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that this KIP turned somewhat inactive - I'd like to pick it up and
> work on it if it is okay.
> Part of the work is done, as switching to the Cons
uld I acquire a new id for the
> GetOffsetShell KIP, and update it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daniel
>
> Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún.
> 30., K, 9:23):
>
> > Hi Manikumar,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments.
> > 1. Will change this - thought that "
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. I have given you wiki edit permissions.
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:50 AM Jeremy Custenborder
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Could someone grant permissions to create a KIP to the user jcustenborder?
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. I have given you wiki edit permissions.
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:25 AM Mohamed Chebbi wrote:
> Hi
>
> could somone grant permission to create a KIP to user mhmdchebbi?
>
>
> Best Reguards
>
>
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP.
KIP looks good to me and will be a useful addition.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:05 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start discussion on a small KIP to make using the config
> provider mechanism more ergonomic o
Hi,
Thanks for your interest. I have given you wiki edit permissions.
Thanks,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:05 PM Arvin Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please help grant permission to create KIPs to user
> arvin.zheng?
>
> Thanks,
> Arvin
>
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:43 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Yes, it does.
>
> I guess many people are busy wrapping up 2.6 release. Today is code freeze.
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 6/10/20 12:11 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > hi Matthias,
> >
> > Does this straightfo
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/7/20 7:16 PM, John Roesler wrote:
> > Hi Badai,
> >
> > Thanks for picking this up. I've reviewed the KIP d
+1 (bindig)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM David Jacot wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-632, which is about making the config
> > provider mechanism more
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:19 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Thanks, Tom.
>
> I tried to think of a better way to do this, but I think you're right that
> we probably just need different methods.
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, at 01:14, Tom
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020.
> júl.
> 28., K, 16:06):
>
> > +1 from me (non-bindin
Hi John,
+1 (binding)
- Verified signatures, artifacts, Release notes
- Built from sources, ran tests
- Ran core/connect/streams quick start for Scala 2.13 release, ran few
manual tests
Thanks for driving the release.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:32 PM Ismael Juma wrote
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:43 AM Ron Dagostino wrote:
> Yes, Rajinit, it looks good -- an excellently-written KIP. Thanks!
>
> Ron
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:17 AM Andrew Otto wrote:
>
> > Yes please! I had to build custom tooling to automate generation and
> > distr
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:56 AM David Jacot wrote:
> Supporting PEM is really nice. Thanks, Rajini.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:18 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thank you for driving this, Rajini
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 202
Hi Raghu,
Thanks for the KIP. Proposed changes look good to me.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:44 PM Raghu B wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to start the discussion on the KIP-982 to Access
> SslPrincipalMapper and kerberosShortNamer in Custom KafkaPrin
ges to
docker hub. I am mainly asking because PMC needs to request docker hub
access/repos.
I can help in getting required repos/accounts.
https://infra.apache.org/docker-hub-policy.html
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 8:22 PM Krishna Agarwal <
krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wro
Hi,
> For the native AK docker image, we are considering '*kafka-local*' as it
clearly signifies that this image is intended exclusively for local
I am not sure, if there is any naming pattern for graalvm based images. Can
we include "graalvm" to the image name like "kafka-graalvm-native".
This w
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 4:26 AM Raghu B wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to start a vote on KIP-982, which proposed enhancements to
> the Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to allow access to SslPrincipalMapper and
> Ker
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jakub Scholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for the KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of
> certificates with different DN / SANs
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?page
Congrats!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 8:35 PM Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> Satish Duggana has been a Kafka committer since 2022. He has been very
> instrumental to the community since becoming a committer. It's my pleasure
> to announce that Satish is now a member of Kafka PMC.
>
> Congratulat
Thanks for the explanation. I am fine with using ""kafka-local" as the
image name.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:47 AM Krishna Agarwal <
krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> This image signifies 2 things:
>
>
Hi,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:41 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Krishna - looking forward to this. +1 (binding).
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:36 PM Krishna Agarwal <
> krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to call a vo
Hi Krishna,
Thanks for KIP. +1 (binding).
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 11:57 AM Krishna Agarwal <
krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to call a vote on KIP-974 which aims to publish a docker image for
> GraalVM based Native Kafka Broker.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the KIP. Great write-up!
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:17 PM Satish Duggana wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Thanks for the nice KIP, it will allow other messaging use cases to be
> onboarded to Kafka.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Satish.
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 03:41,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding).
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:50 PM Omnia Ibrahim wrote:
>
> Hi Ivan,
> Thanks for the KIP this is a very nice feature to have.
> +1(non-binding)
> Omnia
> > On 15 Apr 2024, at 14:33, Andrew Schofield
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP.
Manikumar
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:55 PM Justine Olshan
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Justine
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:36 AM Federico Valeri wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, May 14, 2024, 9:46 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
> +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024, 12:13 Vedarth Sharma
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-1028 which aims to introduce a JVM based
> > Docker Offi
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka. Updated the permissions.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 1:15 PM Kaushik Raina
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Please provide permissions to create KIP. I indent to contribute to Apache
> kafka
>
> Wiki Id: kra...@confluent.io
> Jira ID: k-raina
; Bruno Cadonna, Calvin Liu, Cameron Redpath, Cheng-Kai Zhang, Chia-Ping
> > Tsai, Chris Egerton, Colin Patrick McCabe, David Arthur, David Jacot, Divij
> > Vaidya, Dmitry Werner, Edoardo Comar, flashmouse, Florin Akermann,
> > Gantigmaa Selenge, Gaurav Narula, Greg Harris,
API. If so, Does this mean the group co-ordinator also
needs to write control records?
5. How about using "org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.share" package for
new interfaces/classes?
Thanks,
Manikumar
LGTM, Thanks for the KIP.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:50 PM Doğuşcan Namal
wrote:
> LGTM thanks for the KIP.
>
> +1(non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 15:22, Andrew Schofield <
> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Apoorv,
> > Thanks for the KIP. Looks like a useful change to t
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the KIP.
Manikumar
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 2:31 PM Andrew Schofield <
andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi Apoorv,
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> > On 19 Feb 2024, at 22:31, Apoorv Mitta
Crispin Bernier, David Arthur, David
> > > Jacot, David Mao, Deqi Hu, Dimitar Dimitrov, Divij Vaidya, Dongnuo
> > > Lyu, Eaugene Thomas, Eduwer Camacaro, Eike Thaden, Federico Valeri,
> > > Florin Akermann, Gantigmaa Selenge, Gaurav Narula, gongzhongqiang,
> > >
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the updated KIP. Few queries below:
1. What is the use-case of deliveryCount in ShareFetchResponse?
2. During delete share groups, Do we need to clean any in-memory state from
share-partition leaders?
3. Any metrics for the share-coordinator?
Thanks
Manikumar
On Wed, Feb
Hi,
I'd like to volunteer to be the release manager for a bug fix release of
the 3.6 line.
If there are no objections, I'll send out the release plan soon.
Thanks,
Manikumar
,
Manikumar
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 6:24 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1, Thanks Mani for volunteering.
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 06:01, Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> > +1, Thanks Manikumar!
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:40 AM Bruno Cadonna
> wrote:
> &
.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:09 PM Divij Vaidya
wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
>
> 1. Can you please take a look at
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15490
> which is a bug fix specific to the 3.6.x branch?
> 2. Should we do a one-time update of all dependencies in 3.6
Hi Edoardo,
Sure, we can include KAFKA-16369
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16369> based PR reviews.
Thanks,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:16 PM Edoardo Comar wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
> can we please include
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16369
> in 3.
al
> release on this branch.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 1:39 AM Divij Vaidya
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Manikumar,
> >
> > 1. Can you please take a look at
> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15490
> > which is a bug fix specific to the 3.6.x bra
Hi Edoardo,
sure, pls go ahead and cherry-pick the changes to 3.7 and 3.6 branches.
Thanks,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:53 PM Edoardo Comar wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16369
> is merged in trunk now.
> can you please cherry-pick it to 3
201 - 300 of 1736 matches
Mail list logo
