+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP.
Thanks, Manikumar On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Matthias > > On 7/7/20 7:16 PM, John Roesler wrote: > > Hi Badai, > > > > Thanks for picking this up. I've reviewed the KIP document and > > the threads you linked. I think we may want to make more > > improvements in the future to the printing of headers in particular, > > but this KIP seems like a clear benefit already. I think we can > > take it incrementally. > > > > I'm +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > -John > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 09:57, Badai Aqrandista wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> After resurrecting the discussion thread [1] for KIP-431 and have not > >> received any further feedback for 2 weeks, I would like to resurrect > >> the voting thread [2] for KIP-431. > >> > >> I have updated KIP-431 wiki page > >> ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-431%3A+Support+of+printing+additional+ConsumerRecord+fields+in+DefaultMessageFormatter > ) > >> to address Ismael's comment on that thread [3]. > >> > >> Does anyone else have other comments or objections about this KIP? > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raabf3268ed05931b8a048fce0d6cdf6a326aee4b0d89713d6e6998d6%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > >> > >> [2] > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/41fff34873184625370f9e76b8d9257f7a9e7892ab616afe64b4f67c%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > >> > >> [3] > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99e9cbaad4a0a49b96db104de450c9f488d4b2b03a09b991bcbadbc7%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Badai > >> > >
