Hi,

Yes, we can assign new id to this KIP.

Thanks.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:59 PM Dániel Urbán <urb.dani...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> To help with the discussion, I also have a PR for this KIP now. reflecting
> the current state of the KIP: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8957.
> I would like to ask a committer to start the test job on it.
>
> One thing I realised though is that there is a KIP id collision, there is
> another KIP with the same id:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=85474993
> What is the protocol in this case? Should I acquire a new id for the
> GetOffsetShell KIP, and update it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daniel
>
> Dániel Urbán <dur...@cloudera.com.invalid> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún.
> 30., K, 9:23):
>
> > Hi Manikumar,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments.
> > 1. Will change this - thought that "command-config" is used for admin
> > clients.
> > 2. It's not necessary, just felt like a nice quality-of-life feature -
> will
> > remove it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:16 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > Thanks for working on this KIP.  Proposed changes looks good to me,
> > >
> > > minor comments:
> > > 1. We use "command-config" option name in most of the cmdline tools to
> > pass
> > > config
> > > properties file. We can use the same name here.
> > >
> > > 2. Not sure, if we need a separate option to pass an consumer property.
> > > fewer options are better.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Manikumar
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:53 PM Dániel Urbán <urb.dani...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I see that this KIP turned somewhat inactive - I'd like to pick it up
> > and
> > > > work on it if it is okay.
> > > > Part of the work is done, as switching to the Consumer API is already
> > in
> > > > trunk, but some functionality is still missing.
> > > >
> > > > I've seen the current PR and the discussion so far, only have a few
> > > things
> > > > to add:
> > > > - I like the idea of the topic-partition argument, it would be useful
> > to
> > > > filter down to specific partitions.
> > > > - Instead of a topic list arg, a pattern would be more powerful, and
> > also
> > > > fit better with the other tools (e.g. how the kafka-topics tool
> works).
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to