Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-25 Thread Ewen Cheslack-Postava
t they can drag on sometimes. > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:31:37 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API > > From: wangg...@gmail.com > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > +1. > > > &

RE: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-23 Thread Andrew Schofield
+1 (non-binding) +1 for re-evaluating the KIP process. This one went through very quickly, but they can drag on sometimes. > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:31:37 -0700 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API > From: wangg...@gmail

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-23 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ashish Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process. > > > > I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even > > in-person at Kafka Sum

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-23 Thread Ashish Singh
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process. > > I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even > in-person at Kafka Summit?) to discuss. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Grant Henke wrote:

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-23 Thread Gwen Shapira
Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process. I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even in-person at Kafka Summit?) to discuss. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Grant Henke wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I am also a +1 to evaluating the KIP process and ways to mak

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-23 Thread Ismael Juma
+1 (non-binding) Ismael On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible, > and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to just > kick off voting on this KIP immediately (and restart

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-22 Thread Grant Henke
+1 (non-binding) I am also a +1 to evaluating the KIP process and ways to make it more effective and streamlined. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Liquan Pei wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen S

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-22 Thread Neha Narkhede
+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Liquan Pei wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything. > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava < > e...@confluent.io> > > wro

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-22 Thread Liquan Pei
+1 On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 > > Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava > wrote: > > > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible, > > and VOTE threads ta

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-22 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible, > and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to just > kick off voting

Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API

2016-03-22 Thread Jason Gustafson
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote: > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible, > and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to just > kick off voting on this KIP immediately (and restart it if som