Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process. I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even in-person at Kafka Summit?) to discuss.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I am also a +1 to evaluating the KIP process and ways to make it more > effective and streamlined. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Liquan Pei <liquan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava < > > > e...@confluent.io> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if > > > possible, > > > > > and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense > to > > > > just > > > > > kick off voting on this KIP immediately (and restart it if someone > > > raises > > > > > an issue). Feel free to object and comment in the DISCUSS thread if > > you > > > > > feel there's something to still be discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-51+-+List+Connectors+REST+API > > > > > > > > > > I'll obviously kick things off with a +1. > > > > > > > > > > -Ewen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Liquan Pei > > > Department of Physics > > > University of Massachusetts Amherst > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Neha > > > > > > -- > Grant Henke > Software Engineer | Cloudera > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke >
